Attorney Group Would Mete Out Justice With Love

By Thomas Adcock
New York Lawyer
New York Law Journal
January 5, 2007

Love, according to a loose confederation of attorneys around the country who would alter the U.S. legal system beyond all recognition, is the answer.

These attorneys are members—though a formal membership list does not exist—of the Project for Integrating Spirituality, Law and Politics, established in 2001 by Peter Gabel, a former professor at City University of New York School of Law.

Short of radically remaking the legal landscape, project adherents patiently prescribe meditation as good medicine in the meantime for what ails the profession at the personal level, certainly among the junior ranks.

"The inability to make a contribution to social good is the aspect of practice that seems to disappoint young lawyers the most," according to a survey report in 2000 by the American Bar Association. The report found that only 27 percent of lawyers polled said they were "very satisfied" with their profession, with the remainder about evenly divided between "somewhat satisfied" and "very dissatisfied."

The root cause of such inchoate unhappiness, according to Mr. Gabel, is the adversarial nature of the U.S. legal system, which he contends ignores the philosophy of the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.

"Justice is really love in calculation," said Mr. King at the first mass meeting of political activists in Montgomery, Ala., in 1955 to launch a year-long boycott of the city’s racially segregated bus system. "Justice is love correcting that which revolts against love."

Mr. Gabel, currently a law professor and president of New College of California in San Francisco, composed something of a bible for the project. In the December 2000 edition of Tikkun magazine, he expanded on the King philosophy:

[L]egal culture ought to be a spiritual practice through which the community calls upon love’s evolving wisdom to heal the spiritual distortions that continue to alienate us from love itself as the realization of our social being.

America’s legal culture at the turn of the millennium has temporarily lost this connection to justice because its great historical accomplishment—the affirmation of the freedom of the individual and the protection of the individual from officially sanctioned group coercion—has been misunderstood to require the denial of the spiritual...[W]e have created a society of disconnected monads, spiritually isolated and starved for love and recognition.

[T]he law is not exclusively to blame for this, but it does have a special responsibility because it legitimizes our predicament in the name of justice.

Adherents of the project’s lofty rhetoric and aims will next gather on April 22-23 at Touro Law Center in Central Islip for a conference titled "Law as a Healing Profession," hosted by Touro Law Professor Marjorie A. Silver. Past gatherings have seen attendance of about 70 lawyers, heavy on academicians and public service practitioners.

Lawyers, Fun & Money

By Saira Rao
New York Post
December 31, 2006

Slideshow image- The city's largest, most prestigious law firms are suffering from serious brain drain.

Young, Gen-X lawyers in their third to fifth year in the business are walking away from their $200,000-a-year positions in record numbers - at times without another job in view.

The reason? They are unhappy with their Major law firms face brain drain from Gen-Xers like Blackberry lifestyle - being tethered to the job Taggart Grant, who are walking away    24/7 and having to rush back to the office at a from the long-accepted grind of the        moment's notice when e-mail orders pop up on corporate ladder. Grant collected his     the ubiquitous PDA.
bonus then headed west.

The exodus of law firm associates is unprecedented, according to the National Association of Law Placement, or NALP, which found that 37 percent of associates leave large firms within the first three years.

A whopping 77 percent of associates leave within five years, according to NALP's latest survey.

That is up sharply from recent years, and the resulting brain drain is wrecking havoc on law firms.

"There's a significant drain on your potential as a firm if you can't mitigate it," Mike, a partner at a 400-plus lawyer Big Apple firm, said of the young legal eagle exodus.

Mike, like many lawyers interviewed for this story, spoke only if neither they or their firm were identified, fearing client losses.

While increased attrition is a typical effect of a relatively healthy economy, Mike claimed, "It'd be a mistake to say it's all driven by the economics."

The big-firm brain drain is also giving partners a major case of agita - forcing them to do the yeoman grunt work usually assigned to associates. In addition, the firms are being forced to scramble to fill the mid-level talent void. Some are even doing the previously unheard of - hiring from second-tier law schools.

John, a fifth year associate at a prominent Wall Street firm, is, like many young lawyers, walking out the door. He is leaving for a coveted in-house position at an investment bank. "I'm just waiting for my bonus," the 31-year-old says.

In fact, the next major wave of legal brain drain will occur over the next few weeks as young lawyers jump ship after collecting their bonus checks.

"It's the mid-levels, the third through fifth years that are leaving, so you're losing people you've spent lots of money on training, and just as they start to run things, they leave, and firms become less profitable," Mike, the partner, adds.

John, the associate ready to leave, notices the effect of the mid-level brain drain at his own firm. Gone, he said, is the traditional pyramid of power, from the numerous first-year associates up to select first-year partners.

"It's gone from a pyramid to a strange hourglass shape," John says. "It's bizarre. Now you'll see deal teams with a partner and a first-year associate, with nobody in the middle."

"You should see the partners," John says. "They're doing the work of mid-levels to pick up the slack. And even though they make over $1 million, they never see their family. There's little reward in that for me."

Tagg Grant, 31, couldn't agree more. The self-described "recovering lawyer" removed himself from firm life last year, as a third-year corporate associate. "I didn't want to sleep on my office floor anymore or wonder if I had a change of underwear somewhere in my file cabinet."

That these Gen-Xers are choosing quality of life over a paycheck doesn't surprise Janelle Wilson, a sociology professor at the University of Minnesota.

"Generation Xers don't measure success or happiness by traditional measures, namely occupational prestige, power and income," she notes. Eva Wisnik, a time-management expert, has been hired by some firms to help associates deal with the lack of free time.

For example, if the partner you are working for doesn't get in until 10, "then go to the gym first thing in the morning," she advises.

SAIRA RAO, a lawyer and writer, recently left a large city law firm. Her debut novel, "Chambermaid," will be published by Grove Press in July.

[Index to Articles]

 

A Feast

Take Action

Judicial Accountability | Judicial Independence | Discipline State Court Judges
Appeals-State Court | Disposal of JQC & Other Records | Discipline Federal Court Judges | Appeals -Federal Court | Judicial Canons | Violation of Separation of Powers
History of the Bar | Privatization of the Bar | Unauthorized Appropriation of Funds
The Judicial Bar Rules | Unauthorized Bar Functions | Law is Big Business | Endnotes