|

Dr. Phil Show
September 15, 2004
Bridget Marks became
pregnant with twin daughters as a result of an affair with a
married man. When he found out she was pregnant, she says he
wanted her to get an abortion, and once the
children
were born, he refused to
sign an acknowledge-ment
of paternity, therefore relinquishing any legal
responsibility. She continued her relation-ship with the man
after the birth of the girls, knowing he was married.
Bridget says she tried many times to end their relationship,
but he always threatened her with taking away the girls.
"Over a period of time I discovered that he was reckless and
inappropriate with the children and every time I sought to
break the relationship off, he would threaten me with taking
the children away," she tells Dr. Phil. She finally broke up
with him, and he was allowed visitation with the girls.
After sexual abuse allegations by Bridget, the father filed
for custody of the girls, and the drawn-out custody battle
ensued. The court determined that Bridget lied about the
molestation, and therefore they gave custody of the children
to the father. On June 1, 2004, Bridget was devastated to
hand over her 4-year-old daughters to their father.
Bridget defends her molestation accusations. "I did not lie.
I was a fit mother. I am a fit mother whose children came
home with stories," Bridget tells Dr. Phil. "I took them to
professionals to investigate whether or not what they said
was
true. I was given an affidavit by an M.D., a child
psychiatrist from Columbia University saying that my
daughters had been inappropriately touched, or that she
thought that there was about a 60-70 percent chance that
they had been touched. She gave me an affidavit to go to the
court and to tell the court that the father should only have
the strictest access to the children under court
supervision."
Dr. Phil notes that a court appointed psychiatrist did an
evaluation and determined that she had coached the children.
"He did not examine the children after the second
allegation, so he basically, without even examining the
children or asking them any questions, determined that it
was false," Bridget explains to Dr. Phil.
Dr. Phil explains that when Bridget visits with her girls
now, it costs at least $700 a day, because the court says
that they have to be fully supervised visits. There have to
be monitors in the room so she doesn't coach her children to
say something.
Dr. Phil makes clear that the show tried to contact the
father of the girls, and there has been no response from
him.
Bridget says
that she will never stop fighting for her daughters.
"I will fight until my last breath," she tells Dr.
Phil.
Dr.
Phil introduces Dean Tong and Kathie Mathis, two
individuals who are helping Bridget fight her
custody battle. Dean is an author and a consultant
on contested custody abuse cases, and has been
working for 20 years on these types of cases. He
says that he has seen a lot of errors in this case.
"We believe that this is a case of bad science
producing bad law."
Dr.
Kathie Mathis is a psychologist who works with
mothers who are in a similar position to Bridget and
their children. She has helped Bridget write an
affidavit stating the impact of what's taken place.
Dr. Phil mentions that Bridget has written a
romantic thriller exploring love, loss, deception
and redemption called September. "I wrote
it as an outlet for all of my pain and stress and
frustration," she explains. "I will fight anywhere I
have to go to get my girls back." |
|
Playboy Mom's 9/11 Cash
Cow
By Richard Johnson
Sep 13, 2004
Bridget Marks, the former Playboy
model who lost custody of her twin daughters earlier this year in a
bitter court case, has written a post-9/11 potboiler called
"September" so she can pay her lawyers.
"I wrote the book for the girls,
during the trial, and it incorporates many of the things I went
through. These were my darkest moments," Marks told PAGE SIX. "My
poor children. I just feel so sorry for them."
The twins, Amber and Scarlett,
celebrated their fifth birthday on Wednesday with their mother, who
was allowed unsupervised visitation for the first time since their
father, gambling tycoon John Aylsworth, got custody in June.
The court found that Marks had
coached the twins to lie that Aylsworth had molested them and that
she was poisoning the youngsters' relationship with their father.
He's a better custodian for our
kids?" Marks fumed. "Judge Arlene D. Goldberg should be tarred and
feathered. She's not fit to sit in traffic court."
Marks will appear Wednesday on the
"Dr. Phil" TV show to talk about both the novel and her personal
ordeal.
"It's a romantic thriller about a
beautiful New York socialite who loses her son on 9/11," she said.
"She risks everything and travels the world to find out if the
greatest love of her life was one of the masterminds behind the
attack. It's a love story that spans 30 years and three continents."
Newscaster Linda Ellerbee liked the
book so much she gave it a blurb: " 'September' is more than a
novel. It's a first-rate lesson in the survival of love. No small
thing, that."
Marks is showing the same grit as
her protagonist in pursuing her case in the Appellate Division. She
also plans to sue several court-appointed "experts"
psychiatrists, social workers and guardians over their testimony.
"There is an epidemic in Family
Court of good mothers losing custody of their children," Marks told
us. "The court system is embarrassed.
"I'm thinking of running for the
City Council on the Upper East Side," she added. "If there's any way
I can help other women and children, I will do it."
Playboy Mom's 9/11 Cash
Cow
By Richard Johnson
Sep 13, 2004
Bridget Marks, the former Playboy
model who lost custody of her twin daughters earlier this year in a
bitter court case, has written a post-9/11 potboiler called
"September" so she can pay her lawyers.
"I wrote the book for the girls,
during the trial, and it incorporates many of the things I went
through. These were my darkest moments," Marks told PAGE SIX. "My
poor children. I just feel so sorry for them."
The twins, Amber and Scarlett,
celebrated their fifth birthday on Wednesday with their mother, who
was allowed unsupervised visitation for the first time since their
father, gambling tycoon John Aylsworth, got custody in June.
The court found that Marks had
coached the twins to lie that Aylsworth had molested them and that
she was poisoning the youngsters' relationship with their father.
He's a better custodian for our
kids?" Marks fumed. "Judge Arlene D. Goldberg should be tarred and
feathered. She's not fit to sit in traffic court."
Marks will appear Wednesday on the
"Dr. Phil" TV show to talk about both the novel and her personal
ordeal.
"It's a romantic thriller about a
beautiful New York socialite who loses her son on 9/11," she said.
"She risks everything and travels the world to find out if the
greatest love of her life was one of the masterminds behind the
attack. It's a love story that spans 30 years and three continents."
Newscaster Linda Ellerbee liked the
book so much she gave it a blurb: " 'September' is more than a
novel. It's a first-rate lesson in the survival of love. No small
thing, that."
Marks is showing the same grit as
her protagonist in pursuing her case in the Appellate Division. She
also plans to sue several court-appointed "experts"
psychiatrists, social workers and guardians over their testimony.
"There is an epidemic in Family
Court of good mothers losing custody of their children," Marks told
us. "The court system is embarrassed.
"I'm thinking of running for the
City Council on the Upper East Side," she added. "If there's any way
I can help other women and children, I will do it."
Without Minders
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
August 27th, 2004
The wealthy father of love twins Amber and Scarlet Aylsworth waved a
flag of truce yesterday, agreeing to drop demands that his
ex-mistress be supervised while visiting their daughters.
Manhattan Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg agreed.
That clears the way for Bridget Marks to spend time alone with
the 4-year-old girls for the first time in months.
Marks raised the twins from birth but lost custody when Goldberg
ruled the former Playboy model had falsely accused the father, John
Aylsworth, 54, of sexually abusing the girls.
"Today was a victory," said Marks, 38, who has lost round after
round in the bitter custody fight. She paid $17,000 this summer to
social workers to monitor some 500 hours of visits and numerous
phone calls to the kids.
"I won't give up until I have my girls back," she added.
A psychiatrist seeing the twins has advised that "supervision is
harmful for the children and disruptive," according to their
court-appointed lawyer.
On June 1, Marks handed over the identical twins to Aylsworth,
head of President Casinos Inc., in a heart-wrenching spectacle recorded by news cameras.
Goldberg ruled that Marks' "unbridled anger" toward the married
tycoon was alienating the children from their dad. The judge made
Aylsworth and his wife move to New York.
Since then, Marks, who has tried acting and writing romance
novels, has appeared on CNN's "Larry King Live" and ABC's "Primetime
Live" to air unrelenting criticism of New York's child custody
system.
Now, TV's Dr. Phil McGraw is on the case. Marks taped a segment
with the CBS pop psychologist that is tentatively set to air Sept.
15. In court, various parties said McGraw has been telephoning them.
"There's definitely going to be some followup," a show spokesman
said yesterday. "One of the things that Dr. Phil prides himself on
is extensive aftercare for folks who are on the show."
|
Twins' Mom Loses Again
|
By Bob Port
Daily News
July 28, 2004
|
 |
| Bridget Marks |
|
|
Bridget
Marks, the mom who lost her 4-year-old twins to their casino
executive father, begged a judge yesterday to stop making her
pay thousands of dollars to visit her daughters.
But Manhattan Family
Court Judge Arlene Goldberg said no.
"It's not time yet,"
the judge said, ruling that paid social workers, at $25 an hour
around the clock, must continue.
"We are looking out for
the best interests of the children," Goldberg said.
The social workers are
there to assure Marks never bad-mouths John Aylsworth, president
and chief operating officer of President Casinos Inc., based in
St. Louis.
Aylsworth fathered the
identical twin girls, Amber and Scarlet, while he was having an
affair with Marks.
Goldberg awarded
Aylsworth custody in May, ruling that because Marks was
alienating the twins against their father, they would be better
off living with him.
Since then, Marks has
spent $9,000 for phone calls and three visits totaling 12 days
with her daughters, whom she reared alone from birth at her
upper East Side apartment.
"She doesn't have the
resources to pay for ongoing supervision," Michael Joseph, her
attorney, protested. The children are in therapy and "we believe
it is not necessary," he said.
Aylsworth, who appeared
in court with his wife yesterday, objected. His attorney,
Patricia Grant, said that if money is a problem, Marks could
visit her girls free at one of the city welfare agencies set up
to supervise visitation.
Molly Murphy of Lawyers
for Children, the public-interest law firm appointed to
represent the 4-year-olds, also objected. "Now is not the time,"
Murphy said. "It's very early."
Lawyers for Children
has argued that supervision is in the best interests of Amber
and Scarlet.
Marks "has been very
cooperative," said Richard Spitzer, the director of
Comprehensive Family Services, the firm supplying live-in social
workers to accompany the twins. "There is room for improvement,"
he added.
Spitzer disclosed that
the twins have a problem with "hysterical screaming" during
"transitions" - when the time comes to return to their father.
In fact, the twins are
repeatedly refusing to leave their mom. Scarlet, for example,
once forced Spitzer physically to carry her, crying and
screaming down Third Ave., away from the building that was once
home.
The twins also have
refused to answer questions from a new psychiatrist appointed by
the court to help them.
"I am saying exactly
what the psychiatrist told me to say," Marks said yesterday. "I
say I love you and I'll miss you and tell them when I'll see
them again."
"The kids," she said
outside court, "just plain don't want to go back there."
|
|
Their
Sunday Best
Mom & Twins Reunite for Mass, Joined by a Big-bucks Chaperon
By Nicole Bode
New York Daily News
July 19, 2004
|
 |
| Bridget Marks is flanked by her
twin 4-year-old daughters, Scarlet (l.) and Amber, after
they all attended Sunday Mass. |
|
|
Any Sunday she can
take her twin daughters to Mass is precious to Bridget
Marks.
The embattled
Manhattan mom who has been fighting for custody of
4-year-old Scarlet and Amber got a now-rare opportunity to
foster her daughters' faith yesterday morning at St. John
the Martyr on the upper East Side.
Marks paid little
mind to the press throng, there to cover the ouster of her
longtime priest - and personal favorite - Msgr. John
Woolsey. Instead, she focused on the joy of having her
preschoolers snuggled close on either side of her in the
pew, reading with her from the hymnbook and beaming as she
caressed their hair.
"I am very happy to
be with them, no matter what the circumstances," Marks, 38,
later told the Daily News, her voice choked with emotion.
"[But] It's very, very important for any people in crisis to
have their faith."
Marks said she's
terrified the girls have been blocked from their faith since
she lost custody of them to their casino tycoon dad, John
Aylsworth, on June 1.
The one-time
Playboy model also lives under constant fear the courts
could strip away her tenuous visitation rights - which could
be cut off if she lets slip a single nasty word about
Aylsworth, or discloses the girls' whereabouts to the media.
So it was with
trepidation that Marks told The News she still has no idea
how often her daughters will be able to accompany her to
Mass in the future.
She said she could
not disclose what the rest of the girls' summer will hold -
whether they will go to California with their father or stay
with her.
But after spending
the hour-long Mass doting on her daughters, who clambered
onto her lap and showered her with hugs and kisses as a
court-mandated $1,000-per-day social worker looked on, Marks
said she could not bear the thought of being without them.
"They don't even like me to leave the apartment," Marks
wept. "It's just a sad thing."
Marks had reared
the twins - the result of an affair with the married
Aylsworth - since birth. But the 54-year-old millionaire was
awarded custody after a judge found Marks had bad-mouthed
him to the girls.
For now, Marks is
hoping the judge will allow her more time with her
daughters, so that she can bring them to church for First
Communion classes. Marks and the girls lit a trio of red
prayer candles at Mass' end. "Just to bring us back together
permanently, it's their greatest wish," Marks said.
(Msgr. John Woolsey, is under
investigation for $1million in missing church funds, of St.
John the Martyr. Woolsey, stepped down last week after an
audit by the Archdiocese of New York found about $1 million
in church funds went missing during his eight years at St.
John's. Rev. Joseph Baker was conducting the services.)
|
Twins' Trip Hinges On Shrink
Rap
By Barbara Ross and Owne Moritz
New York Daily News
July 10, 2004
A court-appointed
psychiatrist had her first meeting yesterday with the twin
daughters of Bridget Marks while a judge decides whether to
permit the 4-year-olds to vacation with their father in
California.
Marks said after a
court hearing in Manhattan that the unidentified psychiatrist
told the court "it is not a good idea" for the twins to leave
New York.
Lawyers for Marks, 38,
a former Playboy model and the twins' father, casino millionaire
John Aylsworth, 54, clashed in court over several issues.
Family Court Judge
Arlene Goldberg awarded custody of the girls, Amber and Scarlet,
to Aylsworth on June 1. Goldberg and several court-appointed
experts said Marks had alienated the girls against Aylsworth and
falsely accused him of sexually molesting them.
Marks is appealing.
Aylsworth, who is under
court order to move to New York, has agreed to enroll the girls
in a Manhattan preschool in September. But he has asked the
court for vacation time in California, where he and his wife
live.
Marks lawyer Michael
Joseph challenged Goldberg's order that the mother's contacts
with the children be supervised by social workers at a cost of
up to $5,000 a week.
But Goldberg rejected
the suggestion that the father should pay for the supervision.
"How is it his responsibility to pay when it's her wrongdoing
that requires it," Goldberg snapped.
Aylsworth attorney
Patricia Grant said Marks had assets of $266,790 and has a
fiance picking up her rent and legal fees.
|
OK Twins' California Summer
By
William Sherman
New York Daily News
July 7, 2004
|
It's going to be a long, lonely summer for Bridget Marks, whose
twin daughters will go back to California with their father next
week, under a Family Court judge's ruling yesterday.
Marks' attorneys argued
the 4-year-old girls should remain in Manhattan, to permit
frequent visits with their mother, who raised them from birth.
But Judge Arlene
Goldberg said the girls could go back to the West Coast with
their father, wealthy casino tycoon John Aylsworth.
Goldberg gave a little
something to both sides in the custody battle, however,
stipulating the twins could not stay away from Manhattan and
their mother as "long as Mr. Aylsworth wants."
And Goldberg hinted
that the restrictions on Marks' visits with her kids - now
supervised 24 hours a day by social workers - could end during
the next six months.
Marks has to pay the
social workers $5,000 a week.
The continuing custody
battle pits Marks, 38, a former Playboy magazine model, against
Aylsworth, 54, a married grandfather with whom she had an
affair.
Goldberg awarded
custody of the girls, Amber and Scarlet, to Aylsworth on June 1.
Goldberg and several court-appointed experts said Marks had
alienated the girls against Aylsworth and falsely accused him of
sexually molesting them.
Marks plans to appeal
Goldberg's custody decision in the Appellate Division of
Manhattan Supreme Court.
She lost a round in
that battle yesterday. Appellate Justice John Burke denied her
request for an emergency stay of Goldberg's custody ruling
pending the appeal.
|
Interview
With Bridget Marks on Larry King
Aired
on CNN
July 5, 2004 - 21:00 ET
To read transcript of interview
click here.
See Twins
- for 5g!
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
July 1, 2004
It looks like Manhattan mom
Bridget Marks finally will get to see her little girls - but it's
gonna cost her, big-time.
The feisty mom, who lost
custody of her 4-year-old twins to casino tycoon John Aylsworth, can
have home visits, a judge said yesterday, but only if she shells out
$5,000 a week for court-appointed social workers to watch her every
move.
Based on the number of
planned visits, that could mean as much as $50,000 a year.
Manhattan Family Court
Judge Arlene Goldberg also told Marks that if she says anything bad
about her daughters' father - an ex-lover she despises - the social
worker has the authority to terminate the visit on the spot.
"It's obviously punitive,"
said Marks, whose custody battle will be the subject of a report on
ABC's "PrimeTime Thursday" program tonight.
Goldberg approved the
visitation rules, ending weeks of uncertainty for Marks, who lost
her children on June 1 after the judge granted custody to Aylsworth.
Yesterday, Goldberg also
ordered Marks not to allow the news media access to her twins for
the next year or reveal their "precise whereabouts."
The judge said the children
will be harmed by reporters interviewing them or photographers
taking their picture. "I can't have that," she declared.
"My job is to protect these
children," Goldberg said. "That's what I intend to do."
Goldberg awarded Aylsworth
custody, ruling that the trauma of taking the girls from their
life-long home with Marks was better than letting Marks further
alienate the girls from their father.
Marks, a former Playboy
model, went public, lambasting the court, its overpriced forensic
psychiatrist and what she views as gross injustice in the state's
custody system.
Yesterday, she was stunned
again at the price tag of visitation. She said Comprehensive Family
Services, the firm appointed to supervise her, has warned her to
expect costs of $4,500 to $5,000 per week.
"It's like a poll tax and
it basically is like terminating my parental rights," Marks said.
"As long as I've agreed not to let the children be interviewed, I
don't see why I need supervised visitation."
The social workers must
accompany her and the girls everywhere - even the bathroom - and are
preparing a script for things she should say, Marks said. "It's just
bizarre," she said, "and completely insane."
Judge
Balks Bridget's Twin Hopes
When Will She See Her Girls?
New York Daily News
June 28, 2004
Bridget Marks has no idea
when she will see her 4-year-old
twin daughters
again.
A month after transferring
custody of little Amber and Scarlet to their millionaire dad and his
wife, Manhattan Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg stunned Marks
this week by indicating she might let the twins stay at their dad's
Malibu, Calif., estate all summer.
Then again, she might not.
The judge might allow the
children to stay overnight at their mother's home for a visit.
Bridget Marks
hugs
her twins, 4-year-old
Then again, she
might not.
twins Amber (r.)
and
Scarlet, shortly
And, despite repeated pleas from Marks, Goldberg has yet
before they left her
to
to settle how many thousands of dollars the mom must pay
go live with their
court-appointed supervisors when she does visit her kids.
father.
The judge also is not
responding to new questions about whether the girls will be allowed
to attend Catholic church services or Sunday school.
"I miss them so much,"
Marks said Friday, as she began to cry. "I miss them more than I
ever imagined I could."
All month, Marks has been
required to pay court-appointed social workers to monitor daily
phone calls with her kids.
"They keep asking me,
'Mommy, when are we coming home?' - and I'm not allowed to say
anything," she said. "It's just not fair."
In May, Goldberg ordered
the twins given to their father, John Aylsworth, president of
President Casinos Inc., on the condition he move within 40 miles of
Marks' upper East Side home. But when he will make the move remains
unclear.
Marks, a former Playboy
model, began an affair with Aylsworth in 1998. She became pregnant,
resisted pressure from Aylsworth and his wife to have an abortion,
then reared the twins alone.
Goldberg ruled that because
Marks, 38, was denigrating Aylsworth, the children would be better
off living with their 54-year-old father.
Aylsworth, the judge's May
order declared, could take the girls anywhere on vacation for a
"consecutive four-week period" beginning June 1. "The children shall
then have supervised visitation time with the mother for a one-week
period," she ruled.
But for weeks, Goldberg,
who is the subject of an abuse-of-judicial-authority complaint by
Marks to the state Commission on Judicial Conduct, has failed to
give her lawyers guidelines for how the distraught mom can visit her
daughters.
"It's becoming surreal,"
said Tom Shanahan, Marks' attorney. "It's out of control."
Shanahan said he expects
Goldberg to issue a more detailed order today. Aylsworth's attorney
did not respond to a call seeking comment.
Although courtrooms in
Family Court are supposed to be open to the public, and despite
public interest in the case, Goldberg has begun holding hearings by
telephone with lawyers - making it impossible for the public to hear
what she says or observe what the elected judge does.
Before leaving their
mother, Amber and Scarlet Aylsworth had attended Mass at a Catholic
church most Sundays with Marks.
Aylsworth, Marks contends,
is refusing to allow them to continue going to church. Marks had
hoped to have her daughters attend Sunday school to prepare them for
their First Communion in two years.
"Now, John even wants to
take Jesus away from them," Marks said.
Courts
See Moms as Guilty till Proven Innocent
By Amy Neustein and Michael
Lesher
New York Daily News
June 20, 2004
Bridget Marks' tearful
farewell to her 4-year-old twins after a Manhattan Family Court
judge ordered them into the custody of a father they accused of
touching their private parts is a scene reenacted in custody trials
across the country, in which mothers bring good-faith allegations of
sexual abuse.
All too often, young
children are taken from the only home they have ever known, not
because their mother has been found unfit, but because she was
concerned about improper sexual contact between her children and
their father.
Judges in New York and
other states have adopted a bizarre rule that a mother alleging sex
abuse in a custody dispute is guilty until proved innocent: If her
abuse charge is not supported by overwhelming evidence, she will
lose custody for making an accusation that "poisons" the
relationship between father and child.
In fact, as we are seeing
in the Marks case, she can end up being doubly penalized: After she
loses custody, the accused abuser can actually hit her up for child
support.
Marks' suspicions were not
without support. A baby-sitter reported that the children told her
their father had "touched their peepee." A police investigator was
concerned enough about the charges to recommend that a prominent
forensic psychologist interview the children (an interview that was
never allowed to take place). Another psychologist recommended
strict supervision for the father's visits with the girls.
Judge Arlene Goldberg held
the mother to a Kafkaesque standard: While rejecting evidence that
explained the mother's suspicions, the judge required Marks to prove
she would foster a "loving" relationship between the man accused of
abuse and the children she was desperately trying to protect.
Adding insult to injury for
Marks, supervisors appointed by the court actually left the father
alone with the children on several critical occasions, court papers
show.
What happened to Marks has
happened to mothers across the country. We have studied two decades'
worth of custody litigation, and we have found that mothers who
raise allegations of sexual abuse against the children's fathers are
likely to be punished with the loss of custody even when there is no
proof that the abuse charges were fabricated or that they did
anything to harm their children's welfare.
Courts focus instead on the
supposed evil of making a charge that, by its very nature, is
extremely difficult to prove. Then, with the fathers presumed
innocent, the mothers bear the burden of proving that their
intentions were good.
If they fail, they end up
like Marks, who cannot even speak to her children without
professional supervision but who now may have to pay child support
to their rich father.
Neustein and Lesher are
authors of "From Madness to Mutiny: Why Are Mothers Running from the
Family Court?" due out in spring 2005.
Give Press Boot - Twins' Daddy
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
June 18, 2004
|
|
Lawyers for John Aylsworth and his twin love children asked a
judge to throw the press out of court yesterday, saying the
media attention to his custody battle was frightening the
4-year-olds.
Then, Aylsworth,
connected by phone to a court loudspeaker, began to cry.
He recalled the scene
June 1 when news cameras surrounded the girls on a Manhattan
streetcorner as he took them from their sobbing mother, his
ex-mistress.
"The girls bring up all
the time that they were scared," the riverboat casino exec said,
his voice cracking. "They were nervous. Why were all these
people in their face?"
"It's just very sad to
see all the pain they have from that experience," he said,
crying.
Both Aylsworth's
attorney and Lawyers for Children Inc., a taxpayer-financed
agency appointed to represent the twins, urged Manhattan Family
Court Judge Arlene Goldberg to eject reporters from the
courtroom.
It would be "in the
best interests of the children," they said.
Goldberg declined, but
invited the lawyers to file written requests to be argued later
with news media attorneys.
Yesterday's hearing
then degenerated into an argument over supervised visitation for
the twins' mom, Bridget Marks, 38, the upper East Side socialite
who gave birth to the girls during an affair with the married
Aylsworth.
In May, Goldberg
awarded custody of the girls to Aylsworth, 54, and his wife on
the grounds that Marks had harmed the children's relationship
with their father and made false accusations that he sexually
abused them.
The identical twins,
Amber and Scarlet, are with their father in California on a
four-week vacation. They return for a one-week visit with mom in
early July.
Both Aylsworth's lawyer
and Lawyers for Children said Marks should have 24-hour
supervision if the judge allows the girls to sleep at their
mom's home, where Marks reared them alone from birth.
|
Twins'
Daddy Twists Knife
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
June 17, 2004
He got her kids, and now he
wants her money, too.
The big-bucks corporate
exec who stunned New Yorkers by taking 4-year-old twins away from
his ex-mistress sued her yesterday for child support.
John Aylsworth makes
$521,000 a year as president of riverboat casinos in Missouri and
Mississippi.
Bridget Marks, 38, the
former Playboy model who lost legal custody of her daughters to
Aylsworth last month and does not have a job, was nearly speechless.
"I just don't understand," she said. "It's just too ridiculous."
"It's like pulling the
wings off a fly," said Raoul Felder, the city's dean of divorce law,
who is not involved in the case. "This shows a kind of arrogance, to
even attempt something like that."
Aylsworth's attorney was
unavailable for comment. A hearing in the bizarre custody drama is
scheduled in Manhattan Family Court today.
Aylsworth, 54, a married
man for 34 years, began an affair with Marks in 1998 that ended
bitterly in 2002. He had paid Marks $6,000 a month after Amber and
Scarlet were born in September 1999. He stopped the payments in late
2002, but in early 2003 a court ordered him to fork over $4,200 a
month.
On May 21, Manhattan Judge
Arlene Goldberg awarded custody to Aylsworth and his wife on the
grounds that Marks alienated the girls against their father and made
false accusations that he sexually abused them.
Under New York law,
Aylsworth may win child support from Marks, but probably not much.
Using a legal formula, a judge would start with $80,000 or more as
an annual child-rearing cost, then divide that amount in proportion
to each parent's income. Marks then would owe a fraction of that
amount.
With no job and legal bills
of nearly $800,000, Marks relies on her mother, fiancιι and others
for help. She got a $25,000 book advance this year for a romance
novel but owes an editor one-third of that and an agent 10% to 15%.
Still, the law would let a
judge "impute" an income figure for Marks based on odd sources of
cash. The judge could also calculate extra costs for the custodial
parent, such as private school and medical care - and even
baby-sitters to help Aylsworth's wife, who cares for her cheating
husband's love twins.
Hal Mayerson, co-chairman
of the state Bar Association's custody law committee, called the
child-support suit "nothing more than harassment."
"This is the dumbest thing
this guy could do, because he's now opened his finances to Bridget
Marks," Mayerson said. "I don't understand why this was done other
than to to just drive her crazy."
Fed Judge Turns
Twins' Ma Away
By Bob Port and William
Sherman
New York Daily News
June 8, 2004 |
| Bridget
Marks lost another round yesterday in her custody fight for her
twin daughters and now probably will not get to see them until
the end of the month.
A federal judge
rejected her request for the girls to be temporarily returned to
her, pending her appeal of a Family Court decision giving their
father full custody.
So the 4-year-old
twins, Amber and Scarlet, will stay with their father, John
Aylsworth, who lives in an estate in Malibu, Calif. Marks lives
on the upper East Side.
"This court is not a
Family Court," said Manhattan Federal Court Judge George
Daniels, after hearing extensive arguments from both sides.
Marks was grim but
composed, as Daniels told her to fight it out in the appellate
division of state court. "That is the appropriate place," he
said.
But he added that Marks
is entitled to more explanation of the Family Court ruling and
he invited her to come back to federal court if "there is an
unreasonable delay" in getting that information. Marks had no
comment when she left the courtroom to face a phalanx of
reporters.
Her attorney, Thomas
Shanahan, said, "This is not going away, not by a long shot."
Appeals will continue, Shanahan promised, with the next stop, at
the state's appeals court.
Aylsworth, a
54-year-old casino president, fathered the twins during an
extramarital affair with Marks, 38, a former Playboy model and
actress.
(To read the complaint in the federal case go to
http://www.shanahanlaw.com/marks/Marks.VerifiedComplaint.pdf
Diane Sawyer interview
with Bridget Marks and attorney Thomas Shanahan
http://www.shanahanlaw.com/marks/shanahan.mov )
Court
Blow to 'Molest' Accuser
By Heidi Singer
New York Post
June 8, 2004
A federal judge yesterday refused to step into the bitter
custody battle between a former Playboy model and the casino
mogul ex-lover she wrongly tried to paint as a child molester.
Lawyers for Bridget
Marks, the mother of the 4-year-old twin girls, argued she lost
custody of the girls for no good reason last month because the
judge relied on court-appointed experts and the current
system of court-appointed experts is corrupt, with assignments
handed out to the politically connected, not the most qualified.
But federal Judge
George Daniels refused to accept the case, saying the appeals
court now handling it is capable of addressing her concerns, as
long as the process is handled in a timely manner.
Last week, the children
were taken from their mother by court order. Judge Arlene
Goldberg gave custody to casino mogul John Aylsworth, 54, and
longtime wife Karen, because she found Marks was poisoning the
girls' relationship with their father by coaching them to say he
had molested them.
Marks can't appeal the
Family Court decision until July 5.
A disappointed Marks
left federal court yesterday stone-faced and silent.
|
Mom's
Pain
Spelled Out
New York Daily News
June 6, 2004
 |
| An aching heart and a photo of her
twins are constant companions of Bridget Marks.
|
|
|
Bridget Marks last saw her daughters five days ago, when their
wealthy father, Marks' ex-lover, took custody under a Manhattan
Family Court parental alienation order.
She's talked with them
on the phone, but only by paying a $75-per-hour court-appointed
social worker to monitor her every word. If Marks cries or says
anything to trigger her children's emotions over losing her, the
call will be cut off, by order of Manhattan Judge Arlene
Goldberg.
The Daily News invited
Marks, 38, to write an open letter to her 4-year-old twin girls,
Amber and Scarlet - and she did. "Thank you, thank you so much,"
she said, as she began to cry. "Thank God for the First
Amendment."
"Remember," she writes
to her daughters, "don't go to the swimming pool alone," which
suggests they may be at the Malibu, Calif., estate of their
father, casino executive John Aylsworth, 54, and his wife of 34
years, Karen, 53. Marks won't say, in fact, where they are.
"They're frightened and
they miss me," Marks lamented Friday, after her second phone
call to Amber and Scarlet. "I can hear it in their voices."
The letter
Dear
Amberinna and Scarlettina,
Mommy loves you so much and misses you. You are my heartbeats
you know. I am like half a pair of scissors since they cut me
out of your lives.
You are my warrior princesses and you must be strong and know
that God is watching over you while we are apart. Remember to
say your prayers and don't be afraid because when I can't be
with you, God is there to protect you.
Mommy is making sure Kiki and Gem are getting fed the little
treats you always gave them. Fay Fay is keeping Mommy company
and allyour friends, especially Sophia, say "hi" and hope you'll
be back soon.
Grandma says you'll be back in time to pick the tomatoes you
planted last weekend in her garden.
Remember, don't go to the swimming pool alone and always wear
water wings and eat your vegetables.
Hoping to hold you both
in my arms again soonest!
Love, kisses and hugs,
Meema
|
Love-Twin Dad Tied to Iffy
Land Deal
|
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
June 6, 2004
|
| |
 |
| John Aylsworth
|
|
|
John Aylsworth,
the fat-cat father who took his love twins from
their mother this week, was the architect of an
inflated land deal that funneled $40.5 million to
the chairman of his casino business, according to a
new federal court report.
The big
losers were stockholders and bondholders with a
stake in Aylsworth's publicly traded company, St.
Louis-based President Casinos Inc.
The big
winner was Aylsworth's boss, the casino company's
chairman and its biggest stockholder, John Connelly.
Connelly is
known in New York City for operating a fleet of
dinner-cruise ships during the 1980s. He later
became an investor in the parent company of the
Circle Line.
In 2002,
President Casinos, which runs a riverboat gambling
vessel in St. Louis, filed for protection from
creditors in federal bankruptcy court in Missouri.
The judge in the case appointed an examiner to
investigate Connelly and Aylsworth.
"There is
evidence to support claims ... for breach of
fiduciary duty against John Connelly, John Aylsworth"
and others, the examiner, David Sosne, said in his
report.
That
evidence comes from a 1997 real estate deal arranged
by Aylsworth, the chief operating officer of
President.
At the
time, Connelly personally needed cash, the examiner
found. Aylsworth, paid more than $680,000 a year as
Connelly's employee, arranged at his boss' request
for President Casinos to buy Connelly's aging,
money-losing Broadwater Resort in Biloxi, Miss.
Connelly
got $40.5 million for the real estate - $30.5
million in cash and a $10 million stake in an entity
set up to run it. Aylsworth, Connelly's grandson,
and a past Circle Line associate - all appointed
company directors by Connelly - voted to okay the
deal.
Aylsworth
arranged bond financing for the purchase from Lehman
Brothers with what amounted to annual interest costs
of 17%.
Sosne
labeled Aylsworth's actions a "breach of the duty of
care." He called Connelly's actions "self-dealing"
and suggested further investigation would likely
prove the deal was worth far less than $40.5
million.
Legal time
limits on lawsuits probably make it impossible for
creditors to sue Aylsworth or Connelly for damages,
the examiner said. But a 1998 stockholder lawsuit
against Aylsworth and Connelly in Delaware could
proceed when the Missouri bankruptcy case finishes.
"We're
pleased that the examiner has finished his work,"
President Casino spokesman Jon Sloane said in a
statement this week. "Based on the report and all
the circumstances surrounding it, we believe that no
further action will be taken."
On Tuesday,
Aylsworth took custody of 4-year-old girls he
fathered in an extramarital affair. A Manhattan
Family Court judge ruled the girls would be better
off with Aylsworth and his wife than with their mom,
Bridget Marks, an actress, novelist and former
Playboy model.
Bogus Sex Rap Turned Tug-of-love into Twins
Nightmare
By Brad Hamilton
New York Post
June 6, 2004
It's the custody battle from hell - and it all began
with a shocking allegation of sex abuse on Easter
Sunday last year. The epic battle pitting ex-Playboy
model Bridget Marks against her former flame,
philandering casino mogul John Aylsworth, has left
their 4-year-old twins deeply scarred, a Post review
of more than 1,000 pages of court documents shows.
"They are very anxious about their parent's conflict
and need therapy ... ASAP," urged the kids' former
psychiatrist, Celia Blumenthal, in one court
document. Marks, 38, lost custody surrendered the
kids in a public hand-off this past week.
The allegation at the heart of the fight started
after blond twins Amber and Scarlett spent Easter
last year with their father in New York. They'd gone
with him to a small luxury apartment on West 73rd
Street he'd bought for his grown daughter Colleen,
one of four adult children Aylsworth and his wife
Karen had during their 34 years of marriage. But
when the girls returned to their home on East 72nd
Street, Amber told their longtime babysitter, Pam
Soleiman, that her Daddy had "touched her pee-pee"
when he took the tot to the bathroom, according to
court
records Marks filed.
Marks
relayed the charge to city's Administration for
Children's Services, and Ehrenfreund was removed as
supervisor. Over the next several months, the charge
would be investigated by cops, ACS and several
experts, including a lead shrink appointed by the
court whose methods and ethics have been questioned
in this and other cases. The psychiatrist, Stephen
Billick and three others would testify that Marks,
38, had coached the kids, prompting Family Court
Judge Arlene Goldberg to award custody last month to
Aylsworth, 54.
The decision baffled court observers and infuriated
Marks. Case documents raise troubling questions
about the behavior of Marks, whose allegations at
first appeared credible, but also cast doubt about
how well the courts handle such charges. It's a
concern echoed last week by the state's top judge,
Judith Kaye, who announced the creation of a
commission to study the role of experts in custody
fights following years of criticism that some
experts were biased or incompetent.
The twins' situation is a case in point. At the very
time that the criminal case was still being
investigated by veteran special-victims Detective
Julia Collins, a second allegation suddenly cropped
up. The new charge followed another supervised visit
Aylsworth had with the kids, this time in Central
Park last July 12, just three months after the
Easter incident. Marks, worried that new supervisor
Jule Roberts might not keep proper tabs on the
girls, had secretly hired a retired city cop, Luther
Barnes, to follow and watch. Her worst fears were
realized when Barnes reported back, showing video of
Roberts sitting on a rock making cell phone calls
while Aylsworth, his wife and the twins disappeared
for an hour. Worse, the babysitter again claimed
Amber complained that she'd been touched by
Aylsworth when he led her to a bathroom in the park.
A few days later, Marks took Amber to Cornell
Medical Center, where the girl was diagnosed as
having vaginitis, an irritation of the genitals.
Blumenthal
urged that Goldberg allow only the most restricted
contact between the girls and their father, who had
sent each toddler an odd gift: a dozen roses for
Valentine's Day. It seemed the allegations were
plausible. But the case began to unravel, partly
because of what one key investigator called Marks'
"arrogant" behavior toward those looking into the
charges.
"She's alienated herself against everybody in ACS,"
said the investigator, who spent weeks interviewing
the parents, family, friends and shrinks, along with
the twins themselves - and asked not to be named in
this story. The investigator said the way the kids
told how they were allegedly abused - quickly and
urgently in the first moments of an interview -
indicated they'd been coached. "You walk into the
room and they blurt it out," she said. "These kids
are really smart, and they know why they're there.
They just want to get it over with." In another
incident, the twins appeared to enjoy a pleasant day
with Aylsworth, only to scream, "You're horrible,
Daddy!" as he drove up to return them home, she
said. "It seemed like they were saying, 'Oh, s--,
We're going back to Mommy," she said. Vaginitis, she
added, "just means it itches. It can happen if a
little soap gets left on."
A report by the court-appointed law guardian, Molly
Murphy, cites numerous interviews with the kids in
which Marks or Soleiman apparently put words into
their mouths. And it slams Marks for making
"evasive, inconsistent" statements. Even so, the
investigator couldn't prove the kids were coached.
And the system continued to fail.
Records
show that the cop in the case, Det. Collins, asked
that the twins be evaluated by a Columbia University
shrink she hailed as the best abuse expert in the
city, to determine once and for all what happened.
But the child's court-appointed law guardian, Molly
Murphy, refused. Meanwhile, Billick's methods were
maddening Marks. Billick, gay and childless, has a
history of favoring fathers, her attorney, Thomas
Shanahan alleges.
In this
case, records show, the shrink expanded his role
from evaluating visitation to looking at custody -
without the judge telling him to do so, as is
required Billick never interviewed the kids'
teachers, nannies or parents of kids they played
with, and lost tapes of key interviews he conducted.
Marks claims he was biased due to a shocking
murder-suicide: His brother, William Billick, lawyer
for the Motion Pictures Association of America,
killed himself and his 18-month-old twins at his
Beverly Hills home in 1997 after his wife threatened
to leave and take the kids.
"He never
should have been on this case," said Shanahan.
Billick has run afoul of other litigants, including
one Manhattan mother, Devorah Shabtai, who lost
custody of her 4-year-old daughter last year based
on Billick's testimony that she was paranoid and
allowed the girl to chase a rat in the park. The
investigator in the Marks case claims Billick
"formed an opinion right away" about the sex
charges, before doing any evaluations. Billick
didn't return calls seeking comment.
He wasn't the only one with biases, Marks alleges.
Two social workers who later claimed the kids were
never abused flew to California last year, staying
with Aylsworth and his family at his beachside
mansion in Malibu. Aylsworth had a networth of more
than $6 million , as of 1999, and owns three homes,
including one in St. Louis, where his riverboat
gambling operation filed for bankruptcy.
|
|
|
|
Love on
the Clock
Mom Gets Only 5 Mins. On Phone with Her Torn-away Twin Girls
By William Sherman & Bob
Port
New York Daily News
June 4, 2004
 |
| Bridget Marks, with photo of
twins in their empty room, talked to girls yesterday for
first time since handover to their father.
|
|
|
Amber and Scarlet
Aylsworth, the 4-year-old twins turned over to their
millionaire dad, spoke to their mom yesterday for the first
time since they were torn from her Tuesday - until dad hung
up after five minutes.
"Scarlet said that
she missed me and she wanted to sleep near me," said
heartbroken Manhattan mom Bridget Marks, 38. "Amber said she
missed me and loved me."
The call was
arranged with a $75-per-hour social worker monitoring. Under
a court order, the twins are on a four-week trip with their
54-year-old father, John Aylsworth, chief operating officer
of President Casino Inc.
"I didn't really
get to say goodbye to Scarlet," Marks said. "John hung up
the phone before I could even say goodbye to Amber."
Marks finally
learned her kids' whereabouts yesterday, two days after
their emotionally charged transfer to Aylsworth.
"I can't really say
where the children are, but wherever the children are, I ask
the American public to keep an eye on them and to smile at
them and be kind to them," the former Playboy model said.
So went another
teary day for Marks, who lost custody of her daughters in
one of the city's most high-profile Family Court battles in
years.
On May 21,
Manhattan Judge Arlene Goldberg awarded custody to Aylsworth
and his wife on the grounds that Marks alienated the girls
against their father and made false accusations that he
sexually abused them.
Aylsworth fathered
the twins during an extramarital affair with Marks, who
reared their girls alone from birth. When Marks dumped
Aylsworth, he sought visitation. When Marks began to
bad-mouth Aylsworth, he sought full custody.
Until this week,
the twins had only visited their dad for two weeks and five
weekends.
Court officials
said New York case law forces a judge to shift custody of
children when a psychiatrist finds a custodial parent
alienating the kids from the other parent. But some experts
say those legal precedents were limited to extreme cases.
"There's a whole
panoply of things the judge could have done," said veteran
divorce lawyer Raoul Felder. "She could have said, 'Let's
revisit it in six months' or she could have given him lots
of visitation."
|
|
If Mommy Cries, It's Goodbye
Judge Orders Stiff Upper Lip During Phone Calls with Twins
By Bob Port and William Sherman
New York Daily News
June 3, 2004
|
 |
| Bridget Marks sits in her daughters'
empty bedroom. |
|
|
Bridget Marks can hardly stop crying in the aching loneliness of
her upper East Side apartment.
Her 4-year-old twin
daughters, Amber and Scarlett, are gone with their toys and
clothes.
Their beds were empty
again yesterday, the second night they were gone. Marks stared
at their photos and cried again when she looked at the videotape
of their recent kindergarten graduation.
But she cannot cry when
she gets to talk on the phone with them during conference calls
supervised and monitored by a social worker who will be paid
$150 an hour to listen in.
"If I do, they'll
terminate the call," said Marks, referring to Family Court Judge
Arlene Goldberg's instructions on how she must behave during any
supervised contact with her children.
Goldberg made that
decision yesterday, according to Marks, who added, "If I show
any emotion, a supervisor will hang up; if I do anything that a
supervisor thinks will upset the children, that's it; if the
girls ask if they can come home, I'm not allowed to speak about
it."
Marks did not get to
talk to them yesterday.
"I don't know where
they are, if they're scared, if they're hungry, if they're
lonely," said Marks. No schedule for phone calls or visitation
has been arranged or set by the judge.
"It's hard for me to be
in the apartment without their laughter, without their chatter,"
she said. "I didn't sleep at all Tuesday night."
Marks, 38, a former
Playboy model and actress, lost custody of her daughters to her
one-time lover, John Aylsworth, a wealthy 54-year-old casino
president. He has four children with Karen Aylsworth, his wife
of 34 years, and grandchildren as well.
The twins were born out
of Aylsworth's extramarital affair with Marks.
But Goldberg awarded
Aylsworth and his wife custody on the grounds that Marks
alienated the girls against their natural father and made false
accusations that he sexually abused them. Aylsworth's wife
testified in court that she will gladly rear her husband's love
children.
Goldberg declined
comment on the case yesterday.
But one top legal
expert familiar with the case said the judge felt she had little
choice.
"It was difficult, but
the mother was not fostering a healthy relationship with [Aylsworth],"
said the expert who declined to be named.
David Bookstaver,
spokesman for the Office of Court Administration said, "Judges
are bound by appellate court rulings and the appellate courts
have made it very clear, in this state, that if there's a
finding of parental alienation, the remedy is removal of the
children."
Marks has vowed to
fight on.
On Monday, she will ask
a federal court judge to stay Goldberg's decision pending a
hearing on various constitutional and civil rights issues.
"Because Judge
Goldberg's decision is not final, we can't appeal it," said
Mark's attorney Tom Shanahan.
"It violates due
process to say I'm taking your children away but you can't
appeal it," he said.
In order to keep
custody, Aylsworth, who lives in Malibu, Calif., and works in
St. Louis, must live in New York with his family. As far as
Marks knows, he has not bought a home here.
"I wish I
knew where Amber and Scarlett are," Marks said last night. "I
hope they're all right."
Jurist Singularly Unsensational till Now
By Barbara Ross and William Sherman
New York Daily News
June 3, 2004
Until recently, Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg had a
reputation for being a diligent jurist who plays it strictly by
the book, carefully following the rule of law.
But that was before she
stripped Bridget Marks of custody of her twins, a controversial
ruling that has triggered outrage and national debate.
"It wasn't easy for the
judge to make this decision, but believe me, she agonized over
it," said an associate, who declined to be identified. "She
looked at all the evidence and previous rulings and appellate
court decisions."
Colleagues say that's
typical of Goldberg, mostly known in legal circles for having a
sharp legal mind and for being careful.
In her 13 years on the
bench, the first 111/2 years in Criminal Court before being
switched to Family Court, there is no record of her rulings
being reversed on appeal.
The 54-year-old judge,
who is single and lives on the upper East Side, worked her way
up through the legal system after graduating from Hunter College
and the Chicago-Kent College of Law.
From 1976 to 1986, she
worked as a Legal Aid Society defense lawyer, and then clerked
for Acting Supreme Court Justice Carol Berkman.
In 1991, then-Mayor
David Dinkins appointed the fellow Democrat to the bench at
Manhattan Criminal Court. There she handled bail applications,
pretrial defense and prosecution motions and was known as a
workaholic, able to move cases along swiftly, pressing lawyers
to meet deadlines.
Except for a stint in a
special narcotics part, she did not preside over trials.
But many big names
appeared before her. She set bail for Tyco International CEO
Dennis Kozlowski; issued a warrant for the arrest of Christopher
Culkin, Macaulay Culkin's father, and dismissed a claim by three
teenagers that former Nets basketball star Derrick Coleman
assaulted them at a bar.
Monitors for Fund for
Modern Courts, which reviews judges' conduct, praised her as
patient, fair, thorough and firm.
In a mostly positive
review, some monitors did note that her courtroom was "not very
orderly."
In December 2002, she
was transferred to Family Court to help handle that court's
increasing caseload.
|
|
Double Dispair
Heartbroken Mom Screams 'I Love You' and Runs After
Car as Fat-cat Father Takes Custody of 4-Year-Old Twins
By: Bob Port
New York Daily News
June 2, 2004
|
 |
| Bridget Marks girds for parting from
Amber and Scarlet. |
|
|
 |
| One of the twins screams for her mom
as shes put into dads car. |
|
|
 |
| President Casino honcho John
Aylsworth is the twins' biological father. |
|
|
 |
| Marks spews at her former lover, then
follows car carrying girls away. |
|
|
Little twin girls in their Sunday best, clutching their mother's
hands as tears filled their eyes, were handed over into the
custody of their father yesterday in a scene marked by anger and
shouting.
It was gut-wrenching
for anyone who watched.
Their mother, Bridget
Marks, crying, chased after the father's car as it slowly pulled
into traffic. "I love you, I love you," she called to her
daughters, who watched helplessly from the car.
"There's the coward,"
Marks' mother shouted as casino bigwig John Aylsworth tried to
go unnoticed. "You evil man," she screamed at the twins' father.
"You are evil!" she
yelled. "How could you do this?"
A social worker pulled
and twisted one child's arm. Then, when Aylsworth neglected to
buckle up the girls after the child safety seats in his car were
too small, Marks screamed at him, "I'll sue you!"
The spectacle, at
midday on the upper East Side, brought grimaces of shock and
sadness to the faces of passersby.
Marks, 38, sobbed
uncontrollably as it ended. She raced into her apartment
building on Third Ave. as a phalanx of news crews pursued.
So went the transfer of
custody of two 4-year-old twin girls from Marks, a former
B-movie actress and now a romance novelist, to Aylsworth, 54,
the chief operating officer of President Casino Inc.
Aylsworth stood
stoically, ignoring all questions. His wife, Karen, also refused
to speak.
For the twins, Amber
and Scarlet Aylsworth, it was nightmarish day. They begged and
pleaded to stay with their mother.
Marks, outraged by New
York's system of custody law, has gone public in her battle with
Aylsworth. "This is outrageous," she said yesterday. "I can't
believe this is happening."
Last month, Manhattan
Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg ordered Marks to hand over
her daughters to Aylsworth. The judge, relying on New York's
history of parental alienation case law, ruled that Marks
despises Aylsworth so much she cannot be trusted to foster a
father-daughter relationship.
New York law requires
the twins, despite the temporary trauma they will endure, to be
placed with their father, the judge ruled.
The twins were born to
Marks after she began an affair with the married Aylsworth in
1998. When Marks became pregnant, Aylsworth and his wife
pressured her to have an abortion. She refused, rearing the
girls on her own.
Marks ended the
relationship in late 2002 and Aylsworth filed for visitation
rights. When she accused him of sexually molesting their
daughters, he upped his claim to custody and won when the judge
concluded that Marks had coached the kids to implicate their
father.
The case has tapped a
well of dissatisfaction with divorce and custody courts that
runs deep in New York City.
The Daily News reported
on Marks' case in late March. It has since gained national
attention; Marks appeared on ABC's "Good Morning America" and
Court TV yesterday.
Lawyers for Marks were
unsuccessful in getting an emergency restraining order.
Manhattan Federal Judge Kimba Wood, on duty to hear emergency
requests, scheduled a hearing for Monday before Federal Judge
George Daniels.
Tom Shanahan, Marks'
attorney, said Wood ruled that immediate action was not
necessary. "A one-week vacation for the girls cannot constitute
irreparable harm," he said.
"The upside is there
will be a hearing in a week," Shanahan said. "My client will be
here, her supporters will be here. The child psychiatrist will
be here. We can make our argument then."
Marks is suing
Aylsworth, the State of New York, its court system and Judge
Goldberg in federal court. She also sued Lawyers for Children
Inc., a child advocacy law firm appointed to represent her
twins, and Dr. Stephen Billick, a court-appointed psychiatrist
who recommended she lose custody.
The suit claims
violations of civil rights, due process and equal protection. It
seeks the appointment of a special master to investigate the
conduct of the judge and the other defendants.
A sworn statement from
Celia Blumental, a therapist for the two girls for four months
in 2003, contends that irreparable harm will occur to the twins
if Goldberg's order is not stopped.
"I don't understand the
mentality of people that would do something like this to
children," Marks said last night.
"I don't even know
where the kids are," she said. "This is a mother's worst
nightmare."
With
Robert Gearty
|
Tug-of-love Ends in
Agony
By Brad Hamilton and Heidi
Singer
New York Post
June 2, 2004
The ex-Playboy model who
lost custody of her twin girls for coaching them to say their father
was a molester bid a heart-wrenching and very public goodbye
yesterday, handing off the 4-year-olds to a man they call "Daddy"
but hardly know.
Sobbing mom Bridget Marks
hollered, "Evil!" at casino owner and former beau John Aylsworth as
he and his wife, Karen, picked up the girls in front of Marks' East
72nd Street home.
As he piled them into his
sedan, Marks yanked
rom the
vehicle and held it up as a car seat for
HEARTBREAK:
evidence that Aylsworth
couldn't care for
Bridget Marks, who coached her twin her kids,
Amber and Scarlet.
girls to falsely call their dad a molester,
bids them goodbye yesterday.
They're
putting in car seats that aren't even
N.Y. Post: David Rentas "fastened!"
she yelled through tears. "That's
not the right way to do it!" Marks, 38, lost custody of
the kids last month after Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg ruled
she coaxed the twins to lie and say their father sexually abused
them a violation of state child custody law, which punishes
parents who make false sexual allegations.
The girls were born from a
1998 affair Marks had with Aylsworth, whose wife of 34 years knew
about the liaison.
Aylsworth and his wife
urged Marks to get an abortion, but she refused, then raised the
kids as a single mom.
Yesterday, Marks had hoped
her attorney could win an 11th-hour stay of Goldberg's custody order
in Manhattan federal court.
But the federal judge put
off the matter until next week and the Aylsworths showed up to
whisk the girls to their new life.
The twins, outfitted in
matching dresses and each clutching a doll, looked terrified. They
burst into tears when Marks bent down and squeezed them in front of
reporters and photographers as they left the apartment building at
about 2:30 p.m.
Aylsworth, 54, hurried with
them to the car as Marks' mother, Molly Bennett Aitken, screamed,
"He's running like a rat!"
When the vehicle pulled
away, Marks chased after it briefly, wailing, "I love you!"
The girls waved back.
Aylsworth has not moved to
New York from his home in Malibu, Calif., as Goldberg ordered, and
for now will stay with the twins at his daughter Colleen's West 73rd
Street apartment.
Aylsworth runs a riverboat
casino operation in St. Louis and has admitted to multiple affairs.
Marks, a romance novelist
and former actress, maintains that Aylsworth has behaved in a
sexually inappropriate way with the girls.
The circus-like farewell
which could have been avoided with a quiet departure from the
building's underground garage came after Manhattan federal Judge
Kimba Wood denied Marks' bid for a temporary restraining order. She
transferred the matter to Judge George Daniels, who's on vacation
until Monday.
Marks' motion attacks the
credibility of the court experts in her case, including psychiatrist
Stephen Billick, saying the doctor should have recused himself
because of a gruesome family tragedy that biased his opinions.
Billick's brother William,
an entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles, shot and killed himself and
his twin kids after his wife announced she would leave him and take
the children, according to the motion, prepared by Marks' lawyer,
Thomas Shanahan, and judicial activist Anthony DeRosa.
It also cites a previously
undisclosed report by Chief Administrative Judge Jonathan Lippman
that casts doubt on the value and motives of testimony from
court-appointed experts.
The report says lucrative
appointments go to experts who are friends with judges or have
politically connections.
"We have documented a wide
range of problems that regularly arise in these cases in courts
throughout the state," it says.
Because Goldberg has not
fully entered her ruling with the court, and won't until July, Marks
was prevented from appealing the decision to the appellate court.
"It's bizarre," Shanahan
said of the ruling. "She takes the kids from a loving home and gives
them to a man who hasn't even established residence."
Marks is allowed only
supervised visitation, and will have to pay for a court-appointed
supervisor whenever she meets the kids to prevent further
undermining of the twins' relationship with their dad, Goldberg
said.
Marks' looming legal battle
could rock the state court system if the feds rule that testimony
from outside experts is unreliable.
The problem of tainted
experts "is not an anomaly it's happening in courts across the
country," said Amy Neustein, a public advocate and custody expert
who lost her daughter Sherry in 1989 to an abusive father.
|
3 Broken Hearts
Cruel Court Ruling Rips Twins From Mom
Today
|
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
June 1, 2004 |
 |
| Bridget Marks holds her teary twins,
Amber (l.) and Scarlet, who spent yesterday with their mom
before going to live with biological dad today, as ordered
by N.Y. Family Court. |
|
|
Bridget Marks will lose her 4-year-old twin daughters today -
and it's going to cost her more than $1,000 a day to visit them
and as much as $150 an hour to talk to them on the phone.
A state judge has
ordered supervised visitation for the 38-year-old Manhattan mom.
The children's wealthy father, Marks said, is insisting she pay
for court-appointed social workers, who charge between $100 and
$150 per hour.
"That's more than
$1,000 a day," Marks said yesterday, as she packed her
children's luggage and struggled to fight back tears. "I don't
have the money to pay for that."
At noon today, Marks, a
former Playboy model and actress about to publish her first
romance novel, will experience heartbreak as few mothers do.
She will have to say
goodbye to identical twins she reared alone from birth, all
because of a judge's order.
In one of New York's
most unusual child custody battles ever, Manhattan Family Court
Judge Arlene Goldberg awarded custody of the twins to their
father, 54-year-old casino executive John Aylsworth.
Goldberg decreed that
although Marks is a fit mother, it is in the best interests of
her children that they live with their father because of Marks'
"unbridled anger" toward him.
Aylsworth, chief
operating officer of President Casino Inc., a riverboat gambling
business based in St. Louis, fathered the twins during an
extramarital affair with Marks.
Under the judge's
order, Aylsworth and his wife of 34 years, Karen, 53, will move
to New York.
Yesterday, Amber and
Scarlet Aylsworth played their favorite board game, Candyland,
sang songs and watched a video of their preschool graduation as
their mother sobbed.
"Kiki," a lame pet
Chihuahua the twins nursed back to health, got a wet goodbye
kiss. Their father refuses to take their dog, Marks said.
"No!" Amber shouted,
when asked if she wanted to live with her daddy, who apparently
has told Amber she can now call his wife Karen her mommy.
Scarlet started to
explain how she wants to stay with her real mother, but her lip
quivered and she broke down into tears.
Amber frowned as she
watched her sister. Then, they hugged their mother as all three
wept in one another's arms.
In her ruling, Goldberg
cited cases where New York appeals judges have declared children
better off leaving a parent who badmouths the other parent.
But even a strong
supporter of that principle in custody law, psychologist Richard
Warshak of Dallas, said less severe remedies - like counseling
for the accusatory parent and liberal visitation for the
estranged parent - may make more sense for young children in a
stable home.
"The idea that there
should be an automatic transfer of custody is wrong," said
Warshak, often labeled a father's-rights advocate and author of
"Divorce Poison: Protecting the Parent-Child Bond from a
Vindictive Ex."
Aylsworth and his wife
have refused to speak to the press.
But the case has turned
Marks into an outspoken critic of New York's Family Court. "This
is a disgusting example of how people drunk with their own power
ruin lives and destroy children," she said. "It is savage."
|
Last
Custody Shot for Playboy Mom
By Brad Hamilton
New York Post
June 1, 2004
Lawyers for a former Playboy model
set to lose custody of her twin 4-year-old girls to their married
father will make a last-ditch effort to block the handover today.
Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg
has ruled that Bridget Marks, 38, coached the girls to say their
father molested them. But Marks contends that a court-appointed
psychiatrist and four social workers lied, leading the judge to
award custody to married casino exec John Aylsworth, 54, with whom
Marks had an affair.
"I have proof that all the social
workers in this case, in one way, shape or form, lied," said Marks
last night.
Lawyer Thomas Shanahan said he will
file papers in Manhattan federal court citing an internal report for
the court system that acknowledges favoritism and other
"inappropriate factors" have plagued the system of appointments.
The complaint names among others
Aylsworth, Goldberg, forensic psychiatrist Stephen Billick, law
guardian Molly Murphy, Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and the
state's Unified Court System as defendants.
Marks has been ordered to hand over
the girls, Scarlet and Amber, to Aylsworth at noon today.
"This is a tragedy," said Marks.
"It's a nice household and I'm certainly not deserving of losing my
children."
|
Judge Says Mom
Lied, So She'll Lose Custody
|
| |
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
May 30, 2004
|
 |
| Bridget Marks and daughters Amber
(l.) and Scarlet share laughs on Monday. |
|
|
Why would a judge take two thriving, giggly 4-year-old twin
girls away from their loving, doting mother and the happy
Manhattan home they have known since birth?
Manhattan Family Court
Judge Arlene Goldberg decided to do it because she believes the
mother falsely accused the father of sexually fondling their
children to prevent him from gaining custody. The father, the
judge believes, is innocent.
Now, mom so hates dad,
Goldberg decided, that the twins are better off with their
father, a busy, traveling casino executive who years ago slept
with their mother while he cheated, as he frequently has, on his
loyal wife.
That, in a nutshell, is
the case of John Aylsworth vs. Bridget Marks. It's a bitter
custody fight involving a millionaire CEO and a former Playboy
model that is about to test the changing boundaries of state
family law.
Marks carried her twins
through pregnancy despite pressure from Aylsworth and his wife
to get an abortion, according to court testimony. "He didn't
take me to court," Marks said, "until I refused to have sex with
him anymore."
The Daily News first
reported the story in late March.
On Tuesday, lawyers for
Marks plan to go to federal court for a restraining order and to
challenge the constitutionality of New York's custody process.
Marks will bare her outrage on Court TV's Catherine Crier talk
show that night.
Reports are being
prepared by "Dateline NBC" and ABC's "2-0/20." Dozens of people
phoned The News Friday enraged by Goldberg's ruling, wanting to
protest, write letters and raise hell.
"This is one tough
decision," said Hal Mayerson, co-chairman of the state bar
association's custody law committee. "This is such a rare
decision, but this judge had to make a decision."
For more than a decade,
New York's higher courts have been embracing as gospel a concept
psychologists still debate - that when one parent wrongly
bad-mouths the other by alleging sexual abuse, children are
better served if custody goes to the accused.
The accused, the
reasoning goes, can then counteract an accuser's damaging
behavior.
First termed "parental
alienation" in 1985 by the late Columbia University psychiatrist
Richard Gardner, who tried to define the behavior as a mental
illness, the theory quickly became standard offense or defense
in custody cases.
Many New York judges
bought it. Meanwhile, some researchers dismissed Gardner's
theories as junk science while others moderated his ideas and
refined them.
Today, parental
alienation has new names and more subtle definitions. Some
states treat it as "generally accepted" science while some
judges reject it as quackery.
But in New York, many
parents are stunned to learn parental alienation, as Gardner
conceived it, is the law. The official remedy in one New York
appeals ruling after another: Hand over the kids to the parent
wrongly accused of perversion.
Goldberg cited this
line of cases in ruling against Marks.
Abuse accusations are,
as Mayerson puts it, "the atom bomb in custody cases."
But Marks sees her
punishment as a hydrogen bomb for her children and says the
judge has overreacted. Goldberg found that Marks had coached her
children "to say their father had 'touched their peepee,'" but
Marks vehemently denies this. Her concerns, she said, are rooted
in a pattern of her former lover's crude language and
overbearing physical touching.
Aylsworth
refuses to speak to the press.
A review of records and
videotapes from the case backs up Marks. The judge had no hard
evidence to support her finding - only opinions from a
court-appointed psychiatrist, two social workers and a
children's lawyer.
The judge ignored three
contradictory opinions from experts hired by Marks and testimony
about how Aylsworth "made inappropriate comments about the
beauty of the children's genitalia."
Carol Bruch, professor
of family law at the University of California at Davis, is a
frequent critic of alienation becoming a ruling principal in
custody. "Parental alienation is a crock," she said. "It's snake
oil."
|
|
She Lost
Teary Mom in Custody
Fight
Slams
'Heartless' Legal System
|
| |
By Bob Port
New York Daily News
May 28, 2004
|
 |
| Bridget Marks looks
adoringly at daughters she'll have to hand over
to their rich dad. |
|
|
A
Manhattan mom will have to bid a heartrending
goodbye to her little twin daughters in four days
after an appeals judge paved the way yesterday for
the children to be turned over to their wealthy
father.
Former
Playboy model Bridget Marks vowed to battle to the
end to keep President Casino Inc. executive John
Aylsworth from getting custody of the 4-year-old
girls.
"I will
fight this," Marks said. "I will fight this wherever
I have to go."
While
Marks' plea for an emergency order halting the
transfer of the girls went unheeded yesterday, she
was given a glimmer of hope.
In an
unusual move, an appeals judge invited Marks to
return for a hearing in five weeks - unless a lower
court judge issues a more detailed explanation of
her custody ruling.
It marked
the latest twist in the tug of war over twins born
to Marks, a 38-year-old former actress and
model-turned-romance novelist. Their 54-year-old
married father sued Marks last year after their
affair turned sour.
Last week,
Manhattan Family Court Judge Arlene Goldberg stunned
Marks by ordering the girls transferred to Aylsworth,
and restricting her to supervised visits.
"I am
horrified," Marks said yesterday. "I am appalled at
the insensitivity of the legal system to the needs
of my small children."
"This is
draconian, heartless and cold-blooded," she said.
"If
anything is going to emotionally damage my children,
it's this process, not me," she said, pledging to
continue her legal battle.
Aylsworth's
attorney, Patricia Grant, noted, "a stay is rarely
granted in this kind of case," and said she believes
Marks' appeal will fail.
Grant said
Goldberg has promised to supply a more detailed
court order soon.
The case
promises to test the boundaries of a growing claim
in New York custody law that is loosely called
"parental alienation."
In an
unusually brief six-page order issued last Friday,
Goldberg declared Marks' anger toward her ex-lover
is so likely to poison the twins' relationship with
their father that they are better off living with
him.
While the
change "will be stressful and traumatic," the judge
wrote, "to leave the children in her custody would
expose them to further emotional damage and likely
make a healthy and wholesome father-daughter
relationship impossible."
In a
concession to Marks, the judge said Aylsworth must
move to New York from his Malibu, Calif., home.
Aylsworth intends to move here, probably to
Manhattan, with his wife, Karen, who would become a
caretaker to the children.
The ruling
prompted Marks to seek an emergency stay yesterday.
She wants
more explanation of why she cannot see her daughters
without supervision, where they will go to school
and precisely what kind of home their father will
provide.
Without an
appellate judge willing to intervene - for now - the
ruling means Amber and Scarlet Aylsworth will be
tearfully handed over to their father at noon
Tuesday.
Dad will
keep them for a one-month vacation. Phone calls with
mom will be monitored. When the girls return to New
York, mom will get a one-week supervised visit.
The girls
spent the week at play near their upper East Side
home. They visited a private kindergarten they may -
or may not - attend this fall.
"I got
their uniforms for school," Marks said.
"But I
don't know," she said, beginning to cry, "whether
they'll use them or not."
|
|
|
Tug-of-War Girls Home - for Now
Twins Visited Calif. Dad
By William Sherman and
Bob Port
New York
Daily News
March 29, 2004
The twin daughters of a
former Playboy pinup were home in New York yesterday from a
court-mandated visit to the California dad who is fighting for
custody of them.
"The girls are back
home," said a person close to Bridget Marks, 37, the socialite
model and romance novelist embroiled in a bitter court dispute
with John Aylsworth, 54, president of President Casinos Inc.
Although Marks has
reared 4-year-old twins Amber and Scarlet in her upper East Side
home since their birth, both a psychiatrist and a law guardian
have recommended that Aylsworth be given full custody of them.
Aylsworth, a married
grandfather who lives in Malibu, fathered the girls during an
affair with Marks, who is single and now engaged.
Manhattan Family Court
Justice Arlene Goldberg is expected to issue a custody ruling on
April 21.
Meanwhile, the twins
finished a week-long visit with Aylsworth on Saturday.
Marks said yesterday
her lawyers have told her not to comment while a judge considers
a gag order against her sought by Aylsworth, who could not be
reached for comment.
Family law experts
say Aylsworth's sweeping requests to remove children from an
extramarital affair to another coast - and do it with judicially
sanctioned secrecy - are rare in New York courts.
"I haven't seen it,"
said Manhattan divorce lawyer Marty Johnson, former
chairman of the family law committee of the state Bar
Association. "It's a pretty drastic measure absent some real
countervailing reasons."
A Pinup, a Mogul and Their
Custody Battle
|
By William Sherman and Bob Port
New York Daily News
March 27, 2004
She was a Playboy model.
He's a married multi-millionaire. Now, the twin daughters born
of their affair could be ripped from their mom and sent to live
with the man they hardly know and his wife.
|
 |
| Bridget Marks with her 4-year-old
twins Scarlet and Amber. |
|
|
 |
| Aylsworth |
|
|
Special Report -
A steamy bicoastal love affair between a multi-millionaire
married grandfather and a sexy Manhattan socialite has spawned
one of the most vicious and unusual child-custody disputes in
the city's history.
The courtroom battle,
waged in secret until now, is over Amber and Scarlet Aylsworth,
4-year-old identical twins who were born out of an affair
between John Aylsworth, 54, of California, who cheated on his
wife, and Bridget Marks, 37, a former Playboy pinup, B-movie
actress and romance novelist.
Aylsworth,
who runs a casino gambling company, is demanding the twins be
taken from their mother, who has reared them since birth in her
East Side apartment.
"I am a mother who is
trying to keep her children," Marks said. "Every time I went to
court I was slapped down. It's been abysmal. It's like
functioning in another dimension where reality is immaterial. If
they would give me my children, I would walk through fire. He
won't settle for anything but full custody. He hates me."
Aylsworth
wants the girls moved to his palatial seaside estate in Malibu,
Calif., where he lives with Karen Aylsworth, his wife of more
than 30 years.
She supports his
demands even though she testified that she was devastated when
she learned her husband's lover was pregnant, and pressed for an
abortion.
Legal experts said such
a ruling, due to be handed down April 21, would be
unprecedented.
"I've never heard of a
case like this," said Hal Mayerson, chairman of the Family Law
committee of the New York City Bar Association and a veteran
divorce lawyer.
"If they allow the
children to be taken to California, they will effectively remove
this mother from the children's lives," Mayerson said. "That
should only be done under the most dire circumstances."
But so far, John
Aylsworth is winning Aylsworth vs. Marks, a saga now playing out
in Manhattan Family Court before Justice Arlene Goldberg.
Both a court-appointed
law guardian - a lawyer chosen to represent the children's
interests - and a court-appointed psychiatrist have urged the
judge to take the children from their mother.
Aylsworth
refused to discuss his custody claim. "We have no comment," he
said. "We think a media story is totally inappropriate."
Marks, in tears at
times, said in an interview that the experts are biased against
her.
"Obviously, my children
want to live with me," she said. "They have their friends and
their family and their toys. This is not the case where there's
the breakup of a marital home. This is the only home they have
ever known."
Marks, a Smith College
grad with a master's in international relations from New York
University, appeared nude on horseback in a 1992 Playboy feature
on New York City debutantes.
A stunning redhead, she
has appeared in "Thinner," a movie adaptation of a Stephen King
novel, and "The Kings of Brooklyn," a never-released film. Her
father, Alvin Marks, 93, a Massachusetts physicist who was
science adviser to President Kennedy, told Playboy that his
daughter was "my best invention."
Marks' first novel,
"September," a 9/11 love story, is due in bookstores in July.
Aylsworth,
a certified public accountant who amassed a fortune in the oil
business, is now president and chief operating officer of a
gambling operation, President Casinos, which includes a St.
Louis, Mo., riverboat and a Biloxi, Miss., beach resort.
Aylsworth's
company went bankrupt in 2000 after defaulting on $100 million
worth of bonds.
Asked why he is
fighting so hard to take away children from an extramarital
affair, Aylsworth said, "The reason is well documented through
court records."
Those records detail
Marks' allegations that Aylsworth has been grossly inappropriate
in his behavior with the twins and countercharges that Marks is
an unfit mother.
Aylsworth,
who spends much of his time in St. Louis, contends Marks is
alienating the children against him.
Marks has resigned
herself to let him visit his daughters in New York.
Aylsworth
refused to acknowledge paternity when he and his wife showed up
at the hospital the day after Amber and Scarlet were born,
according to testimony.
A few months earlier,
Aylsworth and his wife told Marks to abort the children they now
want, testimony shows.
"I was beyond
devastated and very pro-choice, and I told Bridget that I
thought Bridget should have an abortion," Karen Aylsworth
testified in court.
Marks said, "I didn't
know he was married when we first met because he doesn't wear a
wedding ring. "We never lived together," she said.
The custody fight has
cost both sides more than $1.3 million. Marks said she's broke
and owes lawyers some $700,000.
The big bills include
fees for court-appointed experts, such as a psychiatrist who
charged $42,500, and social workers hired at $200 an hour to
supervise visits in New York and Malibu.
What surprised Marks
was the behavior of law guardians appointed to represent the
interests of her twins. The judge gave that job to Lawyers for
Children, a public-interest law firm paid by the court to
represent impoverished foster children and child-abuse victims
in Family Court.
The firm sent its
lawyer to Malibu to spend time with the father and children.
In writing, Lawyers for
Children recommended custody go to Aylsworth, provided he and
his wife move to New York. Then, the firm's lawyer, Molly
Murphy, changed her recommendation in the judge's chambers to
say the children should be moved to California, Marks said.
Officials at Lawyers
for Children declined comment.
This week, Aylsworth
asked the judge to issue a gag order to prevent Marks from
discussing the case. His attorney asked to eject visitors from a
public courtroom as the gag order was debated.
The judge refused to
eject the visitors and is considering the gag order.
Meanwhile, Amber and
Scarlet giggle and play with their mother, oblivious to the ugly
fight over their home. They said they love their private
preschool. An exclusive private kindergarten has accepted them
for the fall.
After a recent
snowstorm, the twins put on their matching pink parkas and
skipped off to go ice skating at Wollman Rink in Central Park.
"It's just breaking my
heart," Marks said. "I don't know what I would do if I lost
them."
Nights at the
Plaza & a marriage proposal
They met in 1998 at the
Manhattan dinner party of a mutual lawyer friend.
John Aylsworth was the
rich fiftysomething playboy casino operator. Bridget Marks was
the thirtysomething former Playboy pin-up girl.
A torrid clandestine
romance followed, with trysts at the Plaza hotel and other
love-making landmarks.
"She thought he was
wonderful," said Molly Bennett Aitken, Marks' mother, who owns
the 83-acre Green Gables Farm in Athol, Mass.
"He asked her to marry
him," Aitken said. "His wife was living with another man - they
had an open marriage."
Aylsworth
gave Marks a $7,000 diamond ring, and the couple took many trips
together, including to Los Angeles and St. Louis.
Not long into their
romance, Marks became pregnant.
"I was shocked,
traumatized," Aylsworth recalled in court. "I take full
responsibility for the pregnancy for these children. She led me
to believe she was on birth-control pills when, in fact, she
wasn't."
Even after Marks gave
birth to twin girls, her sexual liaisons with Aylsworth
continued sporadically.
During this period,
Aylsworth met Aitken at her daughter's East Side apartment. He
emerged naked from the bedroom to say hello.
"I said, 'Would you
please put some clothes on?'" Aitken recalled. "He said,
'There's nothing wrong with the human body.' I thought at that
point he was off the wall."
In court, Aylsworth
said he had no plans to marry Marks.
"I knew I was not going
to marry her," he testified. "I, you know, getting pregnant and
having children and then subsequently making a decision about
marriage are two different things."
Judge: Pawn 35G
ring
Forensic psychiatrist
Dr. Stephen Bates Billick charged $400 an hour to evaluate
Aylsworth, Marks and the twin girls and make a recommendation.
He also billed $5,000 a day to testify in court and $10,400 to
write his report.
Marks had agreed to
bear half the cost of Billick and was told to expect to pay
$2,000 or $3,000.
When her debt to
Billick reached $14,000, Marks balked, and Judge Goldberg took a
hard line.
According to court
transcripts, Marks pleaded, "I have no money, so I don't know
what to do. I have to feed my children."
"If it's not paid, then
there could be contempt," Goldberg responded.
Later, the judge
suggested Marks pawn her engagement ring from her fiancι, a
high-ranking executive at Citigroup. "She has a $35,000 ring,"
Goldberg said. "So there's property at the very least from which
she can obtain the funds."
Marks, who was being
helped out financially by her mother, asked Billick several
times for an itemized bill.
"I haven't typed it up,
but I will type it up for you, the phone calls and everything,"
Billick replied, according to a tape-recorded conversation.
"He never provided it,"
Marks said.
On the witness stand,
Billick called Marks narcissistic and delusional. Marks' mother
and fiancι helped her hire three experts to rebut his testimony.
Billick
did not respond to telephone calls.
The Divorce
Experts
Divorce Expert Eyed for Covering His Assets
By Brad Hamilton
New York Post
June 27, 2004
An accountant tapped to
help clean up the state's matrimonial courts is under
investigation by the FBI for allegedly making crooked
evaluations in cases before embattled Manhattan Supreme Court
Justice Marylin Diamond, The Post has learned.
Numbers cruncher John
R. Johnson whom Donna Hanover hired in her divorce from Rudy
Giuliani also failed to disclose to litigants his involvement
in an Internet venture with other divorce experts, spurring
conflict-of-interest complaints, documents show.
State Chief Judge
Judith Kaye this month named Johnson to the Matrimonial
Commission, a 27-
member group charged
with recommending reforms in divorce and custody proceedings.
The commission was
formed following accusations of bias against purportedly neutral
experts appointed to divorce cases.
The feds are looking
into complaints about Johnson stemming from divorce squabbles in
which he evaluated marital assets.
The cases in Diamond's
court include the divorces of millionaire lawyer Gail Koff, head
of the Jacoby & Meyers law firm, and fashion designer Cathy
Hardwick.
Johnson determined that
Jacoby & Meyers had zero net worth a finding that supported
Diamond's ruling. She had ruled that Koff's husband, architect
Ralph Brill, was responsible for half of the firm's $8 million
debt from tax problems.
"I got socked," Brill
said.
Johnson also said that
Hardwick's name had no value. But Hardwick's ex-husband, Tom
Snowdon, said that within months of Johnson's zero-value report
on the designer's name, she went on QVC hawking her wares.
"There was a fix in,
simple as that," said Snowdon.
He added: "My ex-wife
was worth $4 million, and I've been left bankrupt."
Court spokesman David
Bookstaver declined to comment, and Johnson could not be
reached.
|
These Folks Spell Divorce
'M-O-N-E-Y'
When Couples Split, It's a Bonanza for
Court-appointed Guardians.
They Make a Fortune as Advocates for the Children Involved.
|
By William Sherman and
Bob Port
New York Daily News
May 30, 2004
|
 |
| Ron Perelman |
|
|
For an elite group of
court-appointed attorneys and psychiatrists, the city's
divorce courts are a multimillion-dollar feeding trough,
enriching them with little scrutiny or oversight.
They are assigned
by judges to represent the interests of children, the prize
in brutal custody battles.
Their opinions on
who is the better parent and who should get the kids carry
tremendous weight with those judges.
Among those who
have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for their
services are Ron Perelman and Patricia Duff, John McEnroe
and Tatum O'Neal, Woody Allen, actress Lori Singer, Judith
Regan and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
The not so rich and
famous, including warring middle-class couples, get the big
bills as well.
All have to pay in
full with little or no choice under court regulations.
Duff, whose divorce
from Revlon magnate Perelman became a spectacle, is still
getting bills from Jo Ann Douglas, former law guardian for
her daughter even though appeals in Duff's case ended in
2001.
Douglas already has
been paid more than $600,000 in that case. Recently, she
billed another $28,000 for mediating disputes over the
child's phone calls to her mother, according to Duff, who
paid a third of the tab while Perelman paid the rest.
"There are no
rules," said Duff.
"It's all a game
and the name of the game is money," said Regan, the best
seller publisher.
Her divorce lurched
through the courts from 1992 through 2001.
Regan had to pay a
small fortune for her daughter's law guardian in addition to
several psychiatrists.
"They want to keep
running the meter," Regan said. "I got a call from a
psychiatrist. He said, 'Be here on Tuesday and bring a check
for $20,000 with you.' That was up-front.
"They suck the life
out of you, they suck the money out of you," she said. "And
this is not sour grapes - I won!"
Defenders of the
court appointments say parents battling over custody have
willingly entered the system and have to pay the price.
Parents charge each
other with abuse, emotional instability and aberrant
behavior. Because children are often pawns in their parents'
war, psychiatrists and psychologists have to test and
examine family members, say experts in the field. Law
guardians have to be appointed to represent children's
interests.
"It's a valuable
tool [for judges] to get to the truth of the matter when
both sides are involved in a heated emotional dispute," said
Judge Anne Pfau, the state's first deputy administrative
judge.
But Pfau and the
state's Office of Court Administration acknowledged problems
in the system. A special panel chaired by Judge Sondra
Miller has been assigned to examine matrimonial law
practice, including fees for court appointees and the
appointment process.
Last year, the
court system set new rules designed to curb favoritism in
appointments and fees. However, the Daily News found that
the same lawyers still get most of the appointments,
particularly in Manhattan.
Three of the 69
lawyers eligible received 13 of the 25 law-guardian jobs
doled out through early April after the new rules went into
effect last June.
The three are
lawyers who have won such appointments for years.
In Queens, 13 of 78
lawyers eligible got 45 appointments. Five of those lawyers
are active in the Democratic Party, which controls
judgeships.
The new rules also
say that law guardians in state Supreme Court cases have to
publicly disclose their appointments and fees.
But none of the
appointees in Manhattan and only one in Queens had filed the
compensation forms - even though several parents interviewed
said they are getting bills as large as $20,000.
In Brooklyn,
however, the judges and law guardians appear to be following
the rules. That began only after a crackdown and continuing
investigation into corruption by District Attorney Charles
Hynes.
Pfau
was put in charge of the Brooklyn Supreme Court judges and
she said she instituted new measures to make the system
"bulletproof" against judicial corruption.
The court-appointed
psychiatrists are another matter. For them, the cash
register is open with no regulation, no disclosure and no
salary caps. Several psychiatrists charge $5,000 a day for
their testimony.
Breaking up wasn't
always this hard - or quite this expensive.
In 1990, a New York
court ruling opened the door to judges anointing a "law
guardian" to represent the best interests of children.
Judges make mothers
and fathers pay this third lawyer's fee, sometimes splitting
the bill 50-50, other times 65-35, or paid in full by one
parent, depending on who has the most resources.
"The law guardians
become adjunct judges," said Barry Berkman, a matrimonial
lawyer here for more than 25 years.
"Working in an
adversarial atmosphere, they often force the kids to take
sides," Berkman said. "The kids end up feeling guilty and
angry, and what's meant to be in their best interests' ends
up hurting them."
The rules now
require training to become a law guardian, but that training
and certification consists of one day in a classroom.
"It's a sham. It's
wrong. It's really wrong," said Patricia Grant, a divorce
lawyer here for 18 years.
The News also found
highly questionable billing practices, with no apparent
screening by judges.
Appointees bill at
an hourly rate and are supposed to keep records of how they
spent their time. But sometimes parents can't decipher them
or don't get them.
Gennady Gorelik,
who lost a lengthy Brooklyn Supreme Court custody battle for
his two sons, noticed one inconsistency involving two
appointees.
"The law guardian,
Cheryl Solomon, billed for 59 conversations with
psychologist Marie Weinstein, but Weinstein only billed for
24 conversations with Solomon," said Gorelik.
Gorelik's
lawyer, Frederick Schneider, questioned Weinstein during the
trial.
"Weinstein said: I
didn't bill for all the time I spent speaking to Solomon,
and Ms. Solomon's account is more accurate,'" Schneider
recalled. "That was it."
Weinstein declined
to return phone calls on the incident. Solomon declined
comment.
Those who refuse to
pay bills in protest can be threatened with contempt by
judges or lawsuits by the appointees. While New York
provides consumers with an arbitration system for disputing
lawyer fees, court-appointed lawyers are exempt.
In some cases, law
guardians have obtained judge-approved property liens
against those who don't pay bills.
"There is no
mechanism to appeal or oppose a psychiatrist's bills in
these cases," said Raoul Felder, the city's premier divorce
lawyer.
In fact, virtually
every divorce attorney contacted by The News said that law
guardians and forensic mental health experts are cures that
are often worse than the disease.
"The whole thing is
a train wreck waiting to happen," said Felder, who
represented Giuliani in his divorce.
|
|
|
She's Queen Fee, of Courts
|
| |
By William Sherman and Bob Port
New York Daily News
May 29, 2004
|
|
For years, Jo Ann Douglas has raked in hundreds of thousands of
dollars from parents in a little-known side business of divorce
court child-custody battles.
She's appointed by
judges to represent the interests of the children, her title is
law guardian, and the warring parents pay the bills.
At 52, she is the queen
of the small club that gets most of the business, with more than
35 appointments from judges in recent years.
Under court rules her
$300-an-hour bills become, legally, a court order, and she has
been paid more than $600,000 over the years for one case alone.
She has had many of the
big ones: Rudy Giuliani, Woody Allen, John McEnroe.
And she has very low
overhead.
She meets children at
an East Village apartment adjacent to another apartment where
she lives with 17 noisy dogs and three cats, according to one
frightened mother ordered to pay a recent visit. She has also
met clients at a nearby Starbucks.
Douglas' home is
registered as a nonprofit dog shelter called K9 Kastle Corp.
Former Mayor Giuliani, who was ordered to pay Douglas to
represent his teenagers during his divorce, calls her "the dog
lady."
At the same time, she
enjoys good relationships with the judges who appoint her.
While some parents and
lawyers called her "star-struck" or biased, and questioned her
bills and recordkeeping, other lawyers praised the quality of
her work and her dedication to the children who are her clients.
All agreed on her
tenacity as bill collector.
Fail to pay Douglas or
withhold payment in protest and liens will be filed - like the
court-enforced $20,000 debt attached to publisher Judith Regan's
co-op apartment.
"I didn't discover it
until I went to sell," said Regan, who called law guardians
"parasites and bloodsuckers who take a look at your income and
then figure out how much they can make."
Douglas declined to be
interviewed, but her spokesman, Bob Liff, said her fees are
reasonable, she's entitled to be paid what she's owed and that
she is in compliance with court regulations.
"I do not represent or
work for the parent, or owe them any disclosure that would
undercut my commitment to those children," Douglas said in a
statement.
|
For
Arbiters in Custody Battles,
Wide Power and Little Scrutiny
By Leslie Eaton
The New York Times
May 23, 2004
When warring parents
head to court to fight over child custody in New York, their
lawyers often let them in on a little secret: The most powerful
person in the process is not the judge. It is not the other
parent, not one of the lawyers, not even a child.
No, the most important
person in determining who gets custody, and on what terms, is
frequently a court-appointed forensic evaluator. Forensics, as
they are often called, can be psychiatrists, psychologists or
social workers; they interview the families and usually make
detailed recommendations to judges, right down to who gets the
children on Wednesdays and alternate weekends.
And the judges usually
go along.
Forensic reports, which
the parents pay for, can cost as much as $40,000 or even more.
There are no standards for who can be an evaluator or what
should go into an assessment. The court system does not track
who gets these lucrative appointments, much less whether
evaluators tend to favor fathers or mothers or joint custody.
Some lawyers and
parents suspect that cronyism plays a big role in some
appointments, but given the secrecy surrounding matrimonial
cases, that is hard to prove, or disprove. Others say there is
nowhere to lodge complaints about mistreatment. And many
including some forensics question whether there is any
scientific basis to justify the evaluators' recommendations.
In Suffolk County,
judges repeatedly appointed a psychologist who was not licensed
to practice in New York State. In Manhattan, an evaluator
remained on a case even though there was evidence that he had
had business dealings with one spouse's lawyer. In Westchester
County, an expert charged parents $57,000 for a report that the
judge found extremely biased toward the father.
Though they have been
around for years, court-appointed forensics have become
increasingly commonplace and controversial in New York,
which may be the high-conflict custody capital of the nation.
But similar debates about custody evaluators are going on across
the country, experts say, as divorce rates continue to rise and
courts try to cope with the needs of children caught up in a
contentious process.
"It's boiling over
everywhere," said Peter Salem, executive director of the
Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, based in Madison,
Wis.
In Arizona, the
governor recently signed a law changing the state's process for
investigating complaints about psychologists, in part because of
controversy over forensic evaluations. In Louisiana, a committee
of the state board governing social workers is considering
creating standards for evaluations.
And over the last few
years, California has adopted a series of court rules that
require training for forensics, set standards for evaluations
and provide mechanisms for filing grievances against evaluators,
said Philip M. Stahl, a psychologist and frequent lecturer on
custody evaluations. "It's the only state where the rules are
very specific," he said.
In New York, forensics'
roles are being debated at judicial conferences, psychiatric
conventions and impromptu meetings of disgruntled parents. Even
the court system has decided to take another look at them,
through a commission appointed in February by the state's chief
judge.
Forensics "have really
become arbiters of what happens in a case," Raoul L. Felder, the
divorce lawyer, said disapprovingly. "I just think somehow
they've seeped into the judicial process."
Some people think that
is as it should be. "With some exceptions, I didn't try a
contested custody case without a forensic assessment," said
Philip C. Segal, a former Family Court judge now in private
practice. "They were extremely helpful, even critical."
Custody cases are
difficult and emotionally fraught, he said, adding that judges
need help "analyzing the family dynamics, analyzing the parents'
respective abilities." Judges must decide custody cases based on
the best interest of the child in question, and they can appoint
a "neutral expert" whenever they think it would be helpful in
making that decision.
Some judges ask the
parties' lawyers to agree on a forensic or to provide a list of
candidates; others simply name an evaluator. Some judges have
very specific questions they want addressed; others just call
for an evaluation. Many, though not all, want detailed
recommendations.
The American
Psychological Association's guidelines state that while
evaluators may determine whether either parent has severe
psychological problems, that is not their main goal. Rather,
evaluators are supposed to judge the parties' "parenting
capacity" and how that fits the psychological needs of the
child.
Forensics themselves do
not agree on how to conduct a proper examination. Some order
psychological tests, while others avoid them; some interview
baby sitters and teachers, while others do not.
In the end, the
evaluator gives the court a report that usually makes detailed
recommendations about custody arrangements. The parents are not
generally given copies; in some cases, they are not even allowed
to read the reports.
At that point, the
parents usually settle, "which we would much prefer, for the
parties' sake," said Justice Jacqueline W. Silbermann, the
administrative judge for matrimonial matters in New York State.
The reports' usefulness in encouraging settlements is one reason
judges order them, she said.
But what pleases the
judges sticks in the craw of some litigants, who say they feel
bludgeoned into settling by a report that does not favor them,
even when they believe that the report is deeply flawed. Some
lawyers contend that the evaluations actually discourage
settlements in certain cases because the favored party feels no
need to compromise.
The only way to
challenge a forensic report is to go through a full trial and
then cross-examine the evaluator; parties can also hire their
own experts to critique the court-appointed forensic, but
generally cannot have the family evaluated by someone else.
In the meantime, judges
are reading evaluators' reports and making decisions based on
them, with no way to know whether the observations and
conclusions are correct, said William S. Beslow, a prominent
matrimonial lawyer in Manhattan.
"In eight years, I have
not participated in a case with a forensic report that was not
substantially erroneous in one of its major conclusions," Mr.
Beslow said. "And some are so wrong that they have disastrous
consequences for families."
Underlying all the
concerns about forensic evaluators is the question of whether
they are offering the court scientific expertise or
unsubstantiated opinions.
Jeffrey P. Wittmann, a
forensic who has done hundreds of evaluations, says that his
colleagues have been giving the courts both, and that they
should stick to the scientific evidence. Dr. Wittmann,
co-director of the Center for Forensic Psychology in Albany,
said he stopped making specific recommendations to judges six
years ago, and has urged colleagues to do the same.
The reason, he said, is
that forensics do not really know, with any degree of certainty,
what is in a child's best interest. Little scientific research
on the subject exists.
Forensics do provide
courts with useful information, he said, but drawing conclusions
about the child's best interest and making recommendations on
custody and on visiting is inappropriate, even unethical. "We
have become like mini-judges," he added, "and it's a big
mistake."
Among psychiatrists and
psychologists, Dr. Wittmann's argument is far from the most
extreme. William O'Donohue, a psychology professor at the
University of Nevada, Reno, is calling for a moratorium on
forensic evaluations until more research is done.
"Psychologists don't
have the knowledge to do what they attempt to do when they do
custody evaluations," he said.
Many custody decisions,
he said, involve not scientific findings, but competing values,
like a father's wish that his child excel in sports versus the
mother's emphasis on studying.
While mental health
experts have been debating these issues for several years, the
legal world has been slower to recognize them, at least in New
York.
Enter Timothy M.
Tippins, an Albany lawyer who increasingly specializes in
cross-examining forensic experts. For almost a year, Mr. Tippins
has been writing articles in The New York Law Journal
questioning the role and expertise of forensic evaluators in
custody cases. He has teamed up with Dr. Wittmann to write a
paper titled "Empirical and Ethical Problems With Custody
Recommendations: A Call for Clinical Humility and Judicial
Vigilance."
Among its
recommendations is a call for judges to "begin to help the
psychology discipline rein in itself" by not demanding or
accepting specific custody plans.
In March and April, the
two presented their arguments to conferences of New York State
judges; later this year, they will speak to judges at the
state's appellate level.
Some judges have
welcomed his arguments, Mr. Tippins said. "I think they had on
their antennae that something was amiss with these reports."
In part as a response
to Mr. Tippins, Dr. Alex Weintrob organized a symposium on the
scientific basis of expert testimony in matrimonial disputes at
the American Psychiatric Association's annual meeting this month
in Manhattan.
Dr. Weintrob, a
well-known child psychiatrist who does evaluations, said later
that "there is more science than some people give us credit
for." On the other hand, he added, "it is important that we be
aware of our limitations," citing as an example the lack of
follow-up studies to see if forensics' predictions worked out.
"We all know it and are a little embarrassed by it."
Even proponents of
forensic evaluations are troubled by the secrecy that envelops
the business, and the large sums of money that change hands, by
order of the court.
"It's an industry, and
it's unregulated, and it affects precious family rights," said
Andrew I. Schepard, director of the Center for Children,
Families and the Law at Hofstra University. "It would be lots
better if this process were more transparent."
The secrecy alone
raises questions in the minds of some parents. One woman, a
Manhattan financial analyst who spoke on the condition that her
name not be used because her court case is continuing, said she
had heard from other parents that the evaluator in her case had
a history of recommending that custody go to fathers. But, she
complained, there is no way to know for sure.
In Kaye v. Kaye, an
extremely bitter divorce case in Manhattan, the mother
discovered that her court-appointed forensic had participated in
a business venture with four other people involved in her case,
including her ex-husband's lawyer.
This gave her grave
doubts about how neutral he truly was, she said, speaking on the
condition that her first name not appear in print. Judges are
required to disclose their ties, she said, "and the same should
be true of neutral officers of the court."
Justice Judith J.
Gische denied the woman's request for a mistrial, ruling that
the business a limited partnership with a divorce-related Web
site called SoftSplit.com, now defunct was a for-profit
educational venture, and that the lawyers, forensics and others
involved were not "in business" together. An appeal of that
decision is pending.
But the
conflict-of-interest allegations about SoftSplit, which were
reported by The New York Post last year, are still stirring up
such hard feelings among lawyers and forensics that Donald
Frank, the lawyer for the mother, refused to discuss the case.
Few parents are willing
to talk publicly about their experiences for fear of seeing
painful family matters aired in the press, or of being dragged
by into court by the other parent. They also say they are often
dismissed as disgruntled litigants who are angry that the
evaluator did not favor them (which, of course, they often are).
The American
Psychological Association's ethics committee reports that a
rising percentage of the complaints it receives involve forensic
evaluations. And Dr. Spencer Eth, a member of the ethics
committee of the American Psychiatric Association, said local
branches of his group also investigate many complaints about
forensic evaluations. While such complaints seldom result in a
psychiatrist's being suspended or removed from the association,
he said, doctors are sometimes reprimanded or educated about the
proper way to conduct evaluations.
The association takes
on this role in part, he said, because state licensing boards
tend to be ill-equipped to deal with problems that crop up in
psychiatric practices, including some that are almost etiquette
issues: a doctor's rudeness, for example, or his failure to
return telephone calls.
New York's court system
does not have a formal mechanism for receiving complaints about
forensics, and because they are officers of the court, they
cannot be sued for malpractice.
The rules governing
matrimonial matters are being re-examined by a commission
appointed by the state's chief judge, Judith S. Kaye.
The commission will
examine the role and use of forensic examiners, said Justice
Sondra Miller, the appellate division judge who is leading the
group. After holding public hearings, she said, it will make
recommendations to Judge Kaye, probably in about a year.
In the meantime,
however, some lawyers say they believe that judges are becoming
more skeptical about forensic reports, and may use them a little
less. One such lawyer is Norman M. Sheresky, who represented a
mother who prevailed in a Manhattan court despite an evaluator's
recommendation in favor of the father. The judge tossed out the
report's findings as biased, he said.
"I think that will
happen more and more," Mr. Sheresky said. "I think the judges
are getting wise."
TUG-OF-LOVE TEMPEST
By Brad Hamilton
New York Post
May 18, 2003
A group of highly paid experts,
whose testimony has helped decide hundreds of child-custody cases in
the city, is under investigation over whether they disclosed to the
court and clients that they had gone into business together, The
Post has learned.
Sherrill Spatz, the matrimonial
court's inspector general for fiduciary appointments, is looking
into whether any conflict-of-interest rules were broken when 37
supposedly independent shrinks and child guardians became affiliated
through an Internet venture, yet were sometimes on opposing sides of
custody wrangles.
The experts under examination
include some that made big bucks in custody battles involving former
Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Revlon CEO Ron Perelman and publishing queen
Judith Regan.
The experts were recruited by a
company called Soft Split LLC and were promoted on a Web site that
offered tips on how to negotiate divorce and custody fights. Some
experts also participated in online chat rooms accessed through the
site.
That business link was never
revealed in court when some of the experts were assigned by judges
to at least eight known cases, according to a group of parents who
pushed for the probe.
Members of the parents group suspect
many more cases were affected.
One member of the group, who asked
not to be named, was shocked to discover that her ex-husband's
lawyer was part of Soft Split - along with all four experts assigned
by the court to her case.
The woman's lawyer demanded a
conflict-of-interest hearing in February, during which three Soft
Split experts admitted that they had hoped to make money from their
affiliation with the Web company.
Manhattan matrimonial Judge Judith
Gische denied the conflict-of-interest motion after three Soft Split
members testified they had not, at that point, profited from the
venture.
But after that hearing, the
company's Web site, www.softsplit.com, was closed down.
Prior to then, experts listed on the
Web site as Soft Split "team members" included some of the biggest
names in the divorce business - law guardian Jo Ann Douglas,
psychiatrist Stephen Herman and psychologist April Kuchuk, all of
whom can get six-figure paychecks from their court appointments.
Soft Split was launched in 2000 with
half a million dollars in investments from various individuals,
according to the company's former lawyer Peter Corrigan.
Former real-estate developer Richard
Pink, the brains behind Soft Split, could not be contacted for
comment. Attempts to contact other Soft Split officials also were
unsuccessful.
The company is still an active
corporation according to the state Department of State.
Financial agreements between Soft
Split and its experts have not been released, but some Soft Split
"team members" interviewed by The Post said they believed that they
would eventually make money once the company took off.
But the company floundered when the
dot-com bubble burst, and it seems Soft Split is not widely known in
the legal world.
In an interview with The Post last
week, Justice Jacqueline Silbermann, the administrative judge for
the state's matrimonial courts, said she had never heard of Soft
Split even though she officiated at the marriage of high-profile
lawyer Robert Dobrisch, who was listed as a Soft Split "team
member."
After the Gische ruling in February,
members of the parents group decided to take their beef to Spatz.
Spatz wouldn't comment, but sources
familiar with the complaint said her office was hoping more parents
would come forward to help with the probe, which began 10 days ago.
The parents group has launched a Web
site, www.familyjustice.com
to find other cases.
"The fact that these people are in
business together just isn't right," said Beth Cockrell, a financial
consultant and member of the parents group.
INSIDER 'CLUB' GETS DIBS ON SPLITSVILLE $POILS
New York Post
May 18, 2003
--
Critics of New York's scarred matrimonial
courts say the Soft Split probe will only scratch the surface of a
troubled system.
Fee gouging, shoddy work and an
insider's mentality have allowed a handful of lawyers and shrinks to
cash in on all the top cases, they say.
"It's a little club, and these guys
wouldn't consider [Soft Split] a conflict [of interest] because
they're all in business together anyway," said civil-rights lawyer
Richard Emery, whose bitter divorce from actress Lori Singer cost
him hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Several lawyers of matrimonial and
custody fights said judges award huge fees to a select number of
experts - often without questioning their bills.
"You see the same names over and
over," said Howard Benjamin, an expert on legal ethics who has
testified that Soft Split members violated conflict-of-interest
rules by not revealing that they had formed an online company to
market their expertise.
Once an expert is assigned to a
case, dueling parents are forced to pay his or her fees.
Psychiatrists can charge $5,000 a
day. Guardians can get $300 an hour.
"It's all just ca-ching, ca-ching,"
said Judith Regan, who spent $100,000 on experts in her divorce and
custody fight with ex-husband Robert Kleinschmidt.
But child-custody experts say their
work and testimony is vital in allowing judges to decide kids'
futures.
[Index
to Articles]
|