|

Treasury
Taps Two Law Firms
to Execute $700 Billion Bailout
By Karen Sloan
The National Law Journal
New York Lawyer
November 5, 2008
The U.S. Treasury
Department has tapped two law firms to help execute the $700 billion
bailout package that Congress passed in October.
Hughes Hubbard & Reed and
Squire Sanders & Dempsey were each awarded contracts worth up to
about $5.5 million to assist the U.S. Department of Treasury in the
execution of transactions under the new Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act, as the bailout package is formally known. The
plan allows the U.S. government to purchase distressed assets from
the nation's banks.
According to a press
release from the Treasury Department, the firms' duties include
"reviewing executed investment agreements, working directly with
accepted financial institutions to identify and resolve and legal
issues before closing, and conducting the closing of transactions."
The department said that
the law firms will work with about 2,000 financial firms as they
navigate the new government program.
Both New York-based Hughes
Hubbard and Squire Sanders declined to comment on the contracts.
The two law firm contracts
run through April 28, 2009.
The Treasury Department
said that it asked five law firms to bid on the bailout work, and
that four firms responded in late October. It did not disclose the
names of the firms that were asked to bid on the work.
New York-based Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett was awarded a $300,000 contract from the Treasury
Department in early October to consult on the bailout.
Eyeing
Big Bucks in New Regulations,
BigLaw Goes to Washington
By Gina Passarella
The Legal Intelligencer
New York Lawyer
October 29, 2008
PHILADELPHIA - With
increased regulation expected across several industries as a result
of the economic crisis and impending election, law firms with
Washington, D.C., offices will be at the heart of the activity and,
potentially, client coffers.
"The D.C. market is perhaps
the one that is going to benefit the most in the country from the
political and economic climate," according to Dan Binstock, managing
director of the Washington office of BCG Attorney Search.
Binstock said he hasn't yet
received an uptick in calls from firms looking to bulk up in the
nation's capital. They are instead creating practice groups around
the financial industry meltdown and formulating plans to deal with
the economic and political changes in store over the next few
months. But law firms are banking on increased regulatory changes,
and Binstock said he expects office growth to follow.
"Everyone is in a little
bit of a wait-and-see pattern to see what plays out with the
election," he said.
But regardless of who comes
into office in January, Binstock said firms are expecting regulatory
enforcement to pick up from what has been a more relaxed regulatory
environment under the current administration.
Some of the practices he
said could potentially see a boost include securities enforcement,
energy, export control and Food and Drug Administration issues.
Blank Rome has built its
Washington office to 100 attorneys and lobbyists between the law
firm side and the government relations component, with about 20 of
those 100 working for Blank Rome Government Relations.
In response to recent
events, the office puts out a daily update to its clients titled
"Financial Reform Watch," and the legal and lobbying entities have
jointly created a financial reform task force to help clients
navigate the changing financial markets. With the economy continuing
to fluctuate and elections just days away, the firm only sees that
role expanding into other regulatory-related practices.
"The center of activity is
moving in some significant part to Washington," the firm's
co-chairman, T. Michael Dyer, said.
Dyer merged his Washington
law firm Dyer Ellis & Joseph into Blank Rome in 2003, and the
government relations component began to grow shortly thereafter.
While there is no set number, Dyer said the more recent goal has
been to about double Blank Rome's presence in the city. Recent
developments, he said, lend greater urgency to that goal.
Firm managing partner Carl
M. Buchholz said there will be significant reform in a number of
areas regardless of who wins the election. He pointed to health care
as just one example of an industry that would see significant change
no matter who enters the White House.
Dyer said he expects much
greater regulatory enforcement coming from Washington, particularly
given that taxpayers have become large stakeholders in a wide range
of companies, which he said might expand to include auto
manufacturers before the turmoil is over.
This is a "new world," he
said, with increased regulation over the banking and insurance
industries, and that regulation might expand internationally.
European and Asian markets are seeking increased regulation over
global financial markets, Dyer said.
"All these changes will
require a lot of effort on the part of government relations
[professionals] and lawyers in Washington," he said.
Buchholz said the firm's
affiliation with Brussels-based public affairs firm Interel would
probably see an increased flow of work between the two firms because
of the international component to the financial crisis.
On the government relations
side, Dyer said he expects the group to grow because of an
anticipated increase in work. If the Democrats make big gains in
Congress and win the White House, regulatory activity will pick up
even more, he said.
But, on the whole, the
government relations group is fairly evenly split along party lines
and doesn't look to pick up people on one side or another because of
who wins an election, he said.
Edward J. Allera heads up
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney's FDA/biotechnology practice and
co-leads the firm's Washington office. Mergers and acquisitions
attorneys in other markets may have been busy for the last few
years, but Allera said the pendulum has swung back toward
administrative and regulatory practices.
"The one thing we know is
Congress is going to increase oversight and oversight is going to
increase agency activity," he said.
The firm's D.C. office has
lost a few government relations professionals this year, but Allera
said it has been adding to the group as well, most recently bringing
on Akerman Senterfitt government relations professional Alan Rubin.
There are now about 45 attorneys and another 15 attorneys and
professionals who work in the firm's government relations practice.
The changes in the economic
and political landscape are good things for Washington business,
Allera said. The firm has been busy in regulatory practices related
to the FDA, health care, banking and tax arenas and he said he only
sees that increasing in January.
For Reed Smith, the biggest
growth potential comes for its financial industry group, which makes
up about 30 percent of the firm's revenue, according to the firm's
director of legal personnel, Eugene Tillman.
The firm also has a strong
health care and government contracts presence in Washington. While
Tillman said he thinks the regulations over those industries
certainly aren't going anywhere, he said he doesn't think there will
be the dramatic sea change in regulation that will be seen in the
financial services market.
Tillman is based in
Washington along with more than 70 other Reed Smith attorneys. He
said the firm is well positioned to handle increased regulatory
needs, but would be open to adding high-level attorneys with
regulatory experience.
"This is a time we would be
particularly interested in that," Tillman said.
Drinker Biddle & Reath grew
its Washington office through a January 2007 merger with
Chicago-based Gardner Carton & Douglas. It now has slightly fewer
than 100 attorneys in the market.
Executive partner Andrew C.
Kassner said the firm's strategic plan called for growth in
Washington long before the current economic crisis.
Drinker Biddle has a strong
focus in the pharmaceutical and health care industries, two areas
that would tie into the regulatory changes in the capital. Kassner
said the firm would also look to grow in Washington its human
resources practice, which includes labor and employment and employee
benefits, along with its intellectual property, litigation and
investment management practices.
While many firms are
looking to grow in the Washington market, there are a few local
firms that don't have offices anywhere near Pennsylvania Avenue.
According to The Legal 's
publication PaLAW 2007 , seven of the largest 25 law firms in the
state don't have Washington offices. Wolf Block has a small
satellite office with two attorneys who spend part of their time
there.
Marshall Dennehey Warner
Coleman & Goggin, Fox Rothschild, White & Williams, Stevens & Lee,
Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, Montgomery McCracken Walker &
Rhoads and Cohen & Grigsby are some of the largest Pennsylvania
firms that have yet to create a presence in the district.
Morgan Lewis & Bockius has
the largest Washington presence of any Pennsylvania firm, ranking
fourth on the Legal Times ' recent rankings of the 50 largest branch
offices in the city. With 274 lawyers in Washington, Morgan Lewis
ranked 13th in the overall list of the 150 largest firms in the
capital. It was followed by K&L Gates with 185 attorneys, Drinker
Biddle with 88, Dechert with 86, Blank Rome with 85 attorneys and
Reed Smith with 81.
Montgomery McCracken
Chairman Stephen A. Madva said he has been cautioning his clients
and colleagues about jumping into the Washington market at this
point.
"I think anyone who thinks
they are going to get into it now is probably going to be well
behind everyone else," he said.
A firm has to have a client
base that would make use of a new market, and most firms enter a new
market because of client demands, not the other way around, Madva
said.
His firm had a Washington
office when he joined about 30 years ago. Madva said maybe the firm
was too parochial at that point, but it couldn't quite figure out
how to make best use of a presence in the capital. The group was
later acquired by another firm.
In May 2007, Montgomery
McCracken did lose partner Scott A. Coffina to a position in the
White House as associate counsel to the president. Madva said it's
the firm's expectation and hope that Coffina comes back to
Philadelphia.
"If he does, what he has
gained in terms of expertise is the kind of impetus that would cause
us to open an office [in Washington]," Madva said.
Binstock pointed to the
difficulty of growing a D.C. presence from scratch in this market.
Lateral partners are more cautious about moving in this economy and
would only join a firm that had a significant and meaningful
presence in the city, he said.
It's a little bit of a
toss-up in terms of which of the firms already in D.C. will be able
to best capitalize on the changing market, he said.
"The homegrown firms are at
an advantage because they have deeper benches, but some of the
out-of-town firms are more flexible with rates," Binstock said.
Ballard Spahr Andrews &
Ingersoll has had a Washington presence for a long time, now with
more than 50 attorneys. Firm Chairman Arthur Makadon agreed there
would be stepped up interaction with the government and increased
regulatory enforcement. There will also be a large number of
qualified government attorneys with regulatory experience looking
for new jobs.
But while the firm would be
open to bringing on new attorneys to the Washington office, Makadon
said restraints are in place that weren't there in past
administration changes — namely the troubled economy. Firms are
being more cautious, he said, about bringing in laterals.
Weil's
Lehman Bankruptcy Bonanza
By Nate Raymond
The American Lawyer
New York Lawyer
October 10, 2008
Weil, Gotshal &
Manges received a
$5 million advance in September from Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
for work leading up to the bank's bankruptcy filing, according to
court documents made public Wednesday.
Lehman reportedly retained
Weil Gotshal on Sept. 10. Five days later, Lehman filed for
bankruptcy. Lehman paid Weil a $5 million advance to cover legal
fees and expenses arising from Lehman's negotiations and efforts to
remain in business and to prepare for the possibility of the Chapter
11 filing if negotiations failed.
"The negotiations were
unsuccessful and the Chapter 11 cases resulted," Harvey Miller,
the senior Weil partner representing Lehman, said in a filing.
"[Weil] is applying the advance to the charges for the professional
services performed and to reimbursement of out of pocket expenses."
The sum contrasts with the
$51.8 million Weil earned from Lehman for work done in the 12 months
preceding September, according to the filing. And the $5 million is
nothing compared with what the total bounty could be from the Lehman
bankruptcy for lawyers. Lynn LoPucki, a professor at UCLA Law
School, estimates legal fees could come to $906 million, Bloomberg
reports.
The disclosure of Weil's
fees came as part of a formal application by the firm to be
retroactively hired as Lehman's bankruptcy lawyers. In a separate
filing, also on Wednesday, Lehman sought to employ Curtis,
Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle as its conflicts counsel. The
filing says Lehman asked Curtis Mallet to fill that role before the
bankruptcy proceedings commenced.
A spokesman for Weil did
not immediately return a request for comment. Calls to Curtis Mallet
were not immediately returned.
Both applications lay out
billing rates the two firms expect to charge Lehman. Weil says its
partners charge $650 to $950 an hour. Curtis Mallet says its
partners charge $675 to $785 an hour. Rates for counsel, associates
and paralegals also are detailed.
Curtis Mallet bankruptcy
partners Steven Reisman and Lynn Harrison will step in
as Lehman's lawyers when a potential or actual conflict of interest
arises with Weil, the filings say. The application says Curtis
Mallet has a history of serving as conflicts or special counsel,
including in the bankruptcy cases of Northwest Airlines and Calpine
Corp.
As part of the
applications, both firms laid their potential conflicts bare.
Miller, in his filing, listed more than 100 Weil clients who might
have an interest in the proceedings. Only seven of those, Miller
said, comprised more than 1 percent of the firm's revenue during the
last 12 months. The biggest of those were General Electric Capital
Corp. with 3.3 percent, Providence Equity Partners with 1.54
percent, and Microsoft Corp. with 1.49 percent, Miller says in the
filing.
(In 2007, Weil had $1.175
billion in gross revenue, according to the Am Law 100.)
Curtis Mallet listed only
four current clients with potential conflicts. The firm said in its
filing that several of the clients "have either executed a waiver
letter or indicated that they will execute a waiver" for Lehman's
case, including JPMorgan Chase Bank.
Curtis Mallet also says
that "as a one-time courtesy," it represented former client NYSE
Euronext Inc. on issues arising out of Barclays Capital Inc.'s
acquisition of Lehman's broker-dealer business and real estate.
Curtis Mallet says it had a waiver from NYSE, and that it no longer
represents the exchange in the bankruptcy.
A hearing on both
applications is scheduled for next Thursday.
In Market
Mess, Are Law Firms Vultures or Saviors?
And What's Up With Rudy?
By Vivia Chen
The American Lawyer
New York Lawyer
October 1, 2008
We're not sure who came up
with the idea, but law firms have now morphed from facilitators of
wealth into grief counselors for the financially stricken or
confused. Overnight, it seems, firms are handing out handkerchiefs
and setting up virtual information booths to help clients track the
latest developments on the financial crisis and bailout.
Akin Gump,
Bracewell & Giuliani, Fried Frank, Gibson Dunn &
Crutcher, Katten Muchin, K&L Gates, Susman
Godfrey, and Squire Sanders are just some of the law
firms that have formed "crisis centers" or "task forces" to respond
to the financial crisis and what it has wrought--"upheaval," "a
dramatic reconfiguration of the market", a "crisis in confidence."
Two that we know of--Fried
Frank and Paul Hastings--are marking the launch of their
groups today with planned roundtable "briefings." And all these
firms have teams of corporate, regulatory, litigation, criminal, and
governmental lawyers standing by to answer client calls.
Are clients calling? Well,
it's a bit early to tell--though the firms are hopeful that some
handholding and lots of unsolicited e-mails will blossom into paying
matters.
"There will be frenetic
activity; and there will be investigations and litigations,"
predicts Bruce McLean, head of Akin Gump. He adds that some
of the firm’s investment fund clients already have expressed
interest in acquiring or managing assets in the bailout.
It's probably no accident
that the firms brandishing their crisis units are not the prime
beneficiaries of the recent economic collapse. Not every firm can be
so blessed as Davis Polk, Cleary Gottlieb, Sullivan
& Cromwell, or Weil Gotshal & Manges to have a starring
role in the financial catastrophe. What's a mere mortal firm to do
but blow its own horn and make a play for a piece of the action,
right?
But the New York Daily News
has taken one firm to task for doing just this. The tabloid painted
a less than pretty picture of Bracewell & Giuliani's business
strategy in a September 26 article titled "Rudy Giuliani's 'crass
opportunism' reflects on Mac: Dems."
"Rudy Giuliani is
positioning his law firm to cash in on Wall Street's train wreck,"
the article starts. Moreover, the Daily News labeled Giuliani a
"prime surrogate for Republican McCain, who has called the economic
meltdown 'the greatest crisis since the end of World War II.'"
The criticism doesn't
bother Patrick Oxford, the firm's sonorous sounding chairman.
The Houston-based lawyer says he's proud that "Rudy has been very
heavily involved in helping us focus on the way government works"
and knows a lot of the key players in the bailout, including
treasury secretary Henry Paulson. Giuliani is a target, Oxford says,
because "he's a spokesperson for McCain."
It's only natural to deploy
the former New York City mayor to get business now he says, because
"Rudy is first and last a great lawyer."
We checked in with NYU
law professor Stephen Gillers on whether there's an ethics
question to consider in Bracwell & Giuliani's business development.
As Gillers sees it, Giuliani's mandate is to go out there and get
business.
"That's his job; that's why
the firm brought him in." The potential ethical problem lies with
McCain, Gillers says, "if he's getting advice from someone with a
vested interest."
As for what the future
holds, Oxford sees nothing morbid about law practice in the
post-financial disaster era. "There will be a tectonic shift [in the
financial sector]; we will see a regulatory tsunami," he predicts.
Will firms learn to play
vulture to survive? Not in Oxford’s view.
"It's more like a birth
rather than death," he says.
Which
Litigators Will Be Left Out in the
Cold in Wall St.'s Nuclear Winter?
By Julie Triedman
The American Lawyer New York Lawyer
September 16, 2008
Corporate types aren't the only people affected by the imminent
extinction of Merrill Lynch and Lehman Bros. There also are plenty
of litigators out there worrying about losing the companies as
clients.
Who represents Lehman and
Merrill when they go to court? Here's a quick rundown.
For Lehman:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind,
Wharton & Garrison
is defending the investment bank in ten matters filed in state and
federal court in the last two years (and 32 since 2003), according
to Westlaw. Paul Weiss partners Moses Silverman and Brad
Karp (when he gets a moment away from Citigroup) are working on
Lehman's derivative, auction-rate securities, and antitrust cases.
At Jones Day,
David Cardin--who led Lehman's defense in the Enron securities
class action--has handled 33 matters for Lehman since 2003. DLA
Piper worked on 17 matters, and Heller Ehrman and
Morgan Lewis & Bockius each worked on 16.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
has lately become a go-to firm for Lehman, taking the lead in six
cases filed in 2008, including a major mortgage-backed securities
class action. Partners Michael Chepiga and Paul Curnin
are leads on Simpson's Lehman cases.
For Merrill Lynch:
Skadden Arps Slate
Meagher & Flom
dominates the securities docket, working on more than 60 matters in
the last five years (and 28 in just the last two years). Partners
Jay Kasner and Scott Musoff are leads in cases that
include Merrill's recent settlement of auction-rate securities
litigation with regulators. Shearman & Sterling's Stuart
Baskin also represents Merrill in securities cases; he was lead
counsel for Merrill when the bank successfully challenged class
certification in the Enron case. Dickstein Shapiro has handled 380
matters, mostly tort and real estate, for Merrill since 2003; Munger
Tolles has represented the bank in more than 50 employment matters;
and Gibson Dunn has worked on about 60 securities and ERISA cases.
Calls to lawyers seeking
comment on whether they'd lose work didn't yield much more than an
off-the-record, "It's too soon to tell."
Meanwhile, the litigators
at O'Melveny & Myers must be doing cartwheels in the
hallways. Since Bank of America--a loyal client of O'Melveny's
litigation department--took over Countrywide earlier this year,
O'Melveny has already begun to pick up extra work generated by the
beleaguered mortgage company. With Merrill about to become part of
B. of A., O'Melveny might just be the best bet for out-of-work
securities litigators looking for someplace to send their resumes.
[Index
to Articles]
|