|

N.Y.
Court Establishes First Statewide
Guidelines for Mediators, Neutral Evaluators
Joel Stashenko
New York Law Journal
July 24, 2008
New York has established
for the first time statewide guidelines for the qualifications and
training of mediators and neutral evaluators who are called into
cases by judges seeking to encourage out-of-court settlements.
Chief Administrative Judge
Ann Pfau issued the new rules earlier this month with the approval
of the Administrative Board of the Courts, which is comprised of
Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye and the presiding justices of the four
Appellate Division departments.
The guidelines require that
mediators who want to make the rosters from which judges make
assignments must have at least 24 hours of training in basic
mediation skills and at least 16 hours of additional training in
specific mediation techniques in the types of cases referred to
them.
The rules also limit those
wanting to be assigned as neutral evaluators to those who have
practiced law or served as judges for at least five years with
"substantial experience" in the kinds of cases referred to them.
Mediators seek common
ground between adversarial parties on which mutually acceptable
terms can be reached for settlements. Neutral evaluators gather
evidence from the parties and give an opinion about what the parties
can expect as the outcome if their dispute goes before a court.
The guidelines require
continuing legal education of at least six hours every two years for
both mediators and neutrals.
Establishment of the
guidelines represents a coming of age for alternative dispute
resolution (ADR) and is acknowledgement of its growing use by courts
in New York, Pfau said.
"We thought that the ADR
program in this state had reached a point of maturity and acceptance
where it made sense to have uniform standards for all mediators in
the state," she said in an interview. "I think this will be very
helpful in continuing to develop this very vibrant ADR program that
we have."
Until now, administrative
judges have set the qualification requirements for the mediators and
neutral evaluators on court rosters. Daniel M. Weitz, ADR
coordinator for the Office of Court Administration, said many of the
"several hundreds" of neutrals on the rosters already meet the
requirements but that others may be some hours short and will have
to receive more training to stay listed.
The qualifications for
court-appointed mediators are similar to those recommended by an
advisory group to the OCA. A member of the group, Simeon Baum of
Resolve Mediation Services in Manhattan, said Wednesday that
training sessions for would-be mediators typically last for three
days or about 24 hours total.
"I think this is further
evidence that ADR is here on the scene," said Baum, the first
chairman of the New York State Bar Association's
newly formed Section on Dispute Resolution.
"It shows a greater level of sophistication in recognizing that
people are going to be engaged in a refinement of mediation
practices."
Baum said that the
popularity of ADR grew starting in the 1990s as parties, especially
in commercial and matrimonial cases, began to see its success at
reaching settlements in sometimes-acrimonious disputes and avoiding
costly litigation.
Court-appointed arbitrators
have their own qualifications rules under the state courts'
Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program and are not covered by
Pfau's decree. Arbitrators are most typically called in to decide
small claims cases, according to Weitz.
The new guidelines also do
not apply to private mediators or neutrals called in by parties in
disputes outside the aegis of the courts.
"It only has bearing on the
courts, but it might have an indirect impact on the broader
mediation field because people will start to see standards being
set," Baum said.
Pfau's rules also recognize
the potential for blending the roles of mediator and neutral
evaluator, a source of some controversy in the ADR field.
Lela P. Love, director of
the Cardozo Mediation Clinic at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of
Law, said it has long been in dispute whether the role of mediator,
which entails acting as a facilitator of a settlement, can be
performed along with the more disinterested functions of a neutral.
The new rules stipulate
that the same neutral in the same case can perform the two roles,
provided that person meets the training and background requirements
of both mediator and neutral evaluator.
"Frankly, that issue has
never truly been resolved, but it is a little resolved by this
rule," Love said Wednesday. "I think New York is going to become a
leader by the promulgation of this rule."
Love was also a member of
the OCA advisory committee on professional qualifications and other
ADR issues.
If the courts are going to
put their imprimatur on ADR by maintaining rosters of neutrals, it
is also in the courts' best interests to set standards for their
qualifications and continuing education, Love said.
"It should be good, it
better be good, if it is a public system," she said. "The education
and training of neutrals is a critical pillar for ensuring quality."
The Commercial Division is
most apt to maintain rosters of qualified ADR practitioners,
especially in New York, Westchester, Nassau and Erie counties, said
Weitz. Some Family Courts also maintain rosters, including New York
City's, and often refer child custody and visitation disputes to
mediation.
Under Pfau's rule, the
Unified Court System will set criteria for training programs.
"It is not our intention to
necessarily remove people who are currently serving on rosters if
they are in need of some additional training," Weitz said Wednesday.
"Our office will sponsor training throughout the near future for
those interested."
Nothing in the rules
exempts nonattorneys from acting as mediators, as long as they do
not function in the dual role of neutral.
Baum said he knows of
several excellent mediators who are not attorneys, though he said
the vast majority are. In fact, Baum said he has pondered long and
hard about the skills needed to effectively resolve disputes between
others.
"I think there is an
interesting question: What makes a good mediator and whether that is
something that comes from personality or character or years of
experience, judgment, a certain tact, a sense of humor -- all the
various personal skills that make for a good mediator," Baum said.
"Some of it comes from life experience and not necessarily through a
training course."
Still, he added, "It
definitely can't hurt to spend more time in training."
Study
Shows Early Litigation
Settlements Save Businesses Money
Sheri Qualters
National Law Journal
June 9, 2008
A study of court
settlements in personal injury lawsuits against businesses estimated
companies could save an average total of $114,000 per claim or
$670,000 for severe injuries by promptly settling cases instead of
fighting them in court.
The study, which was
published this month in the Columbia Business Law Review,
also projected $32,000 in savings from lower legal expenses, or
about $211,000 for cases involving severe injuries.
The study based the
projections on how much it would cost businesses to make "early
offers" to pay out-of-pocket medical expenses and wage losses of
injured claimants. The quick settlements would reduce legal fees and
"pain and suffering" damages.
University of Virginia
School of Law
professor Jeffrey O'Connell and California
State University-Northridge associate professor Patricia Born
wrote the study, which analyzed court settlements of personal injury
and defective product injury cases against companies between 1988
and 2004 in Texas and Florida.
The study proposes an early
offer system that would give businesses 180 days to offer claimants
no-fault-like payments of medical expenses and wage losses not
otherwise covered plus an additional 10 percent for attorney fees.
Although claimants would
not be compensated for pain and suffering, the study predicted a
payment wait time of 2 1/2 years less than going to court.
Under the model claimants
could only turn down offers if the defendants' actions involved
gross misconduct, which the study found only involves about 4
percent of business liability cases, said O'Connell.
"Thus a crucial element of
the tort system's deterrence mechanism is retained: Injured parties
could still win suitably large monetary awards under the early
offers model for both economic and non-economic damages in clear
cases of aggravated error," O'Connell said.
Our View:
Less Painful Split
Brevard Judge Is Right to Encourage
Alternative to Courtroom Divorce Battles
FloridaToday.com
June 24, 2007
Akinder, gentler divorce?
For many people who've been
through an ugly split, the idea pushes the limits of reality.
Anger, recriminations and
revenge often become motivating factors when a marriage falls apart.
The results can be
emotionally crushing to children and spouses, and loss of needed
financial assets to soaring legal costs.
That's why even the
possibility of ending unsalvageable unions without all that
collateral damage should be encouraged.
And it's why we're glad to
see an approach already used in Canada, Europe and increasingly
around the nation, is coming to the Space Coast.
Its called collaborative
divorce, and it brings together the parties' lawyers, neutral
financial experts, mediators and mental-health specialists to
address divorce-related problems on many fronts.
Brevard County Judge Dean
Moxley recently signed an order to encourage lawyers to recommend
collaborative divorce where applicable, rather than battle out the
breakup in the courts.
Proponents say the process
differs from mediation by reducing mediation's still-somewhat
adversarial aspect.
While Moxley's order isn't
law, anyone concerned with reaching the least-painful-possible
divorce should give it serious consideration.
The benefits for couples
who want to cooperate and are willing to fully disclose all assets
could be substantial.
For example, divorce in
Brevard County typically takes two years and costs $10,000 to
$20,000. Collaboration costs many thousands of dollars less.
It also could accomplish in
hours what might otherwise involve months of legal maneuvering and
bring the situation to a close in as little as 30 days, says
Rockledge-based mental health counselor Robin Siebold, a supporter
of the process.
Should the hoped-for
agreement not work out, the couple still can go to court, she says.
The hard sell could be to
attorneys worried the trend might cut into their income.
However, when attorneys see
how it relieves them of the late-night calls and constant
emotionally driven demands, some decide to handle these cases
exclusively, Siebold says.
Collaborative divorce is no
cure-all.
Spouses who believe their
mate would hide assets, or can't be trusted to carry through on
agreements, would be better off with a good lawyer in a courtroom.
But in the rest of the
cases, where spouses want to save money, avoid ugly attacks and
protect children from turmoil, it's a smart solution.
We commend Moxley for
giving it his support and we encourage lawyers who are looking out
for the good of families to take up the cause.
Mediators Help Parties Avoid Trial
Small Claims Court Volunteers Save County Taxpayers $55,000
By Richard Prior
St Augustine Record
October 11,
The three young women had once been roommates, but two were now
suing the third, who allegedly left some obligations behind when she
moved out.
All three stood at the lectern in
Small Claims Court, giving brief overviews of their plight to County
Judge Patti Christensen.
The two plaintiffs said the
defendant left without paying all her bills. She also took some
items that didn't belong to her, they claimed.
All were eager to go to trial. Then
they took the judge up on her recommendation to talk it all over
first with one of the court's more valuable assets.
A mediator.
"Our mediators are all volunteers,"
Christensen said. "Some are former automobile dealers and business
owners; others are retired military big-wigs. One is a lay-rabbi;
another is a former teacher."
Notably, none are former attorneys.
"Attorneys get bogged down in the
vagaries of the law," the judge said.
Typically, Christensen said,
mediators meet in private with the parties and ask each to explain
their position. They don't take sides.
The object of talking it all over
with a mediator is to work out a settlement that is agreeable to
both sides without resorting to a trial.
"Because cases in Small Claims Court
involve disputes of $5,000 or less, mediation is an economical way
to resolve a dispute," said Christensen. "Litigants often can work
out a solution by merely telling the mediator what they think they
can prove and what their witnesses will say."
If the parties are far apart in
their claims and don't want to sit down with a mediator, Christensen
will schedule a trial date.
Many of the cases involve disputes
about rent and security deposits, the judge said. Others are over
substandard work or unpaid bills.
"The more unusual cases have
included claims for a bad hairdo, determining custody of pet birds
and whether someone's dog killed chickens," said Christensen.
For every four cases that are
resolved at trial, mediators resolve one for the judge, she said.
Twenty mediators, trained and
certified by the Florida Supreme Court, come to the courthouse twice
a month to help Christensen and County Judge Charles Tinlin.
Their efforts save county taxpayers
an average of $55,000 a year, said Christensen.
"On top of that," she added, "the
mediators donate their time, so neither the county nor the litigants
have to pay for their services."
Mediator Martin Cohen caught a case
on Tuesday between a woman and a contractor who was supposed to
renovate her home.
The workers walked off the job
without completing it, said the woman, who wanted a $5,000 refund.
Before he retired the first time,
Cohen was a director at Union Carbide, a Fortune 100 company, in
Danbury, Conn. He later opened his own small firm, an engineering
services business, in St. Augustine.
He started visiting the area in 1983
and became a full-time resident in 1993. He lives in St. Augustine
Beach and has been a mediator for about 3 1/2 years.
"I'm interested in working with
people," said Cohen. "It's really a challenge to get people to put
aside their differences and come to an agreement."
Mediator John Alberti has been
living in Ponte Vedra since 1993.
He had been an executive with a car
rental company and an automobile dealership in Portland, Maine.
Alberti has been a mediator for
about eight years.
"I like the legal environment," he
said. "I like helping people resolve their disputes.
"And it's an opportunity to give
back to the community."
The local mediation program has been
"very successful and beneficial to the county," Christensen said.
She noted that Oct. 15-22 is
National Mediation Week and extended her appreciation to Paul
Greenfield, "who is retiring after many years of outstanding
service."
"We have very high-quality folks who
are helping us out," the judge said.
Anyone interested in becoming a
mediator should call Judy Carroll, Mediation Supervisor at the
Daytona Beach office, for more information. The phone number is
(386) 239-6504.
Male-Female NY Duo
Take Unique Approach to Divorce Mediation
By Peter C. Beller
New York Lawyer
New York Law Journal
April 25, 2006
The shortest divorce
agreement that Gae Polisner and Christopher S. Jay mediated took
just two weeks, start to finish.
The couple "had spent $63,000 in four months or so of litigation,"
recalled Ms. Polisner, 41, the female half of Divorce Mediation
Services in Huntington. "Literally, they had a court date two weeks
off. They said you've got two weeks to resolve this. To this day
they seem pretty happy with their resolution."
That example is extreme — the pair's typical clients have not
started litigation and take several months to reach a settlement —
but mediation is gaining wider acceptance in New York as a faster,
cheaper and more humane alternative to litigation.
Ms. Polisner and Mr. Jay, 39, say they are one of the few
male-female mediation teams in the state. Aside from that, what sets
them apart in an unregulated field that includes social workers and
psychologists is that they both attended law school. She found
litigation unfulfilling and became a full-time mediator; he still
litigates matrimonial cases.
The two met through Mr. Jay's wife's hairdresser, tried working
together and found that couples liked getting both a male and a
female perspective.
Unlike most court-employed mediators, who usually address only
parenting issues, private divorce mediators can tackle the other two
major components of divorce: equitable distribution of assets and
financial support.
Ms. Polisner and Mr. Jay take a formal approach, instructing couples
to get separate lawyers to act as advisors and having them fill out
court-recognized forms like a statement of net worth.
At an initial meeting, fees are discussed ($400 an hour) and both
parties sign a confidentiality agreement so they can speak without
fear their remarks will be used against them in court.
Then the negotiations, with Ms. Polisner and Mr. Jay acting as
neutral guides, begin around a conference table in their Huntington
office.
A final agreement, which must be ratified by a judge to be binding,
usually requires five to 10 sessions lasting two hours or more.
The process can stretch for months, partly because of the difficulty
in matching schedules but more often because a spouse puts the
brakes on when they feel things are moving too fast.
"The emotional issues are so interwoven with all the financial
issues and custodial issues," said Mr. Jay. "Sometimes you have to
deal with those issues before you can deal with basic simple facts."
The pair depends on word-of-mouth referrals from
"mediation-respectful" attorneys for their clients, most of whom
approach them before entering the court system but after the
decision to split has already been made.
Couples have to be willing to sit down and talk for mediation to
work but that does not mean the process is not contentious and
spouses sometimes storm out of the office in a huff. The pair uses a
variety of techniques to help couples hammer out an agreement,
including "caucusing" with each spouse individually and relying on
their legal background to give clients a sense of how an issue might
play out in court.
They succeed in reaching a final agreement 90 percent of the time or
more, they say.
In the case of the couple with a court date, the expensive
litigation and looming deadline provided motivation, but there was
still plenty of disagreement.
"They were fighting over custodial and time issues with their child,
first and foremost, but also all their financial issues," she said.
That meant marathon sessions lasting until two or three in the
morning.
Growing Popularity
Divorce mediation has been around for decades but was, until
recently, looked upon less favorably here than in other states,
especially California, which pioneered court-ordered mediation of
child custody and visitation in divorce proceedings.
Resistance came from attorneys, who sometimes see mediation as
encroaching on their livelihoods, and the courts, which are wary
about referring cases to mediation that involve domestic violence or
a similar imbalance of power between parties.
Mediation is not a licensed profession as much as it is a set of
skills, taught in a variety of settings to a variety of people,
including therapists and others with no legal education.
Court-mandated or in-court mediation programs generally apply their
own training criteria. There are numerous professional organizations
and the American Bar Association has adopted a model set of
standards and guidelines for practicing. The New York bar has not.
There are no statistics showing what percentage of divorce mediators
are lawyers or how many divorces in New York are mediated but the
practice is growing nationwide.
Cheryl Hepfer, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial
Lawyers, said the number of members taking mediation training has
grown substantially and some of the academy's older lawyers are now
mediating full-time, a practice that would have been unthinkable 20
years ago.
New York has had in-house mediators in Family Court since the
mid-1980s. Divorce cases, however, are heard in state Supreme Court,
where several pilot programs are under way in Erie, Rochester and
Nassau counties and in New York City, said Dan Weitz, coordinator of
alternative dispute resolution for the state's Office of Court
Administration.
After spending 20 months scrutinizing New York's divorce procedures,
a commission led by former Appellate Division, Second Department,
Justice Sondra Miller, in a final report issued in February,
endorsed expanding the use of mediation. It cited "high settlement
rates, party satisfaction with both the process and the outcome and
higher rates of compliance with agreements than with court orders."
The commission found that 44 states have laws or court rules that
encourage mediation (New York is not one of them) and 14
automatically refer custody and visitation issues to mediators. New
Jersey and Connecticut make extensive use of other forms of
alternate dispute resolution, such as early settlement panels, as
well.
Among New York commission's suggestions: a rule authorizing state
judges to refer couples to mediation for parenting issues, which
"would represent a significant culture change for the court as well
as the Bar."
The report also calls for a law protecting confidentiality in
mediation, an important guarantee for couples if they are to proceed
openly with each other, mediators say.
The courts are considering the recommendations, but mediation would
not be mandatory.
Elayne E. Greenberg, a mediator and parenting coordinator in Nassau
County who chairs the state bar's committee on alternative dispute
resolution, called the commission's findings a "paradigm shift" and
a sign that long-held skepticism among lawyers and judges has given
way to recognition "that divorce is not only a legal process but an
emotional process."
Continuing Reservations
Some in the legal community still have reservations, though.
"If you have a strong, tough businessman and he goes into mediation
with a passive wife you can rest assured he's going to run that
mediation," said Dominic A. Barbara, who has a Long Island
litigation practice. "The mediators have a vested interest in trying
to settle a case. Very often they're looking for future referrals
and might want to please the more successful and powerful of the two
spouses."
If both spouses are behaving reasonably, he said, there is no reason
why their attorneys should not sit down and settle a divorce.
Mediators counter that attorneys, who advocate by a different set of
rules, may have their clients' financial interests at heart but not
their emotional well-being.
"Attorneys should be used sometimes more intelligently, that is, to
fine tune an agreement rather than litigate the hell out of
something," commented Mr. Jay.
Ms. Polisner gives an example: Divorce attorneys commonly advise
clients not to move out of the marital residence for fear of how it
will look to a judge, even if continuing to live together damages
the couple's relationship.
She and Mr. Jay will not take on a divorce in which physical abuse
is an issue because of the perceived power imbalance, although other
mediators, like Ms. Greenberg, may do so under careful monitoring.
They will also terminate mediation if they believe a spouse is
acting in bad faith.
They see their role as helping to make a difficult situation
bearable and to preserve family relationships, especially with a
couple's children.
Changing circumstances and living situations also play to the
flexible agreements that mediation produces, they say.
High home prices on Long Island make selling off the family house
problematic and parents are generally sharing more time with
children. Some couples continue to share the home where their
children live and rotate between apartments.
Ms. Polisner and Mr. Jay still occasionally choke up during the
saddest divorces, when one spouse is blind-sided and is still coming
to grips with the fact that their marriage is ending.
"We're both still moved by every case that comes in here," said Ms.
Polisner, who is also married with children. "After very mediation
we have to look at each other and remind ourselves it could be us
sitting on the other side of the table."
— Peter C. Beller is a freelance writer.
[Index
to Articles]
|