|

Chief
Judge Kaye Reconfirmed
Over Some Republican Opposition
By Mark Johnson
The Associated Press
March 6, 2007
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Several
Republican senators on Tuesday declined to approve Chief Judge
Judith Kaye's nomination to continue as the state's top judge citing
concerns over rulings about school funding and the death penalty.
Still, Kaye was
overwhelmingly approved by the Republican-led state Senate in a
voice vote. Kaye can serve until the end of 2008, the year in which
she turns 70.
"Judge Kaye has presided
over the court with dignity, grace, integrity, passion and
intelligence for 14 years," said state Sen. John Bonacic.
"Interpreting the statutes made by any legislature can certainly be
a challenge. ... Judge Kaye has done this with skill and savvy,
recognizing the constitutional principles our founders laid and
applied them to our laws today."
Sens George Maziarz of
Niagara County and Stephen Saland of Poughkeepsie voiced opposition
to Kaye during debate on her nomination in the full Senate and voted
no on her nomination. Sen. Andrew Lanza of Staten Island earlier in
the day also voted no in committee on moving Kaye's nomination to
the floor for a vote.
The "no" votes were
rare for a body that often approves the governor's judicial nominees
unanimously.
Kaye was appointed chief
judge by Gov. Mario Cuomo in 1993. She was the state's first female
chief and the first woman to serve on the Court of Appeals. Cuomo
first appointed her as an associate judge of the court in September
1983. She is the longest serving chief judge in state history,
outlasting Chief Judge Sanford Church, who served from 1870 to 1880.
Maziarz said the Court of
Appeals decision vacating the death sentence of James Cahill in 2003
as reason to oppose Kaye. The ruling was one of several by the court
that left the state's death penalty statute in limbo.
Cahill, who was convicted
of first-degree murder in 1998 for poisoning his wife Jill to death
with potassium cyanide. She was in a hospital at the time,
recuperating from a severe beating Cahill inflicted on her six
months earlier with a baseball bat at their home near Syracuse.
"She has no compassion for
crime victims in New York state," Maziarz said. "Her decision in
overturning the death penalty, particularly in the case of Jill
Cahill, was just her putting her personal opinion before what the
law was and what the governor signed."
Saland said he found Kaye's
opinions in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity case "troubling." In
2003, Kaye wrote the majority opinion in the landmark case that
found the state's education funding system was unconstitutional
because it did not provide New York City schoolchildren with a
"sound, basic education." The court ordered the state to spend
billions of dollars more on education.
Many Republicans, including
former Gov. George Pataki, argued funding decisions are only to be
made by the executive and legislative branches of government, not
the judiciary.
"She is an extremely decent
person with an exemplary sense of social consciousness, but I like
judges to try to stick to the law and exercise judicial restraint,"
Saland told The Associated Press. "If I was looking for a 213th
legislator, I would seek to amend the constitution."
Kaye said after her
confirmation hearing Tuesday morning that she and her fellow judges
always take the Legislature's wishes into account when making
decisions.
"We are very mindful of the
roles of the different branches of government," Kaye said. "I can't
tell you the number of times ... we talk about the intent of the
legislature when a statute is an issue. That rises to the top of our
list. We are very mindful of our role and the role of the
Legislature."
Split
Associated Press
New York Post
March 7, 2007
-- ALBANY - Several
Republican state senators declined to OK Chief Judge Judith Kaye's
nomination to remain the state's top judge, citing concerns on
school-funding and death-penalty rulings.
Still, she was
overwhelmingly approved by the GOP-led body.
The "no" votes were rare as
the Senate often approves the governor's judicial nominees
unanimously. Kaye, the first female chief, was appointed by Gov.
Mario Cuomo in 1993.
Kaye Becomes First 2-term Top Judge
By Yancey Roy
Albany Bureau
The Ithaca Journal.com
March 7, 2007
ALBANY — The state Senate
Tuesday confirmed Judith Kaye for another term as New York's chief
judge, making her the only jurist ever reappointed to the post.
Technically, Kaye's
appointment is for 14 years. But she will be able to serve just 21
months. Kaye will turn 70 years old, the mandatory retirement age
for judges, in 2008 and must step down on Dec. 31 of that year.
Kaye has been on the state
Court of Appeals since 1983 and the chief judge since 1993. By the
time she steps down, the Democrat will have logged more than 25
years, giving her the second-longest tenure on the state's top
court, according to court officials, bested only by Stanley H. Fuld
who served from 1946 to 1973 and Charles Desmond, 1940-1966.
Kaye years ago became the
longest-tenured chief judge, surpassing Sanford Church who held the
post for just over 10 years ending in 1880. Court of Appeals slots
were filled by a combination of elections and appointments until the
1970s, when the state switched to 14-year appointments exclusively.
(The modern era of the court is considered to have begun in 1847.)
Though considered one of
the more liberal members of the seven-member court, Kaye has not
pushed the court toward the left during her tenure, analysts say. In
fact, the court has been known for its moderation and its tendency
to not overreach in handing down decisions.
At her confirmation
hearing, senators praised Kaye's "dignity" and "thoughtfulness" and
her administrative efforts to change jury selection and specialize
venues dealing with drug crimes and family/domestic-violence issues.
But they also grilled her about some of the key cases of her tenure,
including the death penalty and the landmark school funding case.
Perhaps the testiest
exchange focused on the latter, when Senate Education Committee
Chairman Stephen Saland, R-Poughkeepsie, essentially accused the
court of overstepping its powers. The court ruled in 2003 that the
state had shortchanged New York City schools and ordered the state
to pump billions of dollars into the system.
"I'm very troubled when I
view the court, your court or any other court, usurping the
legislative function even if for perfectly desirable social ends,"
Saland said. "I don't think the ends justifies the means ... and I
would appeal for some sort of judicial restraint."
"I would agree with you,"
Kaye quickly shot back. "It would be terrible if we usurped the
legislative function based on preconceived philosophy or political
end. I cannot agree that the court does that or that I do that."
Saland voted against Kaye's
appointment. He said it was "not merely a matter of competence" or
qualifications but a feeling that Kaye at times "ruled more like a
legislator" than a judge.
Sen. George Maziarz,
R-Newfane, Niagara County, the only other senator to vote against
her, cited the court's 2004 ruling effectively declaring the state's
death-penalty law unconstitutional.
Senate Judiciary Chairman
John DeFrancisco, R-Syracuse, also raised questions about Kaye's
proposal to establish regional panels to screen the credentials of
candidates for local judicial elections. The state is under a
federal court order (now on appeal) to change its method for
electing state Supreme Court judges.
"It goes back to the fact
that judicial elections are different. There's no question they are
different," Kaye began. "The idea that judicial candidates would go
out to the public to raise millions of dollars, to engage in
unbridled political rhetoric — to me, that's just unthinkable."
She said the proposal would
not block anyone from getting on the ballot but would give the
public some evaluations of a candidate's qualifications. But
DeFrancisco, who eventually supported Kaye, didn't sound satisfied.
"This goes to concerns
raised by Senator Saland: separation of powers," DeFrancisco said.
"Whose role is it, really, to set the parameters of elections? I
could not find, really, any (authority) for the judicial branch to
be involved."
"We are not setting up
parameters of elections," Kaye said, adding that court
administrative law gave her the power to set up the panels. No one
would be compelled appear before them.
In the end, even those who
have criticized some of the court's decisions praised Kaye's tenure.
"I don't think any chief
judge has presided over the court with as much dignity and
straightforwardness as you have," said Sen. Dale Volker, R-Depew,
Erie County, who has served in the Legislature since 1973. "You will
be remembered possibly as the finest legal mind Court of Appeals
chief judge in modern times."
Kaye's husband, attorney
Stephen Rackow Kaye, died in October. That led some to wonder
whether she'd retire rather than seek reappointment. But she told
senators she wanted to stay on, in part, to push for her three top
"reforms:" boosting judicial pay, restructuring the multi-layered
court system and upgrading town and village courts.
[Index
to Articles]
|