|

Florida
Supreme Court: Insurers
Not Responsible for Flood Damage
By Michael Peltier
Naples Daily News
September 20, 2007
TALLAHASSEE — In a case
that may reduce payouts to hundreds of 2004 hurricane victims, the
Florida Supreme Court ruled Thursday that insurers must only pay for
damage specifically covered by their policies.
The 7-0 decision affects
many homeowners who have not settled with their insurance companies
over whether damage caused by Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan, or
Jeanne came from wind or flood waters, for which many homeowners are
not insured.
The opinion will not affect
residents who have already settled with their insurance companies,
attorneys familiar with the case said Thursday.
Officials say most of the
customers affected by the ruling are Panhandle residents who were
insured by Citizens Property Insurance Corp., the state-run insurer
of last resort. Citizens has 200 cases pending involving up to 1,000
individual policyholders.
But some Southwest Florida
residents whose homes were destroyed by flood waters and not wind
will also likely see smaller payouts.
"This is primarily going to
affect victims of Hurricane Ivan," said Sam Miller, executive vice
president of the Florida Insurance Council, an industry group. "But
anyone whose home was destroyed by flood (in 2004) will also be
affected."
Following the 2004
hurricane season, nearly 49,000 homes — including 10,250 in Collier,
Lee and Charlotte counties — were destroyed. Many homeowners
challenged when insurance companies refused to pay for flood damage.
They brought their cases to court.
In 2005, lawmakers changed
the statute at the behest of the insurance industry to state that
insurers are only responsible for damages from sources outlined in
their policies.
Thursday’s action dealt
specifically with an Escambia County man whose home was destroyed
when Ivan struck the Panhandle in September 2004. Eugene Cox sought
$117,000 in damages to his home
Florida Farm Bureau
Insurance, said Cox was entitled to $16,800, saying the rest of the
damage came from flooding water, which was not covered under his
policy.
Last year, the 1st District
Court of Appeal ruled that Farm Bureau was liable for all damages.
In response, Citizens set aside $150 million to pay potential
claims.
On Thursday, the state high
court resoundingly disagreed.
"We do not find that the
plain language of the statute intends that if a covered peril causes
part of a total loss, that the insurer is mandated to pay for the
total loss," Justice Charles Wells wrote for the majority. "We read
the plain language of the statute not to reasonably support such an
interpretation."
The opinion pleased
insurance industry representatives, who said the lower court ruling
came as a huge surprise.
"The (Supreme) Court ruling
confirms what we were saying in 2004," said Justin Glover, spokesman
for State Farm Insurance Cos. "The court got it exactly right."
While an obvious
disappointment to affected homeowners, Miller said the ruling was a
positive development for other policyholders.
"That’s money now that will
go to pay future hurricane claims," Miller said. "It will increase
their surplus and reduce the amount of state assessments that will
have to be imposed."
- - -
The 2004 Hurricane Season
resulted in the total loss of nearly 49,000 homes statewide,
including many in Lee and Collier counties. Most claims have been
paid but some are still in dispute and could be affected by
Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling:
TOTAL LOSS CLAIMS FOR 2004
Collier: 74
Charlotte: 8,507
Lee: 1,669
Statewide: 48,839
SOURCE: Office of Insurance
Regulation
[Index
to Articles]
|