|

Help, but
the Price Is Steep
Advances on Personal-injury Plaintiffs
and Lawyers with Promising Cases
By Scott Barancik
St. Petersburg Times
Litigation Nation
September 1, 2007
Poor Joe Shmoe.
Ever since a car slammed
into his bicycle, he's been unable to work, gotten behind on his
mortgage and run up huge medical bills. Settlement talks have gone
nowhere, and the driver's insurer knows he's in no position to
negotiate. If only someone would give him a loan.
Would you take that bet?
Banks won't, but for the right price, companies like Miami-based
Fast Funds Inc. or Injury Funds Now of Miami Beach just might. In
exchange for high-interest fees or a large chunk of any settlement,
these firms wager cash advances on personal-injury plaintiffs and
lawyers with promising cases. If a client loses, he repays nothing.
Ever so quietly, financial
services companies have become a force in America's courtrooms.
Largely unregulated, they fund lawsuits, use annuities to spread
settlement payouts over many years, offer advances on settled cases,
and buy settlements for cash. The ideas aren't necessarily new. In
1962, for example, the Florida Bar ruled that it would be a conflict
of interest for trial lawyers to bankroll needy clients via a
not-for-profit loan program.
Do such companies do more
good than harm? The jury is still out. Rapid Funds, the trade name
for White Plains, N.Y.-based Cybersettle Financial Services LLC,
serves a tiny niche: victorious plaintiffs who can't survive the
time it takes a defendant to pay. The company says it can cut a
check within 24 hours, minus a 6 to 8 percent commission. If the
defendant fails to pay, Rapid Funds takes the loss, president Peter
Speziale says.
Companies that buy
multi-year settlements for cash do a brisk business. Say our
imaginary friend Joe Shmoe settles with his opponent's insurance
company for $1-million, spread out over 20 years so that he always
has enough cash for a home nurse. Five years later, however, doctors
discover his young son has a serious illness and treating it won't
be cheap. Joe's only option may be to sell the annuity at a deep
discount.
Settlement purchasers
haven't enjoyed a sterling reputation. "In the mid-1990s, when this
practice started, there were a lot of very shady dealings," says
Randy Dyer, executive vice president of the National Structured
Settlements Trade Association. "People were sort of left to be
victimized." Since then, industry leaders like J.G. Wentworth of
Bryn Mawr, Pa., have made voluntary reforms, and the industry
consented to judicial review. Today, all proposed transfers in
Florida must be approved by a judge.
Still, the industry is
loath to call its products "loans." Doing so would invite
regulation.
So should people seek out
lawsuit funding? No doubt, they're in a bind: injured and needy
plaintiffs whose "lawsuit is their only asset," as Hillsborough
County Circuit Court Judge James Barton puts it. To them, such
funding "can be attractive, and in some cases even irresistible."
Still, St. Petersburg
lawyer Kent Whittemore won't recommend lawsuit funding to his
clients. "The interest rates are extremely high, they continue to
accrue, and in many cases it gets to the point where there's not
enough money to pay back the loans," he says.
[Index
to Articles]
|