Firm Leader Survey
Forecast: Mostly Sunny

Vivia Chen
Daily Business Review
December 28, 2006

Count on the leaders of America’s biggest law firms to lead the pep rally. The heads of Am Law 200 firms have been bullish about the year ahead since American Lawyer magazine began surveying them annually in 2003. This time, they are even more so: Ninety-one percent of respondents say they are optimistic about their firms’ future. It’s the first time more than 90 percent of those surveyed gave that response. Firm leaders also say they expect growth in most of the leading indicators firm revenues, profits per partner, billing rates and head
                                            count.

Enthusiasm about the economy as a whole was a little more muted. The largest group of respondents about 77 percent  predict that the U.S. economy will grow only slightly in 2007, and 71 percent say they expect deal flow to increase only moderately.

In fact, in interviews, firm leaders expressed an undercurrent of doubt about how long the good times will last. "I’m bullish, but I’m also worried," admitted one. Another said that the economy must be good because "most experts are positive," but he hedged his bets by adding that his firm is "also strong in restructuring, [so] we’ll be fine" in a recession. A third passed the buck: "I’ll let you call the guy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue."

The survey by American Lawyer magazine, an affiliate of the Daily Business Review, was conducted in October, asking the heads of Am Law 200 firms to complete a confidential online questionnaire. This year the magazine received 143 responses.

Some highlights from the

Survey:

• Sixty-six percent of respondents predicted that profits will grow by more than 5 percent; 31 percent said they will increase 5 percent or less; and the remaining 3 percent said they will be flat.

• Fifty-three percent said rates will rise by more than 5 percent; 46 percent said they will increase by 5 percent or less. Only 2 percent said they’ll keep rates steady.

• Litigation is expected to see the greatest revenue growth, according to 35 percent of the respondents. Corporate activity runs a close second 32 percent said that will be their area of greatest growth in 2007, followed by intellectual property, which was named by 20 percent.

• Mass tort and securities litigation will stay in the picture. Despite studies forecasting a decrease in these areas, 45 percent of respondents said that the practices have remained stable this past year, and 31 percent report an increase. Twenty-three percent report a decrease.

• Firm leaders are not fretting about associate retention. More than 67 percent said that associate retention is a minor problem or no problem at all.

• There is no collections slowdown. About 64 percent of respondents reported clients are paying their bills at the same pace as the year before. Twenty-two percent said clients are paying more promptly, and 15 percent said they are taking longer to pay.

• Respondents’ top disappointments include the failure to attract major lateral partners, a lack of collaboration among partners for cross-selling and business development, insufficient growth in revenue, and an inability to attract minority candidates.

Despite the mostly rosy outlook, firm leaders said that trying to figure out what clients want has become a major preoccupation. "The thing that haunts me the most is the future  what clients need, how we can anticipate those needs, how we get talent," said Hughes Hubbard & Reed chair Candace Beinecke.

Morgan Lewis & Bockius chairman Francis Milone said that "more and more clients are interviewing more firms. I worry all the time whether clients are satisfied."

Adding to the uncertainty is clients’ increasing use of requests for proposals, in which firms must bid for jobs, rather than rest on their laurels (or perhaps a preexisting relationship). "We do more RFPs these days  that’s the world we’re in," said Covington & Burling managing partner Stuart Stock. Another reason for worry: convergence  the increasingly popular practice among clients of building short lists of approved outside counsel by winnowing down the number of outside firms they use.

In such an atmosphere, some firms are being proactive about client retention. Milone said Morgan Lewis now hires coaches to help lawyers "enhance their interpersonal skills." White & Case managing partner Duane Wall said his firm "ask[s] our clients all the time what they think of us. ... We run statistics; we have a client-calling program." Wall estimates that his partners and the firm’s marketing team will have visited 50-60 clients by the end of 2006. "I’ve done six or seven myself," he said.

However, that kind of approach is still the exception, not the rule. For all the griping about the competitive marketplace, most firms seem passive about client satisfaction. About 46 percent of respondents to the survey said they visited with five or fewer major clients in 2006; 8 percent didn’t meet with any. (In 2005’s survey, 48 percent of respondents said they visited with five or fewer clients, and 6 percent met with none.)

Nearly all of the Am Law 200 leaders surveyed insisted that their firms are not threatened by the convergence movement. Marianne Short, managing partner-elect of Dorsey & Whitney, said that "convergence works for us, [because] we have very close relationships with our clients," who include Wal-Mart Stores; Supervalu and UnitedHealth Group.

"We welcome convergence," said Kaye Scholer’s Barry Willner, citing demand for the firm’s intellectual property, product liability, antitrust, commercial litigation and private equity practices. Willner said his 500-lawyer firm has nothing to fear from thousand-lawyer-plus shops: "We don’t see clients going to megafirms," he said. "They are not going to firms based on size."

Despite the view that convergence is the other guy’s problem, some Am Law 200 firms are trying new strategies to stay competitive. One method is to scrap the hourly fee structure. "Clients are looking for discounts and want a little skin here and there," Short said. "Flexibility is key."

White & Case’s Wall said his firm is more willing than some of its clients on this issue: "Clients still believe in the hourly rate; they feel [it gives them] more control." Rather than agreeing to a fixed fee  which Wall argues is more efficient and cost-effective for all concerned  clients prefer getting a discount on the hourly billings, he said. So for now, Wall said, discounts are "very common" from all firms.

Some firms peg their fees to the outcome of a litigation or transaction. "There’s more risk-sharing between a law firm and the client," said Matthew Larrabee, the managing partner of Heller Ehrman. "Most Am Law 100 firms outside of Wall Street will do this kind of partnership-building with clients. This can be a huge advantage over the Wall Street firms."

Although firms may say they are on the cutting edge when it comes to fee arrangements, they’re conservative about the bottom line. About 89 percent of respondents said that their firms will carry the same or less debt as the year before; only 11 percent plan on borrowing more.

Firms are also cautious about overseas expansion. Less than one-quarter of respondents  22 percent  said their firms are considering opening new offices abroad. Heads of such global firms as White & Case (36 offices) and Hogan & Hartson (23 offices) said they’re maxed out on the international front.

Hogan’s managing partner, J. Warren Gorrell Jr., answered a definitive "no" to the question of new offices, and wouldn’t say whether the firm will close existing offices, although he acknowledged that "Central Europe has been challenging for us."

White & Case’s Wall said, "We finished our geographic build-out." The firm closed offices in San Francisco and Ho Chi Minh City in 2006.

But one firm that’s seriously looking into opening an office abroad is Houston’s Bracewell & Giuliani, which competes against oil and energy firms that already have a substantial overseas presence. "There is so much capital" in the Persian Gulf, said managing partner Patrick Oxford. "We are very optimistic [about business there]." Despite what Oxford sees as exceptional opportunities in that region, he’s not rushing in. "It’s difficult to read about the strife [in the Middle East] and not be cautious about putting people there," he said. "I’d be lying if I said we didn’t look at world events."

So does Hughes Hubbard’s Beinecke. "I wonder about our economy, and where the world is going," she said. "But maybe that’s just me."

Or maybe not.

Vivia Chen writes for American Lawyer magazine, an ALM Media affiliate of the Daily Business Review.

[Index to Articles]

 

A Feast

Take Action

Judicial Accountability | Judicial Independence | Discipline State Court Judges
Appeals-State Court | Disposal of JQC & Other Records | Discipline Federal Court Judges | Appeals -Federal Court | Judicial Canons | Violation of Separation of Powers
History of the Bar | Privatization of the Bar | Unauthorized Appropriation of Funds
The Judicial Bar Rules | Unauthorized Bar Functions | Law is Big Business | Endnotes