Probe
Details Lawyer's Conduct
Misuse of Funds Appears Wider Than First
Tought
By
Jasmine Kripalani
Miami Herald
May 26, 2003l
More
details have emerged from the Florida Bar's
investigation of prominent Broward attorney Edd
Kreiling, suspended over allegations that he
misused client funds -- in some cases for
personal use.
Harry
Rosen, managing partner of Rosen, Kreiling and
Eichner, a Weston law firm, said Sunday he
suspects Kreiling mishandled much more than
what's in the Bar's complaint.
''I
suspect it's more because I see money in one
account that doesn't belong there, and I can't
tell if there's money missing,'' said Rosen,
former mayor of Weston and Miramar.
Details
emerging from the Bar's investigation paint a
picture of a lawyer who shuffled clients' money
from one account to another, and hid files to
prevent getting caught.
Rosen
said his firm cannot account for $150,000,
missing from the estate of Carrie Kleiman of
Sunny Isles Beach, who died last August at age
91.
FIRED FROM FIRM
Kreiling, 57, was fired last month after Rosen
discovered discrepancies in trust fund accounts
handled by his partner. Rosen complained to the
Florida Bar, which investigated that and other
complaints. Kreiling was suspended last week.
Kreiling, a former city attorney for Miramar and
Golden Beach, declined to comment.
''It's
a shame that he's involved in this process,''
said his attorney, Kevin Tynan. ``We're going to
comply. I don't anticipate challenging the
suspension. Not at the moment.''
Kreiling has 60 days before the Florida Supreme
Court files for disbarment or gives him the
option to resign, according to Bar investigator
Joel Klaits. He could ask for a hearing to clear
his name.
In its
petition to the Supreme Court to suspend
Kreiling, the Bar alleged that Kreiling used
funds from the sale of Kleiman's home to repay
the firm for money he had taken from an escrow
account and used for personal expenses.
The
escrow money came from the sale of vacant land
owned by Simon and Douglas Development, a
Broward firm. Kreiling handled the escrow
account, which had a total of $86,000 from the
land sale.
According to the Bar complaint, Kreiling used
the escrow money to open an interest-bearing
trust account in the firm's name without Rosen's
knowledge, Rosen said.
Here's
an example of how he used some of Simon and
Douglas' escrow money, according to the Bar:
• He
made two wire transfers totaling about $18,923
to pay the mortgage on his Weston Hills home.
• He
used $3,500 to pay for his son's college tuition
in Australia.
• He
paid about $7,500 to Joseph Rosaler, his dentist
and personal friend.
• One
check was made out to Maurice Nanoia for
$17,900. Nanoia is his mother-in-law's
companion.
Kreiling told investigators it was to repay
Nanoia for his daughter's tuition at Lynn
University. Neither Nanoia nor Rosaler could be
reached for comment.
• He
paid his nephew Charles Burpee $6,000. Burpee
couldn't be reached for comment.
FEELING OF BETRAYAL
In a
voluntary statement to the Bar on April 23,
Kreiling told investigators that the money he
used to repay the firm came from his and his
mother Helen's personal accounts.
But the
Bar found that part of the money actually came
from the $150,000 Kleiman estate.
When
Rosen discovered the discrepancy in the Simon
and Douglas account, he fired Kreiling, who had
been with the firm for 27 years.
''I'm
sick about it. I feel betrayed,'' said Rosen,
who first hired Kreiling as the city attorney
for Miramar in 1975.
``People in my office are trying to get through
this, and we're doing everything we can to
straighten things out. But the money is the
smallest part. It's the personal betrayal.''
The
Kleiman money came from the sale of her home,
which was to be divided among her three
children, who live in Illinois. They could not
be reached for comment.
Kreiling misused at least $246,623 -- $300 to
$100,000 at a time -- from clients going back to
1999, Bar auditor William Luongo wrote in his
report.
In some
cases, Kreiling hid files and pulled checks from
the firm's bank statements to cover up the
transfers, the Bar found.
As a
partner in the Rosen, Kreiling and Eichner firm,
Kreiling had access to millions of dollars,
which belonged to about 100 clients, Rosen said.
He wrote and executed wills and handled trust
accounts for homeowners associations.
Rosen
said Kreiling never gave any indication that he
was having money problems. ''He knew that if he
needed money, all he had to do was come and ask
me,'' Rosen said.
`BREACH OF TRUST'
Clients
who trusted Kreiling say they feel betrayed.
When
Margaret Risley's brother, Conrad Eberhart, died
a childless bachelor without a will, she hired
Kreiling in April 2001 to establish herself as
Eberhart's only living heir. She stood to
inherit his Miami condo.
Kreiling sold the condo in July 27, 2001.
Risley
said she didn't receive any money from the sale
until February 2003.
''I'm
very upset because I hired him in good faith,''
she said. ``I made many phone calls to him that
were never returned.''
Risley,
who lives in Melbourne, is among the clients who
filed a complaint with the Florida Bar against
Kreiling. She said she still does not have the
paperwork from the condo sale.
''I
need the paperwork to settle the estate. I don't
know if he owes me more money. I have no
paperwork to show what has come in or out,'' she
said.
The
Florida Bar alleges in its petition that
Kreiling used money from the Eberhart estate to
pay his daughter's phone bill.
Joel
Fass, president of the Windmill Ranch Estates
homeowners association in Weston, has known
Kreiling for more than 20 years. Kreiling
represented the community in a sewer project
three years ago.
Kreiling handled an account set up to pay Bob
Gallagher, the engineer, as he finished each
project. The Bar found that Kreiling used $5,900
of his own money to pay Gallagher's $13,000
bill.
''I'm
shocked and disappointed,'' Fass said. ``I
considered him a friend. I think if these
allegations are true, there was a serious breach
of trust. He was well-respected and trusted by
lots of people. We're upset by the whole
thing.''