|

Future
Tax Shock
Editorial
The New York Times
October 29, 2006
One of President Bush’s
be-very-afraid lines this campaign season is that Democrats, if
elected, will raise taxes. What he doesn’t say is that if you are
one of tens of millions of Americans who make between $75,000 and
$500,000 a year, your taxes are already scheduled to rise starting
next year — because of laws that Mr. Bush championed and other
actions he failed to take.
The higher taxes stem from
the alternative minimum tax, a levy that is supposed to snare
multimillionaires who would otherwise get away with using excessive
tax shelters to wipe out their tax bills. But these days, the
alternative tax is snaring many upper-middle-income filers.
Mr. Bush set the trap in
2001 — and in 2003, 2004 and 2006. In each of those years, he
flogged for new tax cuts without requiring corresponding long-term
changes in the existing rules for the alternative tax. It was well
known that failure to update the alternative tax would create
perverse interactions with the new tax cuts, causing filers’ tax
bills to drop because of the cuts, only to shoot back up again from
the alternative levy.
Mr. Bush said he would
vanquish the problem through tax reform. Didn’t happen. Congress
never wrestled with lasting solutions. The truth is, the president
and lawmakers are paralyzed. To fix the alternative tax while
keeping the Bush tax cuts on the books would result in the loss of
some $800 billion in revenue over 10 years, blowing a hole in the
federal budget and exposing how utterly unaffordable the tax cuts of
the last five years really are.
The taxpayers wrongly
afflicted by the alternative tax are not tax dodgers. For the most
part, they are couples with children who have broken into the ranks
of six-figure earners, and who live in high-tax states like New York
and California. They are being penalized, in effect, for claiming
everyday deductions — like write-offs for dependents and property
taxes — which, under the alternative tax rules, are viewed as
excessive shelters.
Meanwhile,
multimillionaires are not being snared at nearly the same rate as
other filers. In part, that’s because much of the income of the
superrich comes from investments. The tax breaks for investments —
the grail of the administration’s tax-cutting crusade — are not
counted as shelters under the alternative tax the way, say, children
are.
For the past few years,
Congress has papered over the mess by passing temporary relief
measures to shield most — though not all — upper-middle-income
taxpayers from having to pay the alternative tax. The latest stopgap
expires at the end of this year, leaving taxpayers exposed at ever
lower income levels. Congress could pass another temporary stay, and
it will probably do so.
But stopgaps do little to
protect the families already being unfairly clobbered by the
alternative tax. And they make the nation’s underlying budget
problems worse. Like the Bush tax cuts themselves, they result in
less tax revenue than is needed, requiring the government to borrow
heavily. The mounting debt of the Bush years — all of which must be
paid back with interest — makes tax increases or budget cuts, or
both, inevitable.
The president wants to push
off the day of reckoning until he leaves the White House, while
whipping up voter fear of future tax increases. But the reality is
that he and his supporters have laid the groundwork for higher taxes
and hamstrung government, no matter who is in office in the months
and years to come.
[Index
to Articles]
|