|

NY Lawyer Sees Plea Deal Unravel
After
Swindled Ex-Client Tells Judge He's Being Conned
By Vesselin Mitev
New York Lawyer
New York Law Journal
February 26, 2008
A plea deal that would have sent a disbarred Long Island attorney to
prison for as little as a year is off the table after his former
client last week read a victim impact statement to the sentencing
judge.
Melissa Seganti detailed in her statement how her former lawyer,
Hewlett-based Joseph Levine, swindled her out of a $300,000 personal
injury settlement and pocketed the money to pay off gambling debts.
"Please do not allow Mr. Levine to con you the way he conned me,"
Ms. Seganti asked Nassau County Court John Kase. "I am begging you
to give him the maximum sentence allowed, to not only restore my
faith in the judicial system, but to send Mr. Levine a clear message
that he will not get away with this."
According to Ms. Seganti, of Rockville Centre, she suffered a
"horrific injury" on Jan. 19, 2004, after sheet rock that was
delivered to her home fell on her, causing her to tear the meniscus
in her right knee and break her right wrist. After five surgeries,
she told the court, "I still take medication for pain and suffer on
a daily basis."
Initially, Ms. Seganti retained Mr. Levine's wife, Jennie M.
Dellaria to represent her, as she knew her from a beach club. Ms.
Dellaria told Ms. Seganti she wanted to spend more time with her
child and could no longer represent her, but her husband, Mr.
Levine, would handle the case.
In actuality, Ms. Dellaria had resigned from the bar after the
grievance committee began investigating an allegation that a check
she drew on her attorney trust account was dishonored.
In re Dellaria, 38 AD3d 14 (2nd Dept. 2006).
Ms. Seganti stated she settled her case at mediation for "much less"
than she and Mr. Levine had discussed. Mr. Levine agreed to reduce
his fee to $50,000, instead of the customary one-third of the net
settlement, or $100,000. However, she stated that when she tried to
collect her money, Mr. Levine stalled.
"Every single day it was excuse after excuse, phone call after phone
call, message after message, fax after fax, as to why I still did
not have my proceeds of the check," she said.
"The final story was the IRS had frozen his escrow account and he
was trying to have it reversed but, in the meantime he was going to
take out a second mortgage to pay me my money while this was being
cleared up," said Ms. Seganti, adding that Mr. Levine had actually
faxed her fake mortgage documents and arranged for her to speak with
people who were purported representatives of the lenders.
After hearing Ms. Seganti's statement, Judge Kase, in an unusual
move, pulled the one-to-three year sentence offered by the Nassau
County District Attorney's Office in exchange for his guilty plea
last month.
The judge offered Mr. Levine a three-to-nine year sentence instead,
in the alternative, an opportunity to take back his plea and take
his chances at trial. Mr. Levine faces up to 15 years in prison if
he is convicted of the grand larceny charge to which he pleaded
guilty.
Michael L. Soshnick, Mr. Levine's attorney, said he was surprised at
how "hot" Ms. Seganti was, as she had been reimbursed by the
Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection.
"She got a quarter of a million dollars for her personal injury
claim, so I don't think she did that badly," he said.
While stressing that "no one is ever justified" in stealing someone
else's money, Mr. Soshnick said that Mr. Levine had been warned that
he was being targeted by organized crime because he had not paid his
gambling debts.
"One night FBI agents knock on his door, confirm his identity and
tell him that pursuant to a court-ordered wiretap warrant my
client's name was mentioned and he was perceived to be an intended
murder victim," said Mr. Soshnick, of Mineola.
At that point, Mr. Soshnick said his client decided to steal the
money.
"I think it's obvious that my client is a sick person with a severe
disorder," said Mr. Soshnick of his client's gambling addiction.
Mr. Levine is due back in court today.
Mr. Levine had been suspended for two years from practicing law on
Dec. 3, 2001, after being convicted of conspiracy to commit mail
fraud. He was reinstated on April 15, 2005.
He resigned on April 6, 2007 and was subsequently disbarred on June
26, 2007 after four complaints of professional misconduct, including
the withholding of settlement funds from Ms. Seganti.
In re Levine, 43 A.D.3d 176.
NY Lawyer
Admits Stealing $2.1 Million
By Anthony Lin
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
February 15, 2008
A Manhattan lawyer has
pleaded guilty to stealing $2.1 million in client funds from an
escrow account.
Real estate lawyer Ira L.
Berman took money placed in his care as down payments on property
sales and used it for his personal and office expenses.
According to the Manhattan
District Attorney's Office, which announced the guilty plea
yesterday, at least eight people lost money that was placed in
escrow with Mr. Berman for the purposes of consummating property
sales primarily in Manhattan but also in Southampton, N.Y.
Prosecutors said about $3.2
million is missing, though $1.1 million remains in the escrow
account and will be distributed to Mr. Berman's victims.
Mr. Berman, 66, has already
been promised a sentence of three-to-nine years in prison on a
charge of first-degree grand larceny.
NY Lawyer
Accused of Stealing $266,000 From Client
By Daniel Wise
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
February 14, 2008
A Westchester attorney was arraigned yesterday on a charge he stole
nearly $266,000 from a client to cover personal debts and funds owed
to others.
The lawyer, Roger Cohen,
69, pleaded not guilty to one count of third-degree grand larceny
and was released on $250,000 bail, according to the Westchester
County District Attorney's Office.
Mr. Cohen was accused of
taking more than $294,000 from the proceeds of a real estate sale
for his client, who owned a real estate investment company. The
proceeds were supposed to have been placed in an Internal Revenue
Services account to be established for the client, whose name was
not released.
When the client demanded
the money's return, Mr. Cohen refunded only $28,671, according to
prosecutors.
NY Lawyer
Loses License for 30 Months
Over "Exorbitant" Fees, Ethical Breaches
By Daniel Wise
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
February 4, 2008
A Manhattan divorce lawyer who took nearly $41,000 in fees from an
escrow fund that had been designated for other purposes must be
suspended for 2 1/2 years, the Appellate Division, First Department,
ruled last week.
The panel also found that
the lawyer, Leah Larsen, 68, violated ethical rules by demanding an
"exorbitant" fee not backed by time records and by pressuring her
client to withdraw a complaint about the fee he had made to the
Dutchess County judge handling the divorce.
One judge on the panel,
Justice James M. McGuire (See
Profile), would have disbarred Ms. Larsen. But the
majority, consisting of Justices Richard T. Andrias (See
Profile), David B. Saxe (See
Profile), Eugene Nardelli (See
Profile) and John W. Sweeny Jr. (See
Profile), found the suspension severe enough in view
of Ms. Larsen's previously unblemished 28-year career.
According to the opinion in
Matter of Larsen,
M-5004, Ms. Larsen had told her client, Conrad Tebbetts, that he
could pay her with $40,750 from the proceeds of the sale of the
divorcing couple's home.
Justice James V. Brands had
ordered the money be paid into Mr. Tebbetts' 401(k). Mr. Tebbetts
suggested Ms. Larsen take only about $30,000 for the fee. Ms. Larsen
then sent her client a one-page bill for $168,400, claiming 852
hours of work at $200 an hour without detailing her work, the
decision reported.
When Mr. Tebbetts wrote to
Justice Brands to complain about the bill, Ms. Larsen threatened to
collect the entire $138,000 balance due at an arbitration unless he
withdrew his letter to the judge.
Lawyer's
Bullying Secretary Over Weight Demands
She Exercise Were Likely "Outrageous," Judge Rules
By Thomas B. Scheffey
The Connecticut Law Tribune
New York Lawyer
February 1, 2008
Noted Greenwich, Conn., criminal lawyer Philip Russell's conduct
toward his legal secretary will probably be considered "outrageous"
by the judge or jury hearing her civil trial, concluded Bridgeport,
Conn., Superior Court Judge Richard P. Gilardi, awarding her a
$75,000 pre-trial lien. Megan Lamothe is suing Russell for
intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Russell is currently on leave from his firm, serving a home
confinement sentence for his admitted destruction of a hard drive
containing child pornography while working for a Greenwich church.
The church's music director was implicated. Russell, a former Bronx,
N.Y., assistant district attorney, pled guilty to a single count of
obstruction of justice, and was spared prison time.
Lamothe says Russell warned her at her first job interview that
his law firm was in disarray and that he was a "yeller." Within a
few months "he fulfilled his prophecy," with Lamothe resigning after
the final outburst. During her course of employment, Russell said
she had been a good employee, but harangued the 300-pound woman
about her weight gain. She was diagnosed with uterine cancer in
February 2006.
She had diabetes and testified she was concerned about her
ability to have a child.
Russell told the court "it's none of my business," about her
health problems, but allegedly ordered Lamothe to exercise daily, to
walk from the train station, and, she says, "constantly belittled,
berated and screamed at her in front of her fellow employees," wrote
Gilardi in his Jan. 18 ruling. Russell allegedly told her to "move
her fat ass," called her "fat" and threw objects at or near her.
The alleged incidents of physical contact convinced Gilardi to
issue the pre-judgment remedy. At one time a workman broke a light
fixture in a stairwell and Lamothe called the building's management
to clean up the debris. Upset, Russell allegedly grabbed her arm and
brought her to the basement to get a vacuum cleaner. "When he
couldn't open the basement door because the vacuum was in the way he
pushed the door open, grabbed the vacuum, and threw it down the
stairs, breaking it," Gilardi noted.
He then allegedly took Lamothe nearby to the lobby of the Patriot
National Bank and "in front of the bank tellers and customers yelled
to ask if there was a dust pan or a broom" Lamothe could use, then
made her go get them.
On another occasion, Lamothe says she was outside smoking a
cigarette, and Russell "came up and grabbed the cigarette out of her
mouth and stomped it on the ground. He announced to everyone that
she is '(expletive) sick' and told her that if he ever saw her
smoking again she would be fired," Gilardi recounted. Russell
conceded he might have told Lamothe she was sick because she was
"fat," Gilardi noted, adding, "He said it was not beyond the realm
of possibility that he told plaintiff she was 'retarded.'"
Russell, a former member of the Connecticut Law Tribune's
editorial board, is defended in this case by Lewis H. Chimes of New
Haven, Conn.'s Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Chimes & Richardson.
"I think, given the very low standard for a PJR in Connecticut,
this wasn't a surprise, although I was surprised at the amount,"
Chimes said. "I think once the facts are known, it will be clear
this is a garden variety workplace stress situation. [The tort of]
Intentional infliction of emotional distress has a very high
standard, and 90 percent of claims are not allowed." He added, "I
don't think this case meets this threshold."
Lamothe is represented by the five-lawyer New Milford, Conn.,
firm of Guendelsberger, Collins, Henry & Guendelsberger. Her lawyer,
Rebecca E. Guendelsberger, said her client is currently employed in
a Bridgeport law office. She said the judge, "obviously recognized
that my client was hurt. This is something that no employee should
have to experience, especially someone who works for an attorney."
Disbarred
Lawyer Gets 41-Month
Term for Settling Clients' Cases, Keeping the Cash
By The Associated Press
New York Lawyer
January 18, 2008
A federal judge has
sentenced former Lafayette, La. attorney Mel Credeur to 41 months in
a federal prison and ordered him to pay more than $769,000 in
restitution.
Credeur accepted a plea
agreement last year and pleaded to one count of making false
statements to a bank and one count of forging securities of private
entities. He had been indicted in 2006 on charges that he lied to
banks by asking for extensions on attorney-client lines of credit,
even though he had already settled their cases.
Prior to the plea
agreement, Credeur also faced 23 counts of forging securities of
private entities, stemming from allegations that he settled his
clients' cases without their knowledge and then kept their
settlements by forging their signatures.
According to the plea
agreement, Credeur faced possible fines of more than $1 million and
up to 40 years in prison. U.S. District Judge Richard Haik on
Tuesday sentenced Credeur to 41 months on each count to run
concurrently and five years of supervised release afterward.
Credeur was disbarred in
April 2007, according to a release from the Louisiana Supreme Court.
Lawyer
Who Testified Against Partner for Ripping
Off Clients Is Now Charged With Doing the Same
By The Associated Press
New York Lawyer
January 4, 2008
A Memphis attorney who
testified last year against a partner who stole from clients now
faces accusations that he stole as well.
Phoebe Copeland claims in a
lawsuit that J. Richard Rossie stole more than $346,000 from her
after she granted him power of attorney to handle her estate.
Copeland hopes to block any
settlement between Rossie and Darrelle Miller, another client who is
suing the attorney, claiming Rossie stole more than $1 million from
her.
Rossie's attorney, James
Wilson, could not be reached for comment on Thursday.
Copeland's attorneys argue
that a settlement with Miller would make Rossie insolvent and unable
to pay Copeland.
Chancellor Arnold Goldin
has issued a restraining order temporarily preventing Rossie from
distributing any money.
According to a financial
statement, Rossie is worth $3.85 million, but Copeland's attorneys
say much of that is immune from judgment.
Copeland is accusing Rossie
of taking her money by writing at least 42 checks to himself between
August 2000 and June 2007, using funds from the law firm's escrow
account. He then deposited the money in personal accounts at various
banks, the suit alleges.
Rossie is a former partner
of John Houser Parker who pleaded guilty last year to stealing
nearly $2 million from clients and was sentenced to 22 years in
prison. Rossie testified against Parker at a sentencing hearing.
State prosecutor Steve
Crossnoe would not say whether he is considering criminal charges
against Rossie.
Lawyer
Who Sexually Assaulted Five or More Minors
at Courthouse Sentenced to 25 to 50 Years
By Amaris Elliott-Engel
The Legal Intelligencer
New York Lawyer
December 24, 2007
A former Philadelphia
criminal defense attorney convicted of several sex crimes with
minors, including an estimated five incidents in the Criminal
Justice Center, was sentenced last week to serve 25 to 50 years in
prison.
Larry Charles, 50, was
sentenced Thursday by an out-of-county judge, Berks Common Pleas
Senior Judge Albert A. Stallone, for sex crimes between 1999 and
2007 related to six girls authorities said Charles raped, molested
or groped. Charles pleaded no contest to crimes including rape,
indecent assault and corruption of minors. He received consecutive
sentences for the crimes related to each of the girls, including
seven to 14 years for raping a 5-year-old girl.
The girl was raped
vaginally and anally in both a motel in New Jersey and a bank
deposit room, said Jim Carpenter, the assistant chief of the
Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's family violence and sexual
assault unit. Authorities said Charles sexually abused the girls in
both of his offices in Center City and Southwest Philadelphia, in
the deposit rooms of banks, in the Criminal Justice Center (CJC) and
in motels.
The criminal case against
Charles broke open when sheriff's deputies found him with a
14-year-old girl after engaging in sexual contact with her in a
third-floor attorneys' lounge at the CJC on Martin Luther King Day
2007.
Deputies began searching
for Charles because they found it unusual that he was in the
building on a public holiday with a young girl; Deputy Andrew Ortiz
had to break down the door, and the girl was found cowering inside,
Carpenter said. Charles was found naked.
"We were very pleased with
this sentence," said Carpenter, who prosecuted Charles. "It reflects
the terrible damage he's done to these six girls. It also reflects
his offense not only against his profession but against the
courthouse where you seek justice and truth."
In addition to the sexual
encounter that the sheriff's deputies disrupted, Charles raped a
16-year-old in the rear room of the lawyers' lounge and also
sexually molested a girl in the anteroom outside a courtroom and
twice pulled girls onto his lap in the lawyers' lounge, Carpenter
said.
Charles' defense attorney,
Angelo Cameron, had sought for Charles to be sentenced to five to 10
years in prison and supervised counseling. He wanted a "controlled
environment and psychiatric treatment" for his client, Cameron said,
"because pedophilia is a mental abnormality."
Philadelphia Common Pleas
President Judge C. Darnell Jones II said that after Charles was
initially arrested, the Philadelphia Sheriff's Office, which
controls security for the CJC, reviewed if more restricted access
should be instituted for the building, but it was ultimately
determined that attorneys do need to meet and work inside the CJC at
varied hours.
It also was decided that
Charles' activities were an aberration so the sheriff's CJC
protocols were found to be sufficient, Jones said.
"It's one-in-a-billion for
a lawyer to do something like that," Jones said.
Two of the girls, and four
of the other girls were from the same family, Carpenter said.
"He basically used his
influence and his status to gain the trust of families, particularly
families in difficult circumstances, and then used that trust to
isolate the girls, buy them things, use treats and to groom them for
sexual contact," Carpenter said. He used force when the girls
resisted, Carpenter said.
Once the MLK incident
opened up awareness into Charles' activities, some of the other
victims came forward and law enforcement conducted an investigation,
including verifying motel records and bank surveillance tape
footage, the prosecutor said.
Charles was ruled to be a
sexually violent predator and a pedophile strongly attracted to both
pre-pubescent and post-pubescent children during a Megan's Law
hearing held before his sentencing, Carpenter said.
Cameron has not discussed
yet with Charles if he wants to appeal his sentencing. Charles will
not be eligible for parole until he's 75, Carpenter said.
Charles did have remorse
for his actions, Cameron said.
Charles agreed to an
emergency suspension of his legal license after his arrest in
January.
Corporate
Attorneys Mull Meaning
of NY BigLaw Partner's Indictment
New York Lawyer
December 20, 2007
By Anthony Lin
New York Law Journal
Has the
indictment Tuesday of Mayer
Brown partner Joseph P. Collins sent "a chill down the spine" of
transactional lawyers everywhere, as Mr. Collins' defense lawyer
said it should?
"It's definitely a wake-up call," said Mark S. Vecchio, a corporate
partner in the New York office of Venable. "I'm sure a lot of
lawyers read about this in the morning papers and said, 'Oh my
God.'"
Mr. Collins was indicted for allegedly helping executives at
commodities brokerage Refco Inc. hide massive losses from investors.
When those losses subsequently came to light, Refco was forced to
declare bankruptcy. In a statement Tuesday, Mayer Brown said Mr.
Collins had been put on leave but that the firm stood by its work
for Refco.
Four Refco executives, including CEO Philip Bennett, were also
indicted. Yesterday, one of the executives, Refco Capital Markets
President Santo Maggio, pleaded guilty to securities fraud and
conspiracy charges and agreed to cooperate in the case.
Since Enron and the savings and loan crisis before that, corporate
lawyers have been on the defensive about what responsibility they
have, if any, for the misdeeds of their clients. Many have argued
that even experienced lawyers cannot be expected to detect fraud in
a complex web of transactions.
"If he was just careless, there's a hell of a chill running down my
spine about this," said the head of one New York firm who asked to
remain unnamed. Another prominent corporate lawyer, who also asked
to remain unnamed, said the case would be watched closely in the
darkening economic climate.
"When the economy takes a hit, there is a tendency to look for
scapegoats to be taken out and shot," he said.
But most of the lawyers who spoke to the Law Journal yesterday are
not ready to rally around Mr. Collins. Citing the damning report of
the Refco bankruptcy examiner, they noted that it was indeed
possible that he crossed a line in the course of his representation.
"He may just be a bad apple," said Mr. Vecchio.
Indeed, in
announcing the indictment,
Southern District U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia seemed keen to allay
fears among the profession. He stressed that it was not a crime to
represent a client who had committed a crime and described Mr.
Collins as a lawyer who had become a full co-conspirator.
"[Mr. Collins] was not merely a lawyer whose client was committing
fraud and who should have caught on," said Mr. Garcia. "Collins
instead played an active and crucial part in perpetrating the Refco
fraud."
Where that line is drawn is a major issue of concern for corporate
lawyers though. While criminal cases against corporate lawyers over
client representation are extremely rare, high-stakes civil lawsuits
alleging law firms participated in corporate fraud have become
almost routine.
Mayer Brown itself was already facing a trio of big lawsuits over
its Refco work. A securities class action, a bankruptcy trustee suit
and a lawsuit by private equity group Thomas H. Lee, which bought a
controlling interest in Refco allegedly due in part to
misrepresentations by Mr. Collins, all loom over Mayer Brown. A
guilty plea or conviction in the prosecution of Mr. Collins would no
doubt hurt in all three civil cases.
British legal giant Clifford Chance is also facing civil allegations
in federal court in Philadelphia that it participated in fraud that
led to the bankruptcy of health-care finance company DVI Inc.
Clifford Chance is being represented in that case by William J.
Schwartz of Cooley Godward Kronish, who is also representing Mr.
Collins.
According to a recent survey of British law firm partners by
Legal
Week, a London-based affiliate of the Law Journal,
more than half of those polled said it was "possible" or "likely"
that a major law firm would collapse due to a lawsuit.
Law firms are particularly vulnerable to lawsuits because their most
valuable assets, lawyers, are highly mobile. Vinson & Elkins,
Enron's chief outside law firm, managed to survive that scandal and
the major lawsuits it spawned. But Jenkens & Gilchrist saw its
lawyers depart in droves after the firm's tax shelter practice
became the target of government probes and lawsuits. The firm shut
down earlier this year.
Solo
Faces 73 Criminal Counts for Leading 25-Year,
$2 Million Fraud Scheme
By Amaris Elliott-Engel
The Legal Intelligencer
New York Lawyer
December 12, 2007
A Market Street solo practitioner was charged yesterday with leading
a personal injury insurance fraud scheme since 1981 that bilked
insurance companies out of more than $2 million.
Personal injury attorney H.
Allen Litt, 58, of Bryn Mawr, Pa., has been charged along with 14
others in a scam involving falsifying personal injuries from made-up
or exaggerated slip-and-fall and auto accident cases and submitting
fraudulent insurance claims, Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne
Abraham said.
Litt was charged with 73
criminal counts, including 31 third-degree felonies of insurance
fraud and one first-degree felony of corrupt organizations.
Litt, who was admitted to
practice law in 1975, is accused of working with 100 runners who
both located potential imposter claimants or posed as claimants,
according to a grand jury presentment charging Litt and his
co-defendants.
The imposters would obtain
medical care from physicians selected by Litt and rack up inflated
medical bills via numerous visits to the Litt-selected doctors, the
grand jury charged. Some claimants actually took falls or had an
injury from another instance but still participated in a fraudulent
fall or accident claim at the behest of the runners, the grand jury
charged.
Litt would file fraudulent
insurance claims based on the doctors' bills and bogus photographs
taken by the runners, the grand jury charged. Four runners alone
brought in 300 claims for which insurance companies paid $2.5
million, according to the grand jury presentment. Runners received
commissions for bringing in cases and for taking pictures of
fraudulent accident scenes, the presentment charged.
Abraham cited the Charles
Dickens' story Oliver Twist about an orphan sucked into a crime ring
and called Litt the equivalent of the story's Fagin, the Dickensian
criminal mastermind.
The 25 years of alleged
fraud and "hundreds upon hundreds and hundreds of fake accidents"
probably involved much more than the $2.5 million, Abraham said.
Abraham's office plans to
seek a judge's imprimatur on an exception to the statue of
limitations in order to be able to prosecute Litt for more
fraud-based charges.
Litt was scheduled to be
arrested at the office of his attorney, Marc Neff, at noon
yesterday, Abraham said. A call to Neff's office was not returned.
There was no answer at Litt's 1515 Market St. office.
Litt also was charged with
one first-degree felony count of conspiracy, 21 third-degree felony
counts of theft by deception, 13 third-degree felony counts of
attempted theft by deception, four counts of second-degree
misdemeanor of false swearing, one first-degree felony count of
dealing in proceeds of unlawful activities and one third-degree
felony, count of criminal use of a communication facility.
Litt could face up to 20
years in prison and a $25,000 fine for each first-degree felony,
seven years in prison and up to a $15,000 fine for each third-degree
felony, and two years in prison and up to a $5,000 fine for each
second-degree misdemeanor.
The grand jury evidence
included testimony from three alleged runners for Litt: Lewis Crump,
a North Philadelphia man who said he was in the "accident business,"
James "Big Frank" Guinn, a taxi driver who based himself at 27th and
Tasker streets in South Philadelphia and Nathaniel Shaw, who said he
was a real estate investor and landlord in North and West
Philadelphia. All three men have already pleaded guilty to insurance
fraud as part of plea bargains.
They revealed Litt "relied
on a stable of runners like themselves to recruit friends and family
members who pretended to fall and faked injuries in order to file
false insurance claims. He then paid the runners, usually between
$100 and $1,000 per case," the grand jury charged.
According to the grand jury
presentment, the 132 claims brought by Shaw to Litt involved more
than $1 million, and Shaw was paid $47,000. The 36 claims brought by
Guinn to Litt brought in $100,000, and Guinn was paid $12,000, the
presentment said. Crump allegedly brought 10 to 12 cases to Litt.
The runners "worked on
commission and they were more than happy to recruit," Abraham said.
Shaw, who first met Litt
when he was involved in a legitimate trolley accident, said Litt was
aware the 132 cases he brought him were fraudulent, but Litt would
pretend with these clients that he was not involved in the fraud,
the grand jury charged. Litt, however, coached Shaw to choose
accident sites that involved a cracked sidewalk or a broken step and
no surveillance cameras; Litt also told Shaw to instruct the
imposter claimants to go to an emergency room and complain of
injuries from a fall, the grand jury charged.
Shaw's imposter-accident
recruits complained that Litt promised them big money if they made
frequent appointments with the doctors he referred to them, but that
their share of settlements were tiny, according to the grand jury
presentment.
Litt dismissed the
complaints, the grand jury charged, and said: "Don't worry about it.
They're not hurt anyway, and I got to pay the medical bills and got
to pay the doctors."
Iris Kurtz, the
receptionist in Litt's office, testified that Litt directed her to
improperly notarize releases of settlements without obtaining the
signatures of the clients, the grand jury charged.
According to the grand jury
presentment, Shaw learned that an investigation was being undertaken
of his and Litt's activities from two women he had recruited to take
part in fraudulent claims.
In response, according to
the grand jury presentment, Litt got Shaw to obtain retraction
statements from both women. Those statements were not submitted to
the district attorney, but instead were turned over to an
investigator and were introduced as evidence in front of the grand
jury.
Files were seized from
Litt's office in December 2005, and Litt asked Shaw to contact the
claimants involved in the cases in those files, but Shaw refused
during a phone call with Litt, the grand jury charged.
"In response, Litt
announced, 'things are going to get ugly,' and hung up," according
to the presentment.
Guinn said that he drew
claimants from 16 of his neighbors that he called the "Tasker Street
Crew," according to the presentment. Guinn said he followed Litt's
instructions to find holes in front of "well-off, but not too big,
businesses" that didn't have a lot of attorneys to fight a case but
would have more money to pay out than Chinese or Korean businesses,
the grand jury charged.
Abraham said that the
investigation is continuing into at least 10 doctors that Litt
allegedly referred fraudulent clients to.
The investigation into Litt
and his alleged cohorts began with an October 2004 tip from an
insurance fraud investigator with Chubb Insurance Co., Abraham said.
A search of Litt's office
revealed hundreds of documents, including accounting file cards,
canceled checks and accident scene photos, according to the grand
jury's presentment.
Litt was "really very
helpful to us," Abraham said. "He kept great records."
Linda Perkins, chief of the
District Attorney's Office's Insurance Fraud Unit, said Litt is an
exception to the rule and that most attorneys are honest and
withdraw a claim for a fraudulent accident.
Joshua Pitts, 63, of
Philadelphia, was Litt's most active runner, according to the
presentment. Over 400 checks totaling more than $190,000 were issued
to Pitts from Litt, according to records seized from Litt's office,
the grand jury charged.
Pitts and three of his
adult children were charged each with one count of insurance fraud
and related offenses, according to the District Attorney's Office.
Ten alleged co-conspirators, including Crump, Guinn and Shaw, have
already been arrested. Some have pleaded guilty as part of plea
bargains and have agreed to testify against Litt.
Samuel Stretton, an
attorney who writes an ethics column for Pennsylvania Law Weekly,
The Legal's sister publication, and who often represents jurists in
legal quandaries, said that Litt will most likely be able to
continue practicing law pending the outcome of his court case.
But the Disciplinary Board
of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court can seek more immediate action on
Litt's law license by requesting that a hearing be held on
suspending Litt from practicing law on an interim basis, Stretton
said.
Attorney
Get 15 Years in Prison for
Bilking Elderly Clients Out Of $13 Million
New York Lawyer
December 7, 2007
By John Pacenti
Daily Business Review
MIAMI -- Saying he would mete out a longer sentence if he could,
U.S. District Court Judge Alan Gold handed down the strictest prison
sentence possible under federal guidelines -- 15 years -- for
one-time high-flying Miami attorney Louis S. Robles for bilking
elderly clients out of more than $13 million.
Gold had previously rejected a plea deal worked out for Robles by
the U.S. Attorney's office that would have resulted in 10 years
behind bars for the 59-year-old lawyer, saying it was too lenient.
Besides serving 15 years in prison, Gold ordered Robles to pay
$13.5 million in restitution and work 900 hours of community service
in a nursing home. He must also relinquish his law license for good.
The attorney represented more than 7,000 asbestos clients from
the late 1980s through February 2003. Federal prosecutors said he
operated an elaborate Ponzi scheme. Clients -- many elderly and
dying -- would not be paid until he misappropriated money from other
clients. Nearly 4,400 clients were defrauded, the government said.
Robles pleaded guilty to three counts of mail fraud on Sept. 17
for misappropriating settlements in asbestos lawsuits, defrauding
thousands of clients nationwide. He paid little or nothing to
clients while living in the lap of luxury with two full-time
servants, a private plane and a waterfront mansion on Key Biscayne.
The lawyer "abused the special trust that his clients placed in
him," U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta said in a statement late
Tuesday. "Robles sought out clients who were dying and cheated them
out of millions of dollars, so that he could finance his own
extravagant lifestyle."
Attorney
Indicted for Helping Clients Avoid $4.6M in Taxes
By Shannon P. Duffy
The Legal Intelligencer
New York Lawyer
November 29, 2007
A Montgomery County lawyer allegedly concocted schemes to help eight
clients and two of his employees hide more than $23 million in
income and avoid paying more than $4.6 million in taxes, a federal
grand jury charged in a 168-page indictment handed up yesterday.
Attorney Bernard J.
Bagdis, 58, who has an office in Blue Bell, Pa., was arrested
yesterday at his home in Norristown, Pa. The indictment accuses him
of allegedly assisting his clients - including two doctors, a lawyer
and several small-business owners - in funneling large portions of
their income through shell corporations.
Also named in the
indictment are eight of Bagdis' clients and two of his employees.
U.S. Attorney Patrick
Meehan alleged in a news release that Bagdis "was so proud of his
schemes that he boasted he would write a book and call it Federal
Tax Fraud, The User's Guide."
The indictment alleged that
Bagdis has not filed an individual federal tax return since at least
1990 and was captured on tape saying the government investigation of
him would be "a fight to the death."
Bagdis was charged with one
count of attempting to impede and obstruct the IRS, seven counts of
conspiracy, 16 counts of aiding and assisting the preparation of a
false tax return, six counts of failing to file individual income
tax returns and five counts of failing to file currency transaction
reports.
Attorney
Arrested in Internet Sex Sting at Statehouse
By John McCarthy
The Associated Press
New York Lawyer
November 1, 2007
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- An
attorney arrested in an Internet child-sex sting in the basement of
the Ohio Statehouse thought he was going to meet a 15-year-old girl
he had met online, authorities said.
Barry Mentser, 48, a former
children's services lawyer, was taken into custody Wednesday moments
after the police officer who conducted the sting testified two
floors above in favor of a bill that would increase penalties for
such offenses.
Lt. Jeff Braley, a
detective from Hamilton Township in Warren County in southwest Ohio,
said he posed as the girl to set up a Statehouse meeting with the
man.
"I said, 'I'm in Columbus.'
He said, 'I'll meet you anywhere,'" Braley said.
Braley, who said he'd been
communicating with the man for about a year, testified before the
Senate Criminal Justice Committee in favor of a bill that would set
mandatory sentences of one to five years for the offense of
importuning by telecommunications, aimed at sexual offenders who
prey upon underage children through the Internet.
Braley said he didn't
arrange the sting at the Statehouse to draw attention to the bill or
his testimony, but that he knew the man was in the Columbus area and
that police were aware of his identity.
Undercover Columbus police
officers spotted Mentser in the Statehouse cafeteria, where Braley
had set up the meeting, said city police spokesman Sgt. Rich Weiner.
A security video later made available by Statehouse officials showed
a man identified as Mentser walking from one side of the basement to
the other, then back across, toward the cafeteria.
The Statehouse is a popular
stop for school field trips, but there were none scheduled
Wednesday, and the building had few visitors besides people
attending legislative sessions and hearings, said Statehouse
spokesman Gregg Dodd.
Mentser, of nearby Gahanna,
is married with three children, The Columbus Dispatch reported. He
was charged with importuning and attempted unlawful sexual conduct
with a minor, Weiner said. If convicted he could face from one year
to 30 months in jail.
Defense attorney Steve
Palmer said Thursday he expected Mentser would enter a not guilty
plea.
"He had no prior record
whatsoever, criminal or otherwise, and this sort of came out of left
field," Palmer told WCMH-TV.
His client remained in the
Franklin County jail Thursday afternoon, hours after a judge set
bond at $50,000. Mentser was scheduled to return to court Nov. 9 for
a preliminary hearing.
Current Ohio law doesn't
require prison sentences for people convicted of importuning by
telecommunications. Many judges say sexual acts typically don't
occur in undercover stings, so they take a "no harm, no foul" stance
and sentence offenders to just weeks in jail and probation, Warren
County Prosecutor Rachel Hutzel said after testifying before the
committee.
Braley said he'd arrested
about 35 people as the result of such sting operations in the past
year.
"The Internet has served as
a very fertile preying ground for these predators," Braley told
committee members.
Mentser was a staff
attorney for Franklin County Children's Services from 1987 to 1990,
when he resigned, agency spokeswoman Kay Marshall said. He had no
direct contact with children outside of court while employed there
and no complaints were filed with the agency about him, Marshall
said.
Disbarred
NY Lawyer Headed
to Prison for Ripping Off Clients
By Daniel Wise
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
October 31, 2007
A disbarred lawyer pleaded guilty yesterday in Manhattan Supreme
Court to stealing $148,000 from at least 20 clients.
The ex-lawyer, Richard
Boter, has agreed to a sentence of at least one year in prison and
to pay $160,000 in restitution and forfeiture, according to the
Manhattan District Attorney's Office.
Mr. Boter was the twelfth
attorney to be netted by the office's probe into the use of runners
by personal injury lawyers to bribe hospital employees to gain
access to potential clients. Mr. Boter had purchased cases from
various runners, at least one of whom had bribed hospital employees
to gain confidential information about patients, who were often
being treated for injuries sustained in automobile accidents,
according the the district attorney. To date, the 12 lawyers caught
in the investigation have agreed to pay restitution or forfeiture of
$1.7 million.
With regard to Mr. Boter,
who was
disbarred last month for treating clients like "commodities",
the district attorney's office said he had stolen client funds by
keeping their share of settlement proceeds. He was able to do that
by settling cases without his clients' permission and then forging
their signatures on release forms forwarded to insurance companies
to obtain the release of the settlement funds, the office said.
Missing Local Lawyer Turns Up Dead
By Douglas S. Malan
The Connecticut Law Tribune
New York Lawyer
October 30, 2007
The saga of missing Clinton, Conn., lawyer Jonathan Hoyt has ended
with his suicide in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Hoyt, a 59-year-old business law attorney believed to have
embezzled close to $700,000 from about a dozen clients, was found by
police Monday around 11 a.m. in his one-bedroom apartment that he
had been renting since Aug. 30.
Cedar Rapids police Lt. Kenneth Washburn said there was "no
indication of foul play," without providing further details.
Dr. Donald J. Linder, chief medical examiner of Linn County in
Iowa, said that Hoyt's death was "a well-planned suicide," but
declined to comment further until a final autopsy report is ready
within a couple of weeks.
Police were called by Hoyt's landlord, Richard G. Hileman, a
semiretired lawyer from Cedar Rapids. Hileman said that Hoyt began
renting the apartment two months ago under the name Jim Bragg of NY
Biz Systems, a company Hoyt portrayed as assisting companies going
through bankruptcy and other financial difficulties.
Hileman received a letter in the mail from Hoyt on Monday: "It
said that by the time I had received the letter, he would've
committed suicide and not to call 9-1-1 because he didn't want
anyone to be hurt rushing over to the apartment," Hileman said.
Hoyt signed the letter using his real name, Hileman noted.
"I didn't quite know what to make of it," Hileman added. "I
thought I was getting his rent check or his 30-day notice" of
vacating the apartment for which he was paying $470 per month.
Hileman said he drove to the apartment building and told his wife
to call the police. Hileman added that he had had only brief
encounters with Hoyt but had found him to be a "very likeable guy.
"He had only been here two months, and I really didn't know the
gentleman," Hileman said. "[Hoyt's stay] was just unremarkable until
[Monday]."
Hoyt had been missing since early July. Clinton police officers
investigating the case estimate that
Hoyt
embezzled almost $700,000.
Fugitive
Local Lawyer Leaving Few Clues for Cops
By Douglas S. Malan
The Connecticut Law Tribune
New York Lawyer
October 15, 2007
Police say the trail has
gone cold in the case of missing Clinton, Conn., lawyer Jonathan
Hoyt.
The 58-year-old business
law attorney was last seen in early July before he left behind his
tan 1999 Lexus and cryptic letters in which he confessed to
embezzling funds from clients.
Police said they received
tips from acquaintances and colleagues in July and August, but leads
in the case have since come to a halt.
"There hasn't been anything
for a while," said William F. Tate, a public information officer
with the state police. "Nothing has come from [tips we received this
summer]. We're still looking."
The state police Criminal
Intelligence Unit has taken over the case, which is standard
protocol after 30 days. The unit is working with local police in
Westbrook, where Hoyt lived, and in Clinton, where he based his
practice.
Clinton Sgt. Joseph Flynn
said Hoyt has "totally dropped off the grid" with no credit card or
cell phone activity. Flynn, who led the Clinton Police Department’s
investigation of Hoyt, estimates that the missing lawyer embezzled
close to $700,000 from about a dozen clients. Flynn added that he
doesn't know if Hoyt is alive or dead.
"I wouldn’t be surprised
either way, at this point," he said. "There's a good chance he's
offed himself, but I don't know how or where. It's pretty baffling."
Family in Shock
In one letter sent to
grievance officials in July, Hoyt cleared his assistants and his son
Christopher by taking sole responsibility for "the thefts that have
happened concerning The Hoyt Law Group, LLC Connecticut's office."
Hoyt wrote a letter to his
son, dated July 7: " have embezzled funds from my clients … . Like
most lawyers who fall into this trap I always did it with the idea
that I would repay the funds, but of course once I started down this
slippery slope there was nothing but failure for me at the end."
Hoyt's confessions and
disappearance come "as a shock to the family," Christopher said in
an interview. Christopher Hoyt practices intellectual property,
business and criminal law out of the firm's New York office.
"I'm not at liberty to make
a statement that might jeopardize the investigation," he added. "The
family is very concerned. Nobody knows where he is."
Flynn said he believes
Christopher Hoyt is telling the truth.
The elder Hoyt was last
seen on July 6 at his Clinton office, according to police. His Lexus
300, four-door sedan was found by police on July 17 in a parking lot
near the Intermodal Transportation Center in Bridgeport.
On July 20, Middletown
Superior Court Judge Julia L. Aurigemma accepted the state
disciplinary counsel's application to immediately suspend the elder
Hoyt's law license.
Legal Aid
Lawyer Admits Videotaping Female Co-workers
By Barbara Ross and Bill
Hutchinson
New York Daily News
October 25th 2007
A former Legal Aid Society
lawyer pleaded guilty Wednesday to using a spy camera to videotape
female co-workers changing their clothes in their office.
Peter Barta won't go to
jail for behavior he admitted was "creepy, disrespectful, juvenile
and stupid," but he will lose his law license.
"I offer no excuse or
justification for my action. My behavior was inexcusable," added
Barta, 32, in a letter he submitted to Manhattan Supreme Court
Justice Michael Obus.
But before admitting to
felony crime of unlawful surveillance, he asked that the charge be
dismissed or reduced to a misdemeanor.
"I'm not asking for
forgiveness, but an opportunity to earn it," Barta of Queens said in
his letter.
Obus refused to reduce the
charges, but agreed to go along with a recommendation from
prosecutors to show mercy when Barta is sentenced Dec. 3.
Under the plea agreement,
the case will be dismissed and sealed once Barta completes a year of
probation and counseling.
A Georgetown University Law
School graduate, Barta began working as a Legal Aid attorney in
2001.
Between May 2004 and
October 2006, he used a $179 Sharper Image minicam hidden in a clock
to videotape female colleagues changing their clothes. The women
would use an office to change out of their casual clothes into more
dressy attire to appear in court.
When investigators searched
Barta's Kew Gardens home, they found it full of porn and adult toys,
according to court papers.
Claims of
Adultery, Forgery Have Firm
Lawyers Looking for Way Out, Dodging Subpoenas
New York Lawyer
October 15, 2007
By Nathan Carlile
Legal Times
Daniel Portnoy wasn't
having much luck. For days he'd been tracking his quarry. First he
had called his house. Then he began stopping by unannounced, only to
be turned away by a woman who said the man he sought was out of
town. But now, on the morning of Tuesday, Oct. 2, after days of
mounting frustration, he finally had his target in his sights.
As Portnoy watched from a
parked car up the block, Albert Beveridge III, name partner of the
Washington-based environmental boutique Beveridge & Diamond, pulled
his silver Acura up to his home in the tony neighborhood of Wesley
Heights in Northwest Washington. As Beveridge headed to his front
door, Portnoy moved in, but the 72-year-old corporate litigator was
too quick for him, doubling back into his car before Portnoy could
reach him. As Portnoy ran back to his own car, Beveridge raced down
the street to shake his pursuer. The chase was on.
As Portnoy would later
recount in a sworn affidavit, he soon caught up with Beveridge at a
stoplight at the corner of Nebraska and New Mexico avenues, but when
he tried to talk to Beveridge, the lawyer responded by executing a
quick U-turn, brushing Portnoy out of the way. But Portnoy still
managed to make his long-thwarted delivery, sticking a subpoena
under the Acura's windshield wiper as Beveridge sped away.
The incident was just the
latest twist in a sordid story that has ensnared partners at
95-lawyer Beveridge & Diamond in allegations that include adultery
and forgery. The dispute stems from a bitter divorce battle between
firm partner John Guttmann and his wife, Nancy Lasater, a
nonpracticing attorney who was previously co-chairwoman of the Law
Practice Management Section of the D.C. Bar and a solo practitioner
who often represented firms on ethics issues.
The couple's real-life "War
of the Roses" has pulled a litany of well-known Washington lawyers
into the fray, including the elusive Beveridge, who is now senior
counsel at the firm and was subpoenaed to testify about his role as
a former trustee of the firm's 401(k) program.
It was Lasater, acting pro
se, who persuaded Maryland state Judge Durke Thompson to issue the
subpoena to Beveridge, based on her allegation that Guttmann forged
her signature while taking out a loan from the firm's 401(k) plan in
1993. That loan is one of three Lasater is investigating.
"I'm entitled to all of the
documents surrounding these three loans," Lasater says. "I need
information."
The firm argued against
subpoenaing Beveridge because of his age and the fact that nearly 14
years have passed since the disputed loan was executed. But that
argument didn't get far with Thompson.
"If Mr. Guttmann is dipping
into the 401(k) without Ms. Lasater's permission at the time and
altered documents and now says 'I can't remember what I did,' it
doesn't look too good," Thompson said during a Sept. 24 hearing on
the firm's motion to quash the subpoena, according to a transcript.
"And it may not look too good for Mr. Beveridge either if, indeed,
there isn't an adequate documentation in the file."
The firm and Guttmann both
say Lasater's allegations are much ado about very little. "Mr.
Guttmann denies Ms. Lasater's allegations and intends to defend
himself vigorously," says Guttmann's attorney, Mark Carlin, a
partner at Ain & Bank. "The only fair inference is that incomplete
and misinformation was given to the Legal Times in a
deliberate effort to embarrass Mr. Guttmann and to extract a larger
settlement for Ms. Lasater."
The firm hired Evan Miller,
an Employee Retirement Income Security Act partner at Jones Day (who
was formerly at Hogan & Hartson) and Hogan & Hartson ethics partner
John Keeney Jr., to look into Lasater's allegations. Both lawyers
concluded there was no wrongdoing on the part of the firm.
Which isn't to say there
were no problems. "I wish that we had been more scrupulous with the
paperwork," says Robert Brager, managing partner of Beveridge &
Diamond, "because then this wouldn't be an issue.
"The firm," he adds, "is
behind John 1,000 percent."
Signing Your Wife's Name
Guttmann is an
environmental litigation partner focusing on commercial and
securities cases. According to a court document filed by Lasater, he
is the billing partner for the firm's largest client, Sunoco Inc.
Lasater cites his high profile as an incentive for the firm "not to
have to report itself for disciplinary proceedings under the
affirmative whistle-blowing obligations."
In 1995, Guttmann was
tabbed by The American Lawyer as one of the 45 best lawyers under 45
years of age. At the time, Guttmann was serving as managing partner
of the burgeoning environmental firm. When he stepped down at the
end of his six-year run in January 1996, he left behind a record of
tremendous growth. Under Guttmann's guidance, Beveridge & Diamond's
head count and profits doubled, jumping to 60 lawyers and gross
revenue of about $60 million.
But it was also during this
period that Guttmann served as one of three trustees to the firm's
401(k) plan. While a trustee, he took out three loans from his
401(k) over a three-year period beginning in 1992. In total,
Guttmann borrowed $103,693 from the retirement plan. But taking
those loans required spousal approval. And because of what the firm
acknowledges is "sloppy bookkeeping," there is now a dispute over
whether that approval was ever obtained.
Lasater claims she had no
knowledge of the three loans. She says it was only through discovery
during the divorce proceedings that she came across copies of three
promissory notes. "He took money out of our account without my
consent," Lasater says. "I don't know where that money went." While
she acknowledges that the first and third loan appear to have her
signature, she maintains that the second loan, for just under
$33,000, does not have her signature. About that fact, there appears
to be no dispute.
According to an August 2007
deposition, Guttmann says he wrote his wife's signature on the
promissory note dated April 1994, but contends it was with her
blessing. She insists that's not the case. "I haven't the faintest
idea," said Guttmann, when asked in his deposition if he was aware
of any other 401(k) participants at the firm receiving loans without
the paperwork being done first.
Further clouding the matter
is the fact that records show that the effective date of the loan
was in December 1993, but that the promissory note wasn't signed by
the firm administrator until February 1994. And Guttmann did not
sign the loan document for both himself and Lasater until April
1994. Beveridge, who was then a trustee of the firm's 401(k)
program, signed his name without dating his signature. Beveridge
declined to comment for this story.
These points in particular
drew Judge Thompson's attention.
"It's certainly not Ms.
Lasater's signature, and it's a little fuzzy whether she consented
or whether he just forged it," Thompson said during the Sept. 24
court hearing, according to a transcript. "What does that mean? That
means he [Guttmann] is committing acts of moral turpitude which
could affect his license to practice. ... And if the law firm
through the 401(k) and its trustees hasn't done what they were
supposed to do, guess what, the law firm is now liable, OK?"
An 'Alternative'
Investment?
Beveridge & Diamond was
made aware of the loan dispute in a letter Lasater sent to the firm
in December 2006. The firm responded on Jan. 7 with a letter from
its general counsel, Cynthia Lewis, saying it would look into the
allegations.
The firm then hired Jones
Day's Miller to investigate, and he concluded that there were no
ERISA violations. In a letter to Lasater sent in March, Miller said
the loan had been paid back in full and at a reasonable rate of
interest. Miller added that "any adverse effect on the value of Mr.
Guttmann's 401(k) plan account would be both speculative and
trivial. And, in any event, the statute of limitations on ERISA
violations you assert has long since expired."
Miller says that prior to
being withdrawn, the money Guttmann took from the 401(k) plan was
invested in treasury bills and money markets, which provided the
investment return of roughly 3.8 percent. The loans Guttmann repaid
had an 8 percent interest rate.
"It becomes an alternative
investment that, at the end of the day, had more money in it as a
consequence of the loan being at 8 percent," Miller says. "Ms.
Lasater actually saw her interests as a contingent beneficiary
enhanced."
But Lasater says she does
not know what Guttmann did with the money he borrowed.
ERISA lawyers agree that
there appears to be no violation by Guttmann, but there is
puzzlement over the loan being approved before Guttmann signed the
promissory note.
"It would seem odd that a
firm would permit the execution of a promissory note well after the
loan had been executed to the participant," says Kenneth Robbett, an
ERISA lawyer at Robbett & Robbett.
Accounting for an Affair
For Lasater, the issues
aren't limited to Guttmann and the disputed loans. Dean "Holly"
Cannon, a partner at the firm and managing partner from 1996 through
the summer of 2001, admitted in an August 2006 deposition to having
an affair with Guttmann that began in May 2005, six months before
Guttmann filed for divorce, according to a transcript of that
deposition. She is also helping Guttmann pay his soaring legal fees
in the case. According to court documents and copies of personal
checks produced by Guttmann in the litigation and provided to
Legal Times by Lasater, Cannon has contributed more than
$300,000 to help Guttmann pay his lawyers at Ain & Bank. Cannon
declined to comment. According to court documents, Guttmann has
signed promissory notes to repay the money to Cannon.
Lasater alleges in a court
document that Guttmann is borrowing money from Cannon and claiming
it as a loan in order to "reduce both his obligation to support his
family and to negate his equitable obligation to reimburse my legal
fees." Court documents show Guttmann's assets totaling $2 million,
with a net worth of $1.6 million. He claimed a gross monthly wage of
$45,695. Guttmann declined to comment.
Beveridge's Brager, who
says he has been friends with Guttmann for roughly 20 years, has
also been pulled into the fray. According to both Lasater and Brager,
he told a psychologist appointed by the court to determine custody
of the couple's two children that they would be better off with
Guttmann.
"Nancy has accused me of
unethical conduct for talking to the psychologist," Brager says.
"She's threatened to report me to the D.C. Bar. That claim on me
reflects on her."
This isn't the only pending
litigation between Lasater and Guttmann. In August 2005, before
Guttmann filed for divorce, Lasater filed a fraud case against him
in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Md., alleging he moved
money to a secret bank account. In that case, Lasater, who is
seeking $2 million in punitive damages, is represented by Timothy
McEvoy, a partner at Odin, Feldman & Pittleman. The case has been
stayed by Judge Ann Harrington until the divorce is settled. The
divorce trial date is Oct. 29.
Moreover, there remains a
question as to whether Guttmann could be subject to an ethics
investigation by the D.C. Office of Bar Counsel.
The investigation done on
the firm's behalf by Hogan's Keeney determined that Beveridge &
Diamond attorneys overseeing the 401(k) did not violate any ethics
laws. "We were responding to a letter that said attorneys who
received the authorization to execute the loan acted unethically,"
Keeney says. "And that's just not true."
But Keeney says he did not
specifically look into whether Guttmann acted unethically. Barry
Cohen, a legal ethics and malpractice partner at Crowell & Moring,
says the D.C. rules of conduct for lawyers are clear. "If he signed
her name without her permission then it would be, for ethics
purposes, a dishonest act," Cohen says. "It would fall under the
category of dishonesty and could result in a censure or a
suspension. We'd need to know the facts and the motivation."
Lawyer's Assistant Wore Wire
for FBI in Fee Scam Case, Defense Claims
By Brett Barrouquere
The Associated Press
New York Lawyer
October 9, 2007
LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- An
assistant to one of three lawyers charged bilking clients of
millions of dollars in a diet drug settlement wore a wire and turned
over notes of meetings to the FBI, a defense attorney said.
Rebecca Phipps, an
administrative assistant to Melbourne Mills Jr., secretly recorded
conversations as early as June 2006 as the FBI investigated how
Mills, William Gallion and Shirley Cunningham handled a $200 million
settlement over the diet drug fen-phen, said Mills' attorney, Jim
Shuffett of Lexington.
"It appears reasonably
certain that an intentional violation of (Mills') right to counsel
occurred and that a hearing is necessary to develop and remedy the
parameters of that violation," Shuffett said.
Gallion and Cunningham, who
are part owners of Preakness winner Curlin, and Mills are jailed in
northern Kentucky pending a trial in January on charges of
conspiracy to commit wire fraud. A civil court has ruled that they
owe at least $42 million to their former clients.
The use of Phipps as an
informant became known in a motion filed last week seeking to
exclude any evidence that Phipps turned over to FBI agent Mary
Trotman. Shuffett wants U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman to
hold a hearing to determine whether the evidence turned over by
Phipps can be used against Mills in a criminal trial set for Jan. 7.
The U.S. Attorney's Office
in Lexington did not immediately return calls seeking comment
Tuesday morning.
Mills wants 63 handwritten
notes and 293 pages of e-mails and other memos Phipps turned over to
federal authorities excluded from evidence in the case. Those notes
involve meetings she attended between Mills and former attorney
William Johnson or current attorneys James Shuffett and Calvin
Fulkerson.
Federal prosecutors turned
over Phipps' information as part of the discovery process. But,
prosecutors also told Shuffett that some of the information provided
by Phipps could be protected under attorney-client privilege.
Typically, attorney-client
privilege does not extend to others who hear conversations between
attorneys and their clients. However, because Phipps was working as
Mills' legal assistant, the privilege also extends to her, Shuffett
said.
According to Shuffett's
motion, Phipps wrote in July 2006 that her attorney, Burl McCoy,
called and told her that an FBI agent on the case wanted her to
attend a meeting at the office of Johnson, who was then representing
Mills in a civil lawsuit regarding the settlement.
McCoy said Phipps has
cooperated with the FBI and will most likely continue to cooperate.
Trotman has testified that
the attorneys, who represented about 440 clients sickened by fen-phen,
settled the case for $200 million.
Trotman said the clients
received $74.8 million from the settlement. Gallion received $30.4
million; Mills, $23.7 million; and Cunningham $20.7 million. A chunk
of the settlement also went to other attorneys and employees
involved in the case.
Bertelsman has said that
millions of dollars are still unaccounted for.
Cunningham, 52, and Gallion,
56, bought Curlin for $57,000 as a yearling through their Midnight
Cry Stable. They sold controlling interest in the horse in February
for a reported $3.5 million to a group composed of Jess Jackson,
founder of Kendall-Jackson wines; Satish Sanan's Padua Stables; and
George Bolton, an investment banker.
Fla.
Prosecutor Charged in Sex Sting Kills Self
Had Been Detained While Allegedly
Trying to Fly to Molest 5 Year Old Girl
Associated Press
October 6, 2007
DETROIT - A federal
prosecutor from Florida accused of flying to Detroit last month to
molest a 5-year-old girl committed suicide in his cell Friday in
federal prison, authorities said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
John D.R. Atchison was found unresponsive, taken to a hospital and
pronounced dead, said Felicia Ponce, spokeswoman for the Federal
Bureau of Prisons in Washington. A previous suicide attempt was
foiled in September, according to authorities.
Atchison was being held in
a special housing unit in the prison in Milan, about 36 miles
southwest of Detroit.
The administrative
detention area houses all levels of prisoners, and Atchison had a
cell to himself, Ponce said.
She declined to say
how Atchison killed himself or whether he was on suicide watch,
saying the death was being investigated.
Atchison, 53, was arrested
last month at Detroit Metropolitan Airport after weeks of Internet
conversations between the prosecutor and a detective posing as the
mother of a 5-year-old girl, authorities have said.
Carried presents for girl
He was
carrying presents for the girl, including a doll and hoop earrings,
and also had sexual materials, including petroleum jelly.
After his arrest Atchison
was placed on suicide watch, but it was lifted at the request of the
defense, after Atchison assured a U.S. magistrate he wouldn't harm
himself.
Two days later, Atchison
used a sheet in his Sanilac County jail cell to try to hang himself
around 4 a.m. Another inmate yelled out to jailers, who kept
Atchison from hurting himself, according to Sanilac County Sheriff
Virgil Strickler. Atchison was later moved to the Milan prison.
Atchison, a married father
of three, was an assistant U.S. attorney in northern Florida, based
in Pensacola. Gulf Breeze, Fla., residents have described him as a
respected figure who coached girls' softball and basketball in a
park a few blocks from his home.
A statement released Friday
by his lawyer, James Thomas, said Atchison had "done a lot of good
in his life."
"Unfortunately, he is going
to be judged by his most recent charges and what we have read in the
media, and not by the goodness, hard work or by the love of his
family," the statement read.
The statement also said
Thomas would file a request to have the case dismissed.
Authorities have said they
found no cases of child molestation in Florida involving Atchison,
who worked mostly on tax and financial crime cases.
The prosecutor had been
charged with three felonies. The most serious charge was crossing
state lines with intent to have sex with someone younger than 12.
Conviction carries a minimum 30-year prison sentence and a maximum
of life.
Suspended
NY Lawyer Charged
With Selling Old Man's House Out From Under Him
By Anthony Lin
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
October 5, 2007
The Queens District
Attorney's Office has announced criminal charges against a suspended
lawyer who allegedly helped sell an elderly man's house out from
under him.
Attorney N. Stephen Sukhdeo
is facing larceny and forgery charges for participating in a scheme
with real estate broker Mohammed Keita.
According to the
prosecutor's office, the two men forged the signature of one of Mr.
Sukhdeo's clients in order to sell his house while he was
hospitalized with a stroke. The house was first sold to a company
owned by Mr. Sukhdeo's brother and then "flipped" to Mr. Keita's
daughter.
Queens District Attorney
Richard A. Brown said the scheme netted its participants hundreds of
thousands of dollars.
Messrs. Sukhdeo and Keita
each face up to 15 years in prison.
Mail
Fraud Scheme Leads to Guilty Plea;
Lawyer Admits He Orchestrated Plot to Defraud Companies
By Jeff Coen
Chicago Tribune
September 28, 2007
A Chicago attorney pleaded
guilty to mail fraud charges in federal court Thursday in connection
with a scheme to cheat insurance and rental car companies by staging
phony traffic accidents.
Gerald Penovich
acknowledged in a plea agreement that he instructed and directed
some of those involved in the plot, which involved purposely
colliding vehicles and filing false claims and bogus medical bills.
He was the last of six
defendants in the case to plead guilty, and all are to be sentenced
by U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve in December. Penovich acted as
his own lawyer in the case, court records show. A call to his law
office Thursday was not immediately returned.
Prosecutors said leaders of
the scheme recruited players, orchestrated the fake accidents and
directed the filing of false reports.
Those taking part allegedly
were told to consult with Penovich and others about making false
claims, and they were instructed to visit medical clinics that were
in on the scam. Fraudulent medical records were created at those
facilities, according the plea agreement, and fraudulent insurance
claims were filed with the victimized companies.
In one 1998 incident,
Penovich filed a personal injury claim of $64,000 and a damage claim
of $9,750 with Avis Rent a Car, court records show.
Avis eventually paid out
$24,000, according to the plea agreement, based in part on bogus
bills created by the Devon Family Medical Center.
In a second incident the
next year, Penovich allegedly helped the schemers after a staged
two-car crash. Penovich was accused of filing claims for $25,000
with Enterprise Rent-a-Car and an insurer, which were settled for
$13,000.
Defendants associated with
the Devon Family Medical Center generated false treatment records in
that incident as well, court records show.
Prosecutors are expected to
recommend Penovich be sentenced to between 27 and 33 months in
prison. The maximum penalty for the two counts of mail fraud
Penovich has pleaded guilty to is 10 years in prison.
I Covered
up Church Porn: Att'y
Associated Press
New York Post
September 28, 2007
A prominent Connecticut attorney admitted yesterday that he
destroyed evidence in a child pornography investigation at a
Greenwich church.
Philip Russell
pleaded guilty in federal court in Bridgeport to one count of
misprision of a felony, which means he had knowledge of a felony but
didn't report it.
Russell was charged Feb. 16
with destroying a computer that contained child pornography at
Christ Church in Greenwich.
Russell, a former attorney
for the church, is accused of obstructing an FBI probe that led to
the January conviction of the church's music director, Robert Tate,
for possessing child pornography.
Former President George
Bush attended the church while growing up, and funeral services for
his parents were held there.
Russell was released on
$100,000 bond and faces eight to 14 months in prison.
"I just want to make
perfectly clear how sorry I am for what I did in this case," he said
yesterday.
NY Lawyer
Accused of Saying He'd Make Charges
"Go Away" as Comehither Line
By Joel Stashenko
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
September 28, 2007
A special prosecutor will
investigate a woman's claim that a part-time public defender
promised he would make her drug case "go away" if she had sex with
him.
Latoya Gorton contends she
had sexual encounters with attorney Matthew Swedick at his law
office in Albany while he represented her. Mr. Swedick was assigned
Ms. Gorton's case after she was arrested for having 39 grams of
crack cocaine and $10,000 in a dwelling she shared with her
boyfriend. In June, Ms. Gorton pleaded guilty to fifth-degree
criminal possession of a controlled substance under a plea agreement
that carried a two-year prison sentence.
Albany County Judge Thomas
A. Breslin allowed her to withdraw her plea last week after her
allegations against Mr. Swedick surfaced through her attorney,
William Martin of Brooklyn.
Another Albany County
judge, Stephen Herrick, appointed attorney Michael Koenig to
investigate Ms. Gorton's charges after District Attorney P. David
Soares of Albany removed himself from the case.
Mr. Swedick, who has been a
part-time public defender in Albany County since 1999, has been
placed on administrative leave with pay, according to county
spokeswoman Kerri Battle. Officials are also reviewing his actions
in a personnel inquiry separate from Mr. Koenig's, Ms. Battle said.
James E. Long, Mr.
Swedick's attorney, said the allegations are false. Mr. Long said
that as a public defender, Mr. Swedick was in no position to make
the charge against the woman "go away," as she contended.
"It's absurd," Mr. Long
said.
NY Lawyer Disbarred for Treating
Clients Like "Commodities"
By Anthony Lin
New York Law Journal
New York Lawyer
September 28, 2007
The Appellate Division,
First Department, has
disbarred a Manhattan personal injury
lawyer for a litany of misconduct, including paying a
non-lawyer "runner" to refer cases to him.
Richard Boter had pleaded
guilty in Nassau County to misdemeanor charges relating to that
scheme, but the Manhattan appellate court noted that Mr. Boter, 32,
had also faced a wholly separate disciplinary proceeding charging
him with 51 counts of professional misconduct. These included
presenting his clients with overreaching retainer agreements,
settling cases without his clients' consent, falsifying clients'
signatures on documents and lying to clients to convince them to
withdraw disciplinary complaints.
Mr. Boter also allegedly
commingled client funds with those of his practice.
In disbarring him, the
court noted that though the lawyer "knew at the time that his
actions were illegal and wrong, he displayed no remorse and seemed
insensitive to interests of and risks to his clients, and he
considered personal injury law to be a competitive 'business' to be
expanded through referrals, with clients treated as commodities."
Ex-top
Lawyer Robles Faces Prison
By Jay Weaver
The Miami Herald
September 19, 2007
Dressed
in a drab prison uniform, once high-flying lawyer Louis Robles
pleaded guilty in federal court in Miami to charges of stealing
$13.5 million in settlements from thousands of elderly clients
ailing from exposure to asbestos.
Robles, 59, who lived in
a Key Biscayne mansion before his legal empire collapsed, could
spend his golden years in federal prison.
The disbarred personal
injury attorney
faces up to 15
years behind bars on three
mail fraud
convictions. He must also forfeit the asbestos
settlements -- though
prosecutors could only recover $1.1 million
U.S. District Judge Alan
Gold accepted Robles' plea deal on the brink of trial, saying it
was ''more appropriate'' than previous deals that had limited his
ability to punish him more harshly. The earlier deal required
Robles to plead guilty to two mail fraud offenses, which carried a
maximum 10-year prison sentence.
His sentencing is set for
Dec. 4. Gold revoked his $1 million bond and placed him in the
federal detention center last spring after Robles had spoken with
his girlfriend about fleeing.
During Tuesday's hearing,
Robles said nothing beyond declaring his ''guilty'' plea and
responding ''yes'' to standard questions about the plea from the
judge. His defense lawyer, Hector Flores, also said little. Any
apology from Robles would come at his sentencing.
Prosecutors portrayed
Robles as a scoundrel who defrauded about 4,400 clients by
pocketing millions in asbestos settlements to pay for a lavish
lifestyle: a 9,000-square-foot home on Biscayne Bay, ski
properties in Telluride, Colo., and leased apartments in Los
Angeles and New York, which he used for his ventures into the
motion picture and recording industry.
During the 1990s, Robles
and wife, Ruth, now divorced, were spending about $2 million a
year in mortgage payments and living expenses.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Michael Davis called Robles' modus operandi through the 1990s and
early 2000 period ''an ever-expanding pyramid scheme.'' He stole
asbestos settlements from trust accounts and kept almost all the
money for himself while paying small amounts to some victims,
Davis said.
The ''gap'' between his
client obligations and trust account funds grew at a rate of $1
million annually, Davis said. By September 2002, he had
''misappropriated'' $13,522,159.92 owed to clients, leaving less
than $25,000 to pay them.
Robles allegedly tried to
cover up the theft through sleight-of-hand accounting practices by
charging bogus expenses to clients.
Davis said Robles'
victims, whose claims ranged from a few hundred dollars to
$185,000, were agreeable to receiving a fraction of the money
because they have waited so long -- more than a decade in some
instances. The victims are expected to receive roughly 8 percent
of their total settlements.
Among them: A 79-year-old
widow from Jacksonville, who was going to testify against Robles
at trial. He owed her $177,952.87 but will now get $14,236 under
the payout plan.
''She is living on a
fixed income and has not received any settlement money in many
years,'' Davis wrote in court papers in July. ``She is going blind
and fears that she will die soon without receiving any of the
money owed to her during her lifetime.''
Robles, who was initially
charged in a 41-count indictment, plead guilty to defrauding three
asbestos victims in 2001-02. His victims -- many of whom have died
or are dying from lung-related diseases -- are spread all over the
country.
Both prosecutors and a
private attorney assigned by the Miami-Dade Circuit Court to take
charge of thousands of Robles' cases pushed for the plea deal.
They said there would be no more money to recover from Robles --
other than the $1.1 million frozen after his indictment last year.
Miami attorney Thomas Tew,
who represents Robles' asbestos victims in a class action case,
hailed the final agreement. Said Tew: ``This will mean a lot to a
lot of people who otherwise won't be fully compensated for their
losses.''
Federal Prosecutor Arrested for Making Date
to Have Sex With 5-Year-Old Girl
By David N. Goodman
The Associated Press
New York Lawyer
September 19, 2007
DETROIT -- A U.S.
prosecutor accused of using the Internet to arrange for sex with a
5-year-old girl flew to Michigan carrying sexual materials and
presents for the child, authorities said Tuesday.
John D.R. Atchison, 53, of
Gulf Breeze, Fla., was arrested Sunday at Detroit Metropolitan
Airport after several weeks of Internet conversations between the
prosecutor and a detective posing as the mother of a 5-year-old
girl, authorities say.
Officials said Atchison, an
assistant U.S. attorney in Florida, made the trip anticipating a
sexual encounter but was arrested instead. He was carrying presents
for the girl, including a doll and hoop earrings, and also had
sexual materials, including petroleum jelly, Sheriff Mark Hackel
said.
A federal grand jury added
a charge Tuesday of crossing state lines with intent to have sex
with someone younger than 12. Atchison also faces charges of use of
the Internet to seek illicit sex and interstate travel to engage in
illicit sexual contact. He could face up to life in prison.
Defense lawyer James Thomas
declined to comment after the hearing.
Atchison's boss, U.S.
Attorney Gregory R. Miller, said that his staff was "deeply saddened
by the arrest." He said his office was cooperating with the FBI,
U.S. prosecutors and Michigan investigators and believed that "in
the end, justice will be served."
The status of Atchison's
employment was unclear.
The prosecutor is a married
father of three, and Miller said that the staff was concerned about
Atchison's family. "Our thoughts and prayers go out to them," he
said.
According to an FBI
affidavit, Atchison sent an instant message Aug. 29 to Macomb County
sheriff's Detective Linda Findlay, who was posing as a mother who
was willing to let men have sex with her daughter.
Atchison messaged her that
he was "very much a family man," FBI agent Matthew A. Bowman said.
The prosecutor and
undercover detective held almost daily online chats after that, and
he told her that he wanted to have sex with the young girl, the FBI
agent said.
Federal agents obtained a
search warrant Monday for Atchison's Florida home. There was no word
on what they sought or found.
Also Tuesday, a youth
sports organization in which Atchison is active said it was placing
him on leave until the charges were resolved. Atchison is president
of the Gulf Breeze Sports Association, which runs youth baseball,
softball, cheer leading, soccer, football and basketball programs.
In a statement, the group said he had been involved with the
organization for a decade.
Famous Litigator Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Clients,
Faces Up to 15 Years in Prison
September 18, 2007
By The Associated Press
New York Lawyer
MIAMI -- A once-prominent
attorney who specialized in asbestos lawsuits pleaded guilty Tuesday
to fraud charges involving thousands of former clients and could
face up to 15 years in federal prison.
Louis S. Robles, 59,
pleaded guilty to three counts of mail fraud under an agreement with
prosecutors that requires restitution of $1.3 million be paid to
about 4,400 of his former clients. U.S. District Judge Alan Gold set
sentencing for Dec. 4, with each count carrying a potential
five-year prison term.
Last spring, Robles agreed
to plead guilty, but Gold rejected it because the maximum possible
sentence was 10 years in prison. Gold expressed concern that the
sentence was not long enough, especially considering the restitution
was only a fraction of what Robles allegedly stole from clients.
Prosecutors, however, said
the $1.3 million in a frozen bank account was the only amount that
could be recovered from Robles, who has fallen far from his
once-flamboyant lifestyle. An attorney who once jetted around the
country and was known for his stylish clothes now is being held
without bail at Miami's federal det |