|
Pols
Move on 9/11 $1b Held 'Captive'
By Susan Edelman
New York Post
August 5, 2007
Following a Post
investigation that revealed how a $1 billion insurance
fund for the World Trade Center cleanup has spent tens of
millions on overhead and lawyers while paying a pittance
to injured 9/11 recovery workers, two powerful U.S.
senators are demanding answers.
Citing
"serious concerns," Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Arlen
Specter (R-Pa.), the chairman and ranking member,
respectively, of the Senate Judiciary Committee, have
threatened to hold hearings on the city-governed WTC
Captive Insurance Co. unless they are satisfied with
answers on how it has managed the $1 billion in federal
9/11 aid.
According to new
records obtained last week, the WTC Captive has spent more
than $88 million on administrative and legal bills since
it began operating in 2004. That total includes more than
$53 million spent on high-powered law firms.
More than 8,600
rescue and recovery workers have filed claims against the
city or its contractors - most with illnesses blamed on
exposure.
The Captive has
paid out a total of $300,000 to six workers - all for
"slip-and-fall construction accidents with alleged
orthopedic injuries," new records show.
"It is our
understanding that, to date, not a single worker has been
compensated for exposure to harmful substances now known
to have been in the air at that time," Leahy and Specter
said in a letter to Christine LaSala, president and CEO of
the Captive.
The letter refers
to "hundreds of thousands of dollars [spent] on salaries
for administrators," such as LaSala's $350,000 annual
salary plus benefits first revealed by The Post.
"We are
interested in learning how and when the 9/11 cleanup
volunteers and workers will receive the $1 billion in
taxpayer money Congress appropriated for their injuries,"
the senators say, adding they may call for a hearing in
September.
Michael Cardozo,
New York City's corporation counsel, said in a statement
that the Captive "is an insurance company, not a
compensation fund."
The company "is
obligated to defend all claims that have a reasonable and
valid defense," Cardozo said.
The city has
refused to settle with ill workers, while insisting in
court that it has immunity from all lawsuits because it
was responding to a terror attack.
"We would
strongly welcome Congress, as we have repeatedly urged, to
allocate funds for compensation without the need for
litigation," Cardozo said.
Lawyers for some
10,000 WTC workers, David Worby and Marc Bern, went to
Washington to urge Leahy and Specter to act.
"It was clear to
everyone we met that something is terribly wrong with the
way the Captive is being run," Worby said.
WTC Lawyer the
'Devil's Advocate'
By Susan Edelman
New York Post
July 22, 2007
One
of the high-priced lawyers who have sucked $47 million out
of the $1 billion world trade center insurance fund is
infamous for defending companies that manufactured Agent
Orange, a pregnancy drug linked to cancer, and defective
breast implants.
James Tyrrell, a
partner in the law firm Patton Boggs, is hailed in legal
circles as the "master of disaster" and the "devil's
advocate."
Another lawyer,
Thomas Jones, serves simultaneously as secretary of the
WTC Captive Insurance Co., which manages the $1 billion
FEMA fund, and as partner in the Chicago-based
McDermott
Will & Emery, the fund's legal counsel.
James Tyrrell, 57
In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan last week, 9/11 responders
blasted the Captive's mounting expenses - $75 million so
far, including $47 million on law firms - and Jones'
alleged "conflict of interest."
They charged the
city-run WTC Captive is a cash cow for its employees,
consultants and lawyers, and has "squandered" money that
should go to 10,000 cops, firefighters and other workers
with illnesses blamed on toxic exposure at Ground Zero. It
has paid just $45,000 to a carpenter who fell off a
ladder.
Patton Boggs,
based in Washington, D.C., commands up to $850-an-hour -
one of the highest billing rates in the country, according
to a National Law Journal survey.
Tyrell, who works
out of the firm's Newark office, would not discuss what he
charges to lead the battle against Ground Zero responders,
saying his firm's contract with the WTC Captive has a
"confidentiality clause."
The city Law
Department also refused to divulge the fees paid to the
hired guns. Neither Tyrrell nor Patton Boggs has done work
for the city before, officials said.
Documents
obtained by The Post show that eight senior partners at
McDermott, Will & Emery, including Thomas, can each bill
the insurance fund $618 an hour. The partners first billed
a "discounted" $550 an hour, but that fee was raised 6
percent in 2005, and 6 percent again last year.
Under the same
agreement, junior partners in the firm can bill $389 to
$484 an hour; associates $223 to $242 an hour, and
paralegals $150 to $200 an hour.
In addition, the
firm gets reimbursed for a wide variety of expenses,
including secretarial work, computer research, travel and
some meals.
Thomas'
dual role as both an executive of the Captive and its
lawyer, "in no way represents a conflict," McDermott, Will
& Emery said in a statement to The Post.
Tyrrell called
his bills a bargain because he represents the city and
about 100 of its WTC contractors. He also said the firm's
lesser-paid lawyers do much of the work.
The firm has
focused on a bid to dismiss all the 9/11 suits on the
grounds the city should have immunity because it was
responding to a terror attack. An appeals court is
considering the issue.
"If that is
upheld, the city would have no liability and no obligation
to pay," Tyrrell told The Post. "The money should then be
returned to the government."
Tyrrell, 57,
began his toxic-tort career defending Monsanto Company,
the Agent Orange manufacturer, against thousands of ailing
Vietnam vets. The case settled for $180 million.
Later, he
represented pharmaceuticals that made a drug, DES, given
to prevent miscarriages, but found to cause cancer.
He successfully
defended booze companies accused of causing alcoholism. He
defended General Electric, a silicone maker, in a class
action by women with health problems from ruptured breast
implants.
Tyrrell says it's
not easy.
"How would you
like to come to court and be on the other side of the
heroes, the firefighters and policemen who went in on
9/11?" he told Super Lawyers magazine, which highlights
top-rated attorneys.
David Worby, a
lawyer for the 9/11 workers, said Tyrrell "does what he
pleases and eats up the taxpayer dollars intended for the
sick heroes. Each one of his bills deprives a hero of a
full recovery."
But Tyrrell took
a swipe at lawyers for the 9/11 responders, saying they
could also get rich.
"They stand to
take one-third or more of whatever is paid to any of their
clients who allege injuries," he said.
Paul Napoli, a
lawyer for the 10,000 responders, said he won't make a
dime unless his clients win.
"Nobody would
take these cases because it was so hard to prove in the
beginning. Nobody believed these people. We front all the
costs. We've been fighting for them tooth and nail."
Injured Ground Zero Workers Slam WTC Captive Insurance
Co. & Mayor Bloomberg Over Misuse of
FEMA Funds
PRNewswire
July 17, 2007
NEW YORK -- Attorneys for several severely injured heroes
of the "Ground Zero" rescue, recovery and removal efforts
announced today that they have filed a multi-million
dollar law suitagainst the WTC Captive Insurance Company,
Inc., Mayor Bloomberg, and others for the continued waste
and misuse of the billion dollar fund allocated by
Congress to pay for the workers' medical monitoring,
medical treatment and compensation.
The law suit,
entitled John R. Walcott, Frank Maisano and Mary E. Bishop
v. WTC Captive Insurance Company Inc., et al., Index No.:
109775/07 was filed today in the Supreme Court of the
State ofNew York, County of New York. All three Plaintiffs
face life-threatening illnesses from their exposure to
toxins during their work on or at "the pile" at the World
Trade Center site or at the Fresh Kills landfill in the
weeks after the September 11, 2001 attacks but, like
thousands of others, have received no compensation or
reimbursement for medical treatment or testing nor even
had their claims considered by the WTC Captive, despite
its federal funding and creation nearly three years ago.
Instead, the Plaintiffs allege that the WTC Captive's
funds have been used solely for the City's benefit by
virtue of the control wielded by Mayor Bloomberg over the
Captive.
The Plaintiffs
allege that Mayor Bloomberg is using his control to
prolong litigation and refuses to consider the merits of
eachand every claim to force the federal government and
plaintiffs into providing for the City and contractors'
complete relief from all liability while shifting the
burden of compensation back to federal agencies. "The
Captive and its management have spent over $74 million
dollars of the heroes' money on so-called 'loss adjustment
fees,' including over $45 million in legal fees, to fight
the ground zero workers' claims, but they have not paid a
single dollar to a Ground Zero worker who has become ill
from exposure to toxic substances at the WTC and related
sites," said attorney Marc Jay Bern.
The plaintiffs,
John Walcott, Frank Maisano, both former New York City
Police Detectives and Mary Bishop, a former health care
worker assigned to the site, are only three of some 40,000
Ground Zero workers who sacrificed their health and their
families' futures when their City and their country needed
them. "The Captive's and the Mayor's continued
indifference to the suffering of the very people this Fund
was created to help is appalling," says Bern. Their firm,
WORBY GRONER & NAPOLI BERN, LLP, also serves as
Plaintiffs' Co- Liaison Counsel in the pending litigation
against the City of New York and its contractors for the
failure to provide and enforce the use of adequate
respirators and other personal protective equipment during
the debris clean-up efforts at the World Trade Center site
(In re: World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation,
21-MC-100 [AKH], United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York).
In the face of
inquiries by New York's then-Insurance Commissioner Howard
Mills, Senators Schumer and Clinton, and by
Representatives Carolyn Maloney and Jerrold Nadler,
Captive President and CEO Christine LaSala has steadfastly
maintained that FEMA allocated the billion dollar fund
solely to provide for the defense of the City of New York
and its Contractors, as if the Captive is nothing more
than a legal defense fund. This is not the case, according
to the very people who fought for the money for the
Captive's creation. In a July 31, 2006, letter from
Senator Charles Schumer to LaSala, Senator Schumer wrote:
"[w]hen I worked with the City and the contractors, my
intent, along with that of my colleagues in Congress, was
to use this federal money to pay appropriate claims, not
to fight claims."
Indeed, the
entire New York Congressional delegation fought for the
federal funding, according other correspondence directed
to FEMA and cited in the pleadings, to "ensure that
sufficient resources will be available to satisfy
legitimate claims by individuals affected by the recovery
operations while safeguarding the fiscal health of the
City and the contractors." Thus far, because of the
Captive's refusal to consider a single claim for illness
caused by toxic exposures at the WTC and related sites,
that fight has proven to be in vain, leaving the
Plaintiffs with no
recourse but to file suit so that the funds can be freed
for their intended purpose.
Among other
things, the suit alleges that the Captive has violated the
Freedom of Information Law and New York's Open Meetings
Law, by refusing to release or provide access to demanded
documents and holding closed-door meetings, all of which
would reveal the misuse of public funds. The suit claims
that the Captive and its management have violated section
2824.1 of the Public Authorities Accountability Act of
2005, because the Captive and its officers, directors and
managers were obligated - and failed -- to ensure that
board members acted effectively, ethically and
independently.
Instead, because
Mayor Bloomberg annually appoints the entire WTC Captive
board, most of whom are City employees, the Captive merely
does the Mayor's bidding, even when the result is that
there has been no provision of funds for needed medical
testing, treatment or compensation to the heroes of 9/11.
The suit also alleges that the Captive has violated its
fiduciary duties to protect and distribute the funds for
the benefit of the injured Ground Zero workers; that the
defendants have converted the funds intended for the
Ground Zero workers to their own benefit; and seeks a
return of the funds that were improperly paid out.
In addition to
suing the Captive, LaSala and the Captive's Board of
Directors, the litigation seeks return of the millions of
dollars paid to GAB Robbins, the Captive's Third-Party
Claims Administrator and Marsh Management Services, Inc.,
the Captive's Administrator, all of whom have been paid
millions of dollar to administer claims without any
appreciable claim activity.
Sick 9/11 Workers
Sue WTC Insurance Fund
Ground Zero Workers
Demand That $1B Trade Center Insurance Fund Pay For Their
Health Care
CBS News
July 17, 2007
(AP)
Ailing
ground zero workers went to court Tuesday to demand that
the company overseeing a $1 billion Sept. 11 insurance
fund spend the money to pay for their health care.
The workers have already filed a class-action lawsuit
claiming the toxic dust from the World Trade Center site
gave them serious, sometimes fatal diseases. On Tuesday,
they sought compensation from the WTC Captive Insurance
Co., the company in charge of money appropriated by
Congress to deal with Sept. 11 health-related claims.
"The WTC Captive has consistently refused to pay any of
the ground zero workers who have become ill on the work
site, including any compensation" for lost salaries, pain
and suffering, medical treatment, medical monitoring or
burial expenses, said the lawsuit, filed in Manhattan's
state Supreme Court.
It was filed by attorneys representing thousands who
became ill after working to clean up the site while
breathing toxic trade center dust, including more than 100
who have died.
"She hasn't paid a penny to one of my 10,000 people,"
David Worby, an attorney representing the workers, said of
the company's CEO, Christine LaSala. "It was their
mandate."
Mayor Michael
Bloomberg, who was named in the suit along with LaSala and
board members, said Tuesday that attorneys are wrong about
the company's structure.
"They just don't know the facts. The truth of the matter
is, Congress didn't set up a victims' compensation fund,"
the mayor said. "We'd like them to do that, we've asked
for that, they set up a captive insurance company. And the
insurance company can only pay out monies if somebody sues
us in court and wins a judgment against us."
Congress directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency
to set up the fund, appropriating up to $1 billion "to
establish a captive insurance company or other appropriate
insurance mechanism for claims arising from debris
removal, which may include claims made by city employees,"
according to the 2003 resolution.
The lawsuit, relying on testimony from federal officials
over the years about the fund's purpose, said officials
meant for the money to be used to compensate ailing
workers. Federal and state governments never said "that a
captive insurance company be established solely to defend
the city of New York and its contractors from all rescue,
recovery and debris removal related claims, at all costs,"
the lawsuit said.
In this case, the term "captive" refers to an entity
created specifically to cover 9/11-related claims for the
New York City government.
Since it began operating in 2004, the company has spent
more than $73 million of the insurance money in legal fees
and other expenses, the lawsuit says.
Worby and other attorneys plan to go to Washington later
this week to lobby congressional leaders to urge the
company to make the $1 billion available immediately for
sick workers.
The largest study conducted of about 20,000 ground zero
workers reported last year that 70 percent of patients
suffer respiratory disease years after the cleanup. The
city earlier this year added to its Sept. 11 death toll a
woman who died in 2002 of lung disease, five months after
being caught in the dust cloud of the collapsing twin
towers.
Bloomberg and other city officials have estimated the cost
of caring for the workers who are sick or who could become
sick at $393 million a year and urged the federal
government to pay for their treatment and monitoring.
World Trade Center Rescue
Workers Sue WTC Captive Insurance Company for Long-overdue
Compensation
NEWSINFERNO.COM
July 17th, 2007
World Trade Center first responders have yet to receive
any money from a fund established to compensate them for
injuries they received while aiding in rescue efforts,
and now a group of the rescue workers are suing the
plan’s administrator to get what they are due. WTC
Captive Insurance Company has said in the past that the
$1 billion set aside for sick
emergency
workers must first be used to litigate lawsuits
before any of it goes to compensate workers. As a
result, not one 9/11 fist responder has received any
compensation from the fund nearly six years after the
terrorist attacks.
In 2003, Congress
ordered the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to set aside $1
billion to compensate rescue workers for injuries and
illnesses they sustained during 9/11 recovery efforts.
Because so many of the workers were volunteers, they
were not covered under traditional workers compensation
policies. FEMA established WTC Captive Insurance Company
to disburse the funds. The insurance fund has spent more
than $75 million dollars to litigate worker lawsuits,
and refuses to pay compensation to workers until all
claims are settled. Attorneys for the
World Trade Center workers say that Congress never
intended for the fund to be used for this purpose.
Since the
attacks, World Trade Center first responders have faced
chronic health problems. Many have been unable to work,
and were counting on compensation from the WTC Captive
Insurance fund to help them financially. A study by the
Mt. Sinai Medical Center found that of 9,000 emergency
workers, 70-percent had suffered some type of lung
ailment after the attacks, and that 60-percent still
faced respiratory problems. Another report released by
the FDNY in early May reported that cases of the rare
lung disease sarcoidosis had risen dramatically among
firefighters and EMS workers who had spent time at
Ground Zero. And the worst may not be over. Many of the
chemicals that rescue workers were exposed to, like
asbestos and dioxin, are dangerous carcinogens. Public
health authorities are already bracing for what might be
the next wave of health problems related to the 9/11
tragedy - a surge in cancer and cancer-related deaths
among rescue workers. Advocates for the workers estimate
that the cost of caring for them could eventually reach
$393 million each year, and have asked the federal
government to set aside more funds for their treatment
and monitoring.
Just last
month, former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head
Christine Todd Whitman appeared before congress to
answer for her agency’s handling of the 9/11 aftermath.
Shortly after the tragedy, the EPA issued a series of
statements assuring the public and the World Trade
Center workers that the air around Ground Zero was safe
to breathe. As a result, many rescue workers spent weeks
sifting through the debris with little protective gear.
At the hearing, Whitman defended these statements,
saying that she was trying “to get the city back on its
feet as quickly as possible”.
Schumer Blasts Taxpayer-Financed Insurance Company For
Stonewalling Ground Zero Recovery Workers
Senator, Who Secured
$1 Billion in Federal Funding, Calls on Captive Insurance
Fund to Stop Fighting Every Claim Tooth and Nail Schumer:
Five Years after 9-11, This Isn’t What Fund Was Intended
For – Need To Set Criteria and Start Making Payments to
Workers Injured at Ground Zero
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE: July 31, 2006
Today, U.S.
Senator Charles E. Schumer blasted the WTC Captive
Insurance Company for failing to pay the claims of those
who are injured or ill as a result of their work at Ground
Zero and called on its C EO, Christine LaSala, to
immediately establish new protocols and objective criteria
so that this money can be distributed as quickly as
possible. Schumer, who fought to secure the $1 billion
federal funding in the months after 9/11, said the Company
appeared to be more concerned with technical legal
arguments, than paying those who are injured, including
the fire fighters, police officers , EMT’s, building
trades workers and other workers who cleared debris at the
World Trade Center site.
“After 9/11,
these heroes led the charge to bring New York City and
America back and now they are being left behind,” Schumer
said. “These workers were injured serving our nation in
its time of greatest need, and we must not turn our backs
on them now. No one involved with the establishment of
this fund expected it to behave like a stingy, bottom-line
obsessed corporation. Rather, it was created out of
recognition that neither the City nor the contractors were
responsible for the attacks and that those who were
injured while working at Ground Zero deserved full and
swift compensation.”
Because no
private insurer would take on the risks associated with
the site and address the unforeseen health risks
associated with working at Ground Zero, Schumer fought to
ensure the federal government would fill the gap. Schumer,
working with the City, contractors and the Administration,
secured $1 billion in federal funds to ensure that those
injured at the site or who became sick from working on the
top of the pile of toxic debris would be compensated.
To ensure
coverage for the nearly 40,000 workers who toiled at the
Ground Zero site, Schumer said the federal funds were to
act as a premium payment to a captive insurance company
controlled by the City and established under New York law.
Schumer personally lobbied then Office of Management and
Budget Administrator Mitch Daniels to include the $1
billion as part of New York City’s $20 billion recovery
package.
Unfortunately, it
has been widely reported that the WTC Captive Insurance
Company has instead spent significant portions of its
limited resources litigating a technical legal question
rather than moving forward with paying claims of those who
were injured at the site. The company has spent more than
$31.6 million since 2004 on overhead and expenses -
including $22 million on legal fees.
In his
letter, Schumer wrote, “My intent, along with that of
my colleagues in Congress, was to use this federal money
to pay appropriate claims, not to fight claims… I urge the
captive insurance company to immediately stop litigating
this technical, legal question and begin the process of
reviewing and paying appropriate claims of those who are
sick or injured.” Schumer added that, “The cases of those
that have already died – Firefighter Stephen Johnson,
Police Officer James Godbee, Detective James Zadroga and
Emergency Medical Service paramedic Debbie Reeve – should
receive particular attention.”
After the
September 11 attacks, thousands of first responders and
construction workers rushed to the site to assist with
search and rescue operations, and recovery and debris
removal. As a result, many have potentially suffered
debilitating, even life-threatening, injuries, resulting
for inhaling toxic fumes and residue while working at the
Ground Zero site.
www.comptroller.nyc.gov/bureaus/bud/04reports/9-11-3years-later-securing-federal-pledge.pdf
NY to Widen Scope for Captives
Insurance Journal
March 24, 2003
New York Governor George
E. Pataki and New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
jointly announced new legislation that will allow a wider
range of businesses "the opportunity to utilize captive
insurance companies to retain, fund, and better manage
some of their risk."
The proposed bill will
also allow for the formation of a pure captive insurance
company by New York City to provide coverages for
liability "relating to or arising out of activities in or
near the World Trade Center site in response to the
attacks of September 11, 2001," said the announcement.
"The new legislation will
mean New York City will now have important insurance
coverages it greatly needs relating to the tragedies of
September 11th," Pataki stated. "The Federal Emergency
Management Agency specifically authorized the creation of
a New York City captive and the City explored various
options and decided that the formation of a captive
insurance company was in its best interest for claims
arising out of the clean-up effort at and near the World
Trade Center." He indicated that the bill was also aimed
at "creating business opportunities and jobs in the State
of New York."
Mayor Bloomberg commented:
"The City of New York, together with State officials and
the New York Congressional delegation, has fought long and
hard for federally-paid insurance to protect the City and
its contractors for claims arising from the massive debris
removal work done in the World Trade Center. This
legislation is necessary for the City to expedite the
payment of claims relating to this effort."
The announcement noted
that "the new State captive legislation contains several
provisions to help the State's business community. The
bill provides a new risk transfer vehicle, known as a
sponsored captive insurance company, which permits various
participants to use the same vehicle to self-fund their
risks. The bill in addition, creates additional
flexibility by lowering the threshold for businesses to
form single parent captives and to participate in a group
captive. As well, public entities that meet appropriate
standards will also be permitted to form captives."
"The U.S. Congress
recently passed legislation directing the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide the City of
New York with up to $1 billion in coverage for the City
and its contractors for claims arising from debris removal
performed after the collapse of the World Trade Center
buildings. The federal legislation also directs the City
of New York to use such funds to establish a captive
insurance company or other such appropriate insurance
mechanism," it continued.
NY Superintendent of
Insurance Gregory V. Serio stated: "The new State captive
legislation also creates greater flexibility and allows
businesses and public entities new opportunities to avail
themselves of greater choices for more efficiency in
managing and financing risk. Given the contraction of the
commercial insurance market around the country, the new
legislation affords even more of New York's businesses a
valuable option by offering the use of captives as an
alternative form of insurance. The New York State
Insurance Department is proud of its status as both a
facilitator of insurance coverage for New York's
businesses and industry regulator of safety and soundness
in the best traditions of financial regulation. The
Department stands ready to help New York's businesses
manage their risk, save money and gain greater control of
their corporate futures."
The Insurance Department
recently announced a newly dedicated "captive group" and
the launch of a new Web site designed to fast-track
applications for captive formation. "In order to be even
more responsive to the needs of a rapidly changing
insurance marketplace, New York's businesses now have
dedicated contacts in the Department of Insurance to
answer all captive insurance questions and process captive
applications within 30 days of the receipt of a fully
completed application." The web address is
www.NYCaptives.com.
Empire State Development
Corporation Chairman Charles A. Gargano praised the
initiative as providing opportunities for "Companies from
across the State, across the Nation, and around the world"
to expand their operations and invest in New York. Pataki
signed New York's first captive legislation in August
1997, authorizing the formation of captive insurance
companies in the State.
Serio added, "The
Department's streamlined licensing process will allow New
York's business community to benefit from captive
formation. Once formed, a captive can reduce a business'
insurance costs by reducing premiums, accessing the
reinsurance market, and centralizing the enterprise's risk
management operation. I encourage the State's business
community to explore the possibilities and the advantages
associated with the creation of captives."
Find this article
at:
|